[Clinical application of combination of different types of free perforator flaps in the repair of complex wounds in extremities].

Objective: To investigate the clinical application effects of combination of different types of free perforator flaps in the repair of complex wounds in extremities. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. From January 2018 to June 2022, 11 patients with complex wounds in extremities who met the inclusion criteria was admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, including 8 males and 3 females, aged 28 to 55 years. The wounds in the upper extremities in 4 cases and in the lower extremities in 7 cases were repaired with different combination of free perforator flaps. After debridement, the wound area was 7.0 cm×6.0 cm-28.0 cm×12.0 cm. A combination of different types of perforator flaps were applied, including the perforator tri-leaf flap of the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery in 6 cases, the descending branch of lateral femoral circumflex artery combined with oblique branch perforating branch flap in 2 cases, the lobulated flap of the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery combined with the contralateral medial plantar artery perforator flap in 2 cases, and the bilateral perforator flap of the descending branch of lateral femoral circumflex artery combined with great toe nail flap in 1 case, with the size of a single flap ranged from 2.0 cm×2.0 cm-25.0 cm×6.0 cm. The donor site was repaired by direct suture, skin grafting, or flap transplantation. During free flap transplantation, the flap was cut and split according to the distribution of perforators, and end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis was performed between the donor area and the recipient area. After surgery, the survival of transplanted flap in the primary recipient site, the occurrence of vascular crisis, the wound healing in the flap donor site, and the survival of transplanted skin or flap in the flap donor site were observed. During follow-up, the blood supply, appearance and texture of the transplanted flap in the primary recipient site were observed; and at the same time, the weight bearing of the plantar receiving area, the presence of sliding, ulcers, and sinus tracts of the flap, and the appearance and function of the hand were observed; the complications in the donor area were observed. Results: After surgery, one patient's transplanted flap in the primary recipient site had vascular crisis but survived after exploration+vein graft bridging; partial necrosis occurred in one lobe of anterolateral thigh lobulated flap transplanted to the primary recipient site in one patient and recovered after dressing change+skin grafting, and the different types of perforator flap transplanted to the primary recipient site in the other 9 patients all survived. After surgery, the wound with direct suture at the donor site healed well, and the skin or flap transplanted to the donor area survived well. During 3-24 months of follow-up, the blood supply, appearance, and texture of the transplanted flap at the primary recipient site were good. In two patients, the anterolateral thigh flap combined with the medial plantar flap were used to repair plantar defects. The plantar receiving area was able to bear weight, and the texture of the flaps in the recipient area was close to the normal plantar skin, without flap sliding, ulcer, or sinus tract formation. In one patient, bilateral anterolateral thigh flap combined with great toe nail flap were used to repair hand combined with soft forearm defect, and the appearance and function of hand, especially thumb were good. Only linear scar was left in the donor site without other obvious complications. Conclusions: The combination of different types of perforator flaps is a reliable clinical method to repair complex wounds in extremities with high safety, good efficacy, and less complications.