颞脑膨出的脑电图源定位:与手术切除和临床结果的一致性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001021
Benjamin C Cox, Shruti H Agashe, Kelsey M Smith, Kiran M Kanth, Jamie J Van Gompel, Karl N Krecke, Robert J Witte, Lily C Wong-Kisiel, Benjamin H Brinkmann
{"title":"颞脑膨出的脑电图源定位:与手术切除和临床结果的一致性。","authors":"Benjamin C Cox, Shruti H Agashe, Kelsey M Smith, Kiran M Kanth, Jamie J Van Gompel, Karl N Krecke, Robert J Witte, Lily C Wong-Kisiel, Benjamin H Brinkmann","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temporal encephaloceles are a cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy; however, their relationship with epileptogenesis is unclear, and optimal surgical resection is uncertain. EEG source localization (ESL) may guide surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy and temporal encephaloceles, who underwent limited resection and had 1-year outcomes. EEG source localization was performed using standard density scalp EEG of ictal and interictal activity. Distance from dipole and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) solutions to the encephalocele were measured. Concordance of ESL with encephalocele and surgical resection was compared with 1-year surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients met criteria. The mean distances from ESL results to encephalocele center for dipole and sLORETA analyses were 23 mm (SD 9) and 22 mm (SD 11), respectively. Ten patients (55.6%) had Engel I outcomes at 1 year. Dipole-encephalocele distance and sLORETA-encephalocele distance were significantly longer in patients with Engel I outcome and patients whose encephalocele was contained by sLORETA had worse outcome as well; however, multiple logistic regression analysis found that only containment of encephalocele by the sLORETA current density was significant ( P < 0.05), odds ratio 0.12 (95% confidence interval [0.021, 0.71]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EEG source localization of scalp EEG localizes near encephaloceles, however, typically not in the encephalocele itself; this may be due to scalp EEG sampling propagated activity or alternatively that the seizure onset zone extends beyond the herniated cortex. Surprisingly, we observed increased ESL to encephalocele distances in patients with excellent surgical outcomes. Larger cohort studies including intracranial EEG data are needed to further explore this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"515-521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EEG Source Localization in Temporal Encephaloceles: Concordance With Surgical Resection and Clinical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin C Cox, Shruti H Agashe, Kelsey M Smith, Kiran M Kanth, Jamie J Van Gompel, Karl N Krecke, Robert J Witte, Lily C Wong-Kisiel, Benjamin H Brinkmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temporal encephaloceles are a cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy; however, their relationship with epileptogenesis is unclear, and optimal surgical resection is uncertain. EEG source localization (ESL) may guide surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy and temporal encephaloceles, who underwent limited resection and had 1-year outcomes. EEG source localization was performed using standard density scalp EEG of ictal and interictal activity. Distance from dipole and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) solutions to the encephalocele were measured. Concordance of ESL with encephalocele and surgical resection was compared with 1-year surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients met criteria. The mean distances from ESL results to encephalocele center for dipole and sLORETA analyses were 23 mm (SD 9) and 22 mm (SD 11), respectively. Ten patients (55.6%) had Engel I outcomes at 1 year. Dipole-encephalocele distance and sLORETA-encephalocele distance were significantly longer in patients with Engel I outcome and patients whose encephalocele was contained by sLORETA had worse outcome as well; however, multiple logistic regression analysis found that only containment of encephalocele by the sLORETA current density was significant ( P < 0.05), odds ratio 0.12 (95% confidence interval [0.021, 0.71]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EEG source localization of scalp EEG localizes near encephaloceles, however, typically not in the encephalocele itself; this may be due to scalp EEG sampling propagated activity or alternatively that the seizure onset zone extends beyond the herniated cortex. Surprisingly, we observed increased ESL to encephalocele distances in patients with excellent surgical outcomes. Larger cohort studies including intracranial EEG data are needed to further explore this finding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"515-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颞叶脑膨出是颞叶耐药癫痫的病因之一;然而,它们与癫痫发生的关系尚不清楚,最佳手术切除也不确定。EEG源定位(ESL)可以指导手术决策。方法:我们回顾了罗切斯特梅奥诊所的耐药颞叶癫痫和颞叶脑膨出患者,他们接受了有限的切除术,并有1年的疗效。使用发作期和发作间期活动的标准密度头皮脑电图进行EEG源定位。测量了偶极子和标准化低分辨率脑电磁断层扫描(sLORETA)溶液到脑膨出的距离。将ESL与脑膨出和手术切除的一致性与1年的手术结果进行比较。结果:17名患者符合标准。偶极和sLORETA分析的ESL结果到脑膨出中心的平均距离分别为23毫米(SD 9)和22毫米(SD 11)。10名患者(55.6%)在1年时出现Engel I结果。Engel I结果患者的偶极脑膨出距离和sLORETA脑膨出距明显较长,sLORETA控制脑膨出的患者的结果也较差;然而,多元逻辑回归分析发现,sLORETA电流密度仅能抑制脑膨出是显著的(P<0.05),比值比为0.12(95%置信区间[0.0210.71]);这可能是由于头皮EEG采样传播的活动,或者癫痫发作区延伸到突出的皮层之外。令人惊讶的是,我们观察到在手术效果良好的患者中,ESL与脑膨出的距离增加。需要包括颅内脑电图数据在内的更大规模的队列研究来进一步探索这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EEG Source Localization in Temporal Encephaloceles: Concordance With Surgical Resection and Clinical Outcomes.

Purpose: Temporal encephaloceles are a cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy; however, their relationship with epileptogenesis is unclear, and optimal surgical resection is uncertain. EEG source localization (ESL) may guide surgical decision-making.

Methods: We reviewed patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy and temporal encephaloceles, who underwent limited resection and had 1-year outcomes. EEG source localization was performed using standard density scalp EEG of ictal and interictal activity. Distance from dipole and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) solutions to the encephalocele were measured. Concordance of ESL with encephalocele and surgical resection was compared with 1-year surgical outcomes.

Results: Seventeen patients met criteria. The mean distances from ESL results to encephalocele center for dipole and sLORETA analyses were 23 mm (SD 9) and 22 mm (SD 11), respectively. Ten patients (55.6%) had Engel I outcomes at 1 year. Dipole-encephalocele distance and sLORETA-encephalocele distance were significantly longer in patients with Engel I outcome and patients whose encephalocele was contained by sLORETA had worse outcome as well; however, multiple logistic regression analysis found that only containment of encephalocele by the sLORETA current density was significant ( P < 0.05), odds ratio 0.12 (95% confidence interval [0.021, 0.71]).

Conclusions: EEG source localization of scalp EEG localizes near encephaloceles, however, typically not in the encephalocele itself; this may be due to scalp EEG sampling propagated activity or alternatively that the seizure onset zone extends beyond the herniated cortex. Surprisingly, we observed increased ESL to encephalocele distances in patients with excellent surgical outcomes. Larger cohort studies including intracranial EEG data are needed to further explore this finding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Tethered Cord Syndrome Surgery: Predictive Values and Clinical Outcome. Direct (D)-Wave Monitoring Enhancement With Subdural Electrode Placement: A Case Series. Survey of Continuous EEG Monitoring Practices in the United States. A Proposed Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Nomenclature and Call for Standardization. The Fingerprint of Scalp-EEG in Drug-Resistant Frontal Lobe Epilepsies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1