在激素替代周期中,使用400mg阴道孕酮的单个子宫托进行胚胎移植当天的孕酮水平与200mg x2个子宫托相比。

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20230021
Alicia Herencia, Andrea Bernabeu, Anna Pitas, Jose Antonio Ortiz, Cristina Gavilán, Sonia Albero, Juan Carlos Castillo, Rafael Bernabeu
{"title":"在激素替代周期中,使用400mg阴道孕酮的单个子宫托进行胚胎移植当天的孕酮水平与200mg x2个子宫托相比。","authors":"Alicia Herencia, Andrea Bernabeu, Anna Pitas, Jose Antonio Ortiz, Cristina Gavilán, Sonia Albero, Juan Carlos Castillo, Rafael Bernabeu","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20230021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Does the use of 400mg pessaries of micronized progesterone provide comparable results as pessaries of 200mg x2, in terms of progesterone levels in hormonal replacement cycles for embryo transfer?.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study based on 299 embryo transfer treatments under artificial endometrial preparation carried out at Instituto Bernabeu. 131 patients received 1 pessary of 400 mg b.i.d. (group A) and 168 received 2 pessaries of 200 mg b.i.d. (group B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean serum progesterone levels were similar between groups (A: 13.64±4.47ng/mL vs. B: 13.88±7.17ng/mL). There were no differences in suboptimal progesterone levels between groups (A: 11.5% vs. B: 16.8%). In terms of patients receiving additional progesterone supplementation, there were no differences between groups (A: 26% vs. B: 35.3%.). No differences between groups were observed in clinical outcomes: pregnancy rate (PR) (A: 55% vs. B: 54.8%), biochemical pregnancy loss rate (BPLR) (A: 13.4% vs. B: 17.6%), miscarriage rate (MR) (A: 17.9% vs. B: 19.8%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) (A: 36.5% vs. B: 34.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One progesterone pessary of 400mg (Cyclogest®) twice daily appears to be non-inferior to the use of two-200mg pessaries twice daily in terms of progesterone levels in HRT cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer using a single pessary of 400mg of vaginal progesterone vs. 200mg x2 pessaries in hormonal replacement cycles.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Herencia, Andrea Bernabeu, Anna Pitas, Jose Antonio Ortiz, Cristina Gavilán, Sonia Albero, Juan Carlos Castillo, Rafael Bernabeu\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20230021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Does the use of 400mg pessaries of micronized progesterone provide comparable results as pessaries of 200mg x2, in terms of progesterone levels in hormonal replacement cycles for embryo transfer?.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study based on 299 embryo transfer treatments under artificial endometrial preparation carried out at Instituto Bernabeu. 131 patients received 1 pessary of 400 mg b.i.d. (group A) and 168 received 2 pessaries of 200 mg b.i.d. (group B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean serum progesterone levels were similar between groups (A: 13.64±4.47ng/mL vs. B: 13.88±7.17ng/mL). There were no differences in suboptimal progesterone levels between groups (A: 11.5% vs. B: 16.8%). In terms of patients receiving additional progesterone supplementation, there were no differences between groups (A: 26% vs. B: 35.3%.). No differences between groups were observed in clinical outcomes: pregnancy rate (PR) (A: 55% vs. B: 54.8%), biochemical pregnancy loss rate (BPLR) (A: 13.4% vs. B: 17.6%), miscarriage rate (MR) (A: 17.9% vs. B: 19.8%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) (A: 36.5% vs. B: 34.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One progesterone pessary of 400mg (Cyclogest®) twice daily appears to be non-inferior to the use of two-200mg pessaries twice daily in terms of progesterone levels in HRT cycles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718533/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:就胚胎移植激素替代周期中的孕酮水平而言,使用400mg微粉化孕酮子宫颈是否能提供与200mgx2子宫颈相当的结果?。方法:在伯纳乌研究所进行的299例人工子宫内膜制备胚胎移植治疗的回顾性队列研究。131名患者接受了1个400 mg b.i.d.的子宫颈托(A组),168名患者接受2个200 mg b.i.d.的子宫颈栓(b组)。结果:两组之间的平均血清孕酮水平相似(A:13.64±4.47ng/mL vs.B:13.88±7.17ng/mL)。两组之间次优孕酮水平没有差异(A:11.5%vs.B:16.8%)。在接受额外孕酮补充的患者方面,两组之间没有差异(A:26%vs。临床结果:妊娠率(PR)(A:55%vs.B:54.8%)、生化妊娠损失率(BPLR)(A:13.4%vs.B:17.6%)、流产率(MR)(A:37.9%vs.B:19.8%)和持续妊娠率(OPR)(A:66.5%vs。B:34.1%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer using a single pessary of 400mg of vaginal progesterone vs. 200mg x2 pessaries in hormonal replacement cycles.

Objective: Does the use of 400mg pessaries of micronized progesterone provide comparable results as pessaries of 200mg x2, in terms of progesterone levels in hormonal replacement cycles for embryo transfer?.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study based on 299 embryo transfer treatments under artificial endometrial preparation carried out at Instituto Bernabeu. 131 patients received 1 pessary of 400 mg b.i.d. (group A) and 168 received 2 pessaries of 200 mg b.i.d. (group B).

Results: Mean serum progesterone levels were similar between groups (A: 13.64±4.47ng/mL vs. B: 13.88±7.17ng/mL). There were no differences in suboptimal progesterone levels between groups (A: 11.5% vs. B: 16.8%). In terms of patients receiving additional progesterone supplementation, there were no differences between groups (A: 26% vs. B: 35.3%.). No differences between groups were observed in clinical outcomes: pregnancy rate (PR) (A: 55% vs. B: 54.8%), biochemical pregnancy loss rate (BPLR) (A: 13.4% vs. B: 17.6%), miscarriage rate (MR) (A: 17.9% vs. B: 19.8%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) (A: 36.5% vs. B: 34.1%).

Conclusions: One progesterone pessary of 400mg (Cyclogest®) twice daily appears to be non-inferior to the use of two-200mg pessaries twice daily in terms of progesterone levels in HRT cycles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Deleterious Effects of Caffeine Consumption on Reproductive Functions of Female Wistar Rats. Effect of β-caryophyllene on Sperm Cryopreservation. Poster Presentation - REDLARA Congress Andean Region 2024 - Santiago - Chile. The effect of single dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist injection in frozen-thawed embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of astaxanthin supplementation during vitrification and liquid nitrogen vapor freezing on motility, morphology, survival, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and DNA fragmentation of post-cryopreserved human sperm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1