Filgrastim作为主要预防药物治疗恶性肿瘤患者的疗效。

Terra Furney, Amy Horowitz, John Malamakal, Christopher R Frei
{"title":"Filgrastim作为主要预防药物治疗恶性肿瘤患者的疗效。","authors":"Terra Furney,&nbsp;Amy Horowitz,&nbsp;John Malamakal,&nbsp;Christopher R Frei","doi":"10.12788/fp.0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the risk and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and is recommended for at-risk patients receiving chemotherapy. Within the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, daily filgrastim injections remain the preferred formulation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 59 patients who received daily filgrastim as primary prophylaxis with a curative cancer diagnosis and a chemotherapy regimen at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System from September 1, 2015 to September 24, 2020. Patients had either a high risk for febrile neutropenia or a chemotherapy regimen with an intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia and additional risk factors. The primary outcome was the incidence of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia leading to treatment delays. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose decreases or discontinuations, hospitalizations, days of hospitalization, infections, extended duration of filgrastim, and transitions to pegfilgrastim due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients received a median (IQR) of 7 (5-10) doses of filgrastim for primary prophylaxis. Overall, 10 patients (17%) experienced treatment delays due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia. Fifteen patients (25%) were hospitalized with a median (IQR) length of stay of 5 (4-7) days, 9 patients (15%) had documented infections, and 2 patients (3%) required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Additionally, 9 patients (15%) required an additional median (IQR) of 2 (2-5) doses of filgrastim, and 9 (15%) patients were transitioned to pegfilgrastim.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that additional measures such as tracking postnadir absolute neutrophil counts should be performed to ensure patients receive an appropriate number of filgrastim doses to prevent complications associated with neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"40 Suppl 1","pages":"S54-S59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506498/pdf/fp-40-05s-054.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Terra Furney,&nbsp;Amy Horowitz,&nbsp;John Malamakal,&nbsp;Christopher R Frei\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the risk and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and is recommended for at-risk patients receiving chemotherapy. Within the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, daily filgrastim injections remain the preferred formulation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 59 patients who received daily filgrastim as primary prophylaxis with a curative cancer diagnosis and a chemotherapy regimen at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System from September 1, 2015 to September 24, 2020. Patients had either a high risk for febrile neutropenia or a chemotherapy regimen with an intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia and additional risk factors. The primary outcome was the incidence of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia leading to treatment delays. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose decreases or discontinuations, hospitalizations, days of hospitalization, infections, extended duration of filgrastim, and transitions to pegfilgrastim due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients received a median (IQR) of 7 (5-10) doses of filgrastim for primary prophylaxis. Overall, 10 patients (17%) experienced treatment delays due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia. Fifteen patients (25%) were hospitalized with a median (IQR) length of stay of 5 (4-7) days, 9 patients (15%) had documented infections, and 2 patients (3%) required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Additionally, 9 patients (15%) required an additional median (IQR) of 2 (2-5) doses of filgrastim, and 9 (15%) patients were transitioned to pegfilgrastim.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that additional measures such as tracking postnadir absolute neutrophil counts should be performed to ensure patients receive an appropriate number of filgrastim doses to prevent complications associated with neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"40 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S54-S59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506498/pdf/fp-40-05s-054.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:粒细胞集落刺激因子预防已被证明可以降低化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少症和发热性中性粒细胞增多症的风险和持续时间,并推荐用于接受化疗的高危患者。在南德克萨斯州退伍军人医疗保健系统内,每日注射非格拉司汀仍然是粒细胞集落刺激因子的首选配方,用于初级预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症。方法:这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了59名患者,他们于2015年9月1日至2020年9月24日在南德克萨斯州退伍军人医疗保健系统接受每日非格拉司汀作为主要预防措施,诊断为癌症并接受化疗方案。患者要么有发热性中性粒细胞减少症的高风险,要么有化疗方案,其中发热性中性白细胞减少症和其他风险因素的风险中等。主要结果是中性粒细胞减少症/发热性中性粒细胞降低症的发生率导致治疗延误。次要结果包括化疗剂量减少或停药、住院、住院天数、感染、非格拉司汀持续时间延长,以及因中性粒细胞减少症/发热性中性粒细胞增多症而转为聚乙二醇非格拉司坦。结果:患者接受了7(5-10)剂量的非格拉司汀的中位(IQR)进行初级预防。总体而言,有10名患者(17%)因中性粒细胞减少症/发热性中性粒细胞增多症而出现治疗延误。15名患者(25%)住院,中位(IQR)住院时间为5(4-7)天,9名患者(15%)有感染记录,2名患者(3%)需要减少化疗剂量。此外,9名患者(15%)需要2(2-5)剂量的额外中位(IQR)非格拉司汀,9名(15%)患者过渡到培非格拉司丁。结论:这些结果表明,应采取额外措施,如追踪最低点后的中性粒细胞绝对计数,以确保患者接受适当数量的非格拉司汀剂量,以防止与中性粒细胞减少症/发热性中性粒细胞减少症相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis.

Background: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the risk and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and is recommended for at-risk patients receiving chemotherapy. Within the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, daily filgrastim injections remain the preferred formulation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 59 patients who received daily filgrastim as primary prophylaxis with a curative cancer diagnosis and a chemotherapy regimen at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System from September 1, 2015 to September 24, 2020. Patients had either a high risk for febrile neutropenia or a chemotherapy regimen with an intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia and additional risk factors. The primary outcome was the incidence of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia leading to treatment delays. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose decreases or discontinuations, hospitalizations, days of hospitalization, infections, extended duration of filgrastim, and transitions to pegfilgrastim due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.

Results: Patients received a median (IQR) of 7 (5-10) doses of filgrastim for primary prophylaxis. Overall, 10 patients (17%) experienced treatment delays due to neutropenia/febrile neutropenia. Fifteen patients (25%) were hospitalized with a median (IQR) length of stay of 5 (4-7) days, 9 patients (15%) had documented infections, and 2 patients (3%) required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Additionally, 9 patients (15%) required an additional median (IQR) of 2 (2-5) doses of filgrastim, and 9 (15%) patients were transitioned to pegfilgrastim.

Conclusions: These results suggest that additional measures such as tracking postnadir absolute neutrophil counts should be performed to ensure patients receive an appropriate number of filgrastim doses to prevent complications associated with neutropenia/febrile neutropenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olfactory Hallucinations Following COVID-19 Vaccination. Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes by p16INK4a Antigen Status in a Veteran Population. Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis. Contralateral Constrictor Dose Predicts Swallowing Function After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer. Acute Painful Horner Syndrome as the First Presenting Sign of Carotid Artery Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1