PETRA-MRA在脑动脉瘤支架辅助线圈栓塞术后随访中的作用。

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19 DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0021
Yusuke Ebiko, Hikaru Wakabayashi, Tomoaki Okada, Tatsuya Mizoue, Shinichi Wakabayashi
{"title":"PETRA-MRA在脑动脉瘤支架辅助线圈栓塞术后随访中的作用。","authors":"Yusuke Ebiko,&nbsp;Hikaru Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Tomoaki Okada,&nbsp;Tatsuya Mizoue,&nbsp;Shinichi Wakabayashi","doi":"10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Image evaluation after stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) for a cerebral aneurysm is difficult with conventional MRA or CTA because of metal artifacts. Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA)-MRA is a noninvasive imaging examination that can reduce metal artifacts. This study aimed to examine whether PETRA-MRA can be used as a follow-up imaging after SAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients (eight women and four men; mean age, 66.9 ± 13.2 years) underwent SAC for unruptured aneurysms and were retrospectively evaluated using time-of-flight (TOF)- and PETRA-MRA data from the same follow-up session. Two neurosurgeons independently compared the aneurysm occlusion status and flow visualization score in the stented parent artery (4-point scale, where 4 points represented excellent visualization) between TOF- and PETRA-MRA images. If DSA was performed within 3 months before or after PETRA-MRA, the aneurysm assessment was compared between MRA and DSA. The interobserver agreement for each MRA was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of the 12 patients underwent DSA within 3 months before and after TOF- and PETRA-MRA. The aneurysm occlusion status on DSA was more consistent with PETRA-MRA (eight of nine cases) than with TOF-MRA (one of nine cases; <i>P</i> = 0.023). The median visualization score of the stented parent artery was significantly higher for PETRA-MRA (4 [interquartile range {IQR} 3-4]) than for TOF-MRA (1 [IQR 1-1], <i>P</i> = 0.003). The interobserver agreement for evaluation of the aneurysm occlusion status and visualization score of the parent artery for PETRA-MRA were excellent (κ = 0.98 and 0.93, respectively). In one case, PETRA-MRA was able to detect aneurysm recurrence, leading to subsequent retreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PETRA-MRA is a noninvasive examination that can be used to evaluate the occlusion status of aneurysms after SAC and visualize the stented parent artery. PETRA-MRA is useful for repeated follow-up examinations after SAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"17 9","pages":"188-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/3a/jnet-17-188.PMC10508989.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of PETRA-MRA for Postoperative Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Ebiko,&nbsp;Hikaru Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Tomoaki Okada,&nbsp;Tatsuya Mizoue,&nbsp;Shinichi Wakabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Image evaluation after stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) for a cerebral aneurysm is difficult with conventional MRA or CTA because of metal artifacts. Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA)-MRA is a noninvasive imaging examination that can reduce metal artifacts. This study aimed to examine whether PETRA-MRA can be used as a follow-up imaging after SAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients (eight women and four men; mean age, 66.9 ± 13.2 years) underwent SAC for unruptured aneurysms and were retrospectively evaluated using time-of-flight (TOF)- and PETRA-MRA data from the same follow-up session. Two neurosurgeons independently compared the aneurysm occlusion status and flow visualization score in the stented parent artery (4-point scale, where 4 points represented excellent visualization) between TOF- and PETRA-MRA images. If DSA was performed within 3 months before or after PETRA-MRA, the aneurysm assessment was compared between MRA and DSA. The interobserver agreement for each MRA was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of the 12 patients underwent DSA within 3 months before and after TOF- and PETRA-MRA. The aneurysm occlusion status on DSA was more consistent with PETRA-MRA (eight of nine cases) than with TOF-MRA (one of nine cases; <i>P</i> = 0.023). The median visualization score of the stented parent artery was significantly higher for PETRA-MRA (4 [interquartile range {IQR} 3-4]) than for TOF-MRA (1 [IQR 1-1], <i>P</i> = 0.003). The interobserver agreement for evaluation of the aneurysm occlusion status and visualization score of the parent artery for PETRA-MRA were excellent (κ = 0.98 and 0.93, respectively). In one case, PETRA-MRA was able to detect aneurysm recurrence, leading to subsequent retreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PETRA-MRA is a noninvasive examination that can be used to evaluate the occlusion status of aneurysms after SAC and visualize the stented parent artery. PETRA-MRA is useful for repeated follow-up examinations after SAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"188-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/3a/jnet-17-188.PMC10508989.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于金属伪影,传统的MRA或CTA难以对脑动脉瘤支架辅助线圈栓塞(SAC)后的图像进行评估。径向采集点编码时间缩短(PETRA)-MRA是一种无创成像检查,可以减少金属伪影。本研究旨在检查PETRA-MRA是否可以作为SAC后的随访成像。方法:12名患者(8名女性和4名男性;平均年龄66.9±13.2岁)因未破裂动脉瘤接受SAC治疗,并使用同一随访期的飞行时间(TOF)和PETRA-MRA数据进行回顾性评估。两名神经外科医生在TOF和PETRA-MRA图像之间独立比较了支架母动脉的动脉瘤闭塞状态和血流可视化评分(4分制,其中4分表示良好的可视化)。如果在PETRA-MRA之前或之后的3个月内进行DSA,则比较MRA和DSA之间的动脉瘤评估。评估每个MRA的观察者间一致性。结果:12例患者中有9例在TOF-和PETRA-MRA前后3个月内接受了DSA检查。DSA上的动脉瘤闭塞状态与PETRA-MRA(9例中的8例)相比,与TOF-MRA(9例之一;P=0.023)更为一致。PETRA-MRA(4[四分位间距{IQR}3-4])支架母动脉的中位可视化得分显著高于TOF-MRI(1[IQR 1-1/],P=0.003)。观察者对动脉瘤闭塞状况评估的一致性并且PETRA-MRA的母动脉可视化评分非常好(κ分别为0.98和0.93)。在一个病例中,PETRA-MRA能够检测到动脉瘤复发,导致随后的再治疗。结论:PETRA-MRA是一种无创性检查,可用于评估SAC后动脉瘤的闭塞状态,并可显示支架母动脉。PETRA-MRA可用于SAC后的重复随访检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usefulness of PETRA-MRA for Postoperative Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Objective: Image evaluation after stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) for a cerebral aneurysm is difficult with conventional MRA or CTA because of metal artifacts. Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA)-MRA is a noninvasive imaging examination that can reduce metal artifacts. This study aimed to examine whether PETRA-MRA can be used as a follow-up imaging after SAC.

Methods: Twelve patients (eight women and four men; mean age, 66.9 ± 13.2 years) underwent SAC for unruptured aneurysms and were retrospectively evaluated using time-of-flight (TOF)- and PETRA-MRA data from the same follow-up session. Two neurosurgeons independently compared the aneurysm occlusion status and flow visualization score in the stented parent artery (4-point scale, where 4 points represented excellent visualization) between TOF- and PETRA-MRA images. If DSA was performed within 3 months before or after PETRA-MRA, the aneurysm assessment was compared between MRA and DSA. The interobserver agreement for each MRA was evaluated.

Results: Nine of the 12 patients underwent DSA within 3 months before and after TOF- and PETRA-MRA. The aneurysm occlusion status on DSA was more consistent with PETRA-MRA (eight of nine cases) than with TOF-MRA (one of nine cases; P = 0.023). The median visualization score of the stented parent artery was significantly higher for PETRA-MRA (4 [interquartile range {IQR} 3-4]) than for TOF-MRA (1 [IQR 1-1], P = 0.003). The interobserver agreement for evaluation of the aneurysm occlusion status and visualization score of the parent artery for PETRA-MRA were excellent (κ = 0.98 and 0.93, respectively). In one case, PETRA-MRA was able to detect aneurysm recurrence, leading to subsequent retreatment.

Conclusion: PETRA-MRA is a noninvasive examination that can be used to evaluate the occlusion status of aneurysms after SAC and visualize the stented parent artery. PETRA-MRA is useful for repeated follow-up examinations after SAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Tandem Lesion Treated with Endovascular Thrombectomy by Internal Carotid Artery Direct Puncture. A Case of Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistula with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava. A Case of Flow Diverter Placement for a Recurrent Large Thrombosed Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm. An Updated Review on the Pathogenesis of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Its Therapeutic Targets. Early Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1