Hiba A Alshaiba, Nadia Khalifa, Zeina Al Doory, Hatem M El-Damanhoury
{"title":"不同整体CAD/CAM作为髋臼树脂或钴铬可移除部分义齿支架基牙的耐磨性、疲劳性和断裂性。","authors":"Hiba A Alshaiba, Nadia Khalifa, Zeina Al Doory, Hatem M El-Damanhoury","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess wear, fatigue, and fracture resistance of different CAD/CAM onlays milled from monolithic zirconia (ZR), hybrid ceramic (EN), and lithium disilicate (LS) when used as abutments for removable partial denture frameworks fabricated from acetal resin (AR) or cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Standard onlays and RPD framework were designed and milled using CAD/CAM. Onlays were cemented with resin cement to identical teeth models. The RPD's occlusal rest surface and the ceramic onlays' rest seats were both 3D scanned before and aPer 750,000 mechanical load cycles (50 N) and 8,000 thermal cycles (5° to 55°C) in a chewing simulator. The volumetric loss was measured using 3D-image processing software, and the failure of the samples was detected using a stereomicroscope. The fracture resistance was tested by loading to failure in a universal testing machine. The fatigue failure results were analyzed with Fisher exact probability test, and the wear and fracture resistance data were analyzed using twoway ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference (P < .05) was found between the tested experimental groups in wear, fatigue, and fracture resistance. Zr/Co-Cr combinations exhibited the least wear and the highest fatigue and fracture resistance (P < .05), while the highest wear and least fatigue and fracture resistance were recorded for the EN/AR group (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zr onlays demonstrated a conserva+ve treatment option with superior mechanical behavior when used as an onlay abutment, regardless of the RPD framework material used. The AR framework is not recommended in the posterior region for removable partial dentures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"228-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WEAR, FATIGUE, AND FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT MONOLITHIC CAD/CAM ONLAYS AS ABUTMENTS FOR ACETAL RESIN OR COBALT-CHROMIUM REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE FRAMEWORKS.\",\"authors\":\"Hiba A Alshaiba, Nadia Khalifa, Zeina Al Doory, Hatem M El-Damanhoury\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess wear, fatigue, and fracture resistance of different CAD/CAM onlays milled from monolithic zirconia (ZR), hybrid ceramic (EN), and lithium disilicate (LS) when used as abutments for removable partial denture frameworks fabricated from acetal resin (AR) or cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Standard onlays and RPD framework were designed and milled using CAD/CAM. Onlays were cemented with resin cement to identical teeth models. The RPD's occlusal rest surface and the ceramic onlays' rest seats were both 3D scanned before and aPer 750,000 mechanical load cycles (50 N) and 8,000 thermal cycles (5° to 55°C) in a chewing simulator. The volumetric loss was measured using 3D-image processing software, and the failure of the samples was detected using a stereomicroscope. The fracture resistance was tested by loading to failure in a universal testing machine. The fatigue failure results were analyzed with Fisher exact probability test, and the wear and fracture resistance data were analyzed using twoway ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference (P < .05) was found between the tested experimental groups in wear, fatigue, and fracture resistance. Zr/Co-Cr combinations exhibited the least wear and the highest fatigue and fracture resistance (P < .05), while the highest wear and least fatigue and fracture resistance were recorded for the EN/AR group (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zr onlays demonstrated a conserva+ve treatment option with superior mechanical behavior when used as an onlay abutment, regardless of the RPD framework material used. The AR framework is not recommended in the posterior region for removable partial dentures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"228-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估由整体氧化锆(Zr)、混合陶瓷(EN)和二硅酸锂(LS)研磨而成的不同CAD/CAM嵌件在用作由缩醛树脂(AR)或钴铬(Co-Cr)制成的可摘局部义齿框架的基牙时的耐磨性、疲劳性和抗断裂性。方法:使用CAD/CAM设计和研磨标准嵌件和RPD框架。Onlyes用树脂粘固剂粘固到相同的牙齿模型上。在咀嚼模拟器中,在750000次机械载荷循环(50N)和8000次热循环(5-55°C)前后,对RPD的咬合休息表面和陶瓷支架的休息座进行3D扫描。使用3D图像处理软件测量体积损失,并使用立体显微镜检测样品的故障。在通用试验机中通过加载至失效来测试断裂阻力。疲劳失效结果采用Fisher精确概率检验进行分析,耐磨损性和抗断裂性数据采用双向方差分析和Bonferroni Post hoc检验进行分析(P结果:显著差异(P结论:无论使用何种RPD框架材料,Zr基牙在用作基牙时都表现出了良好的机械性能,是一种保守的治疗选择。不建议在可摘局部义齿的后部区域使用AR框架。
WEAR, FATIGUE, AND FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT MONOLITHIC CAD/CAM ONLAYS AS ABUTMENTS FOR ACETAL RESIN OR COBALT-CHROMIUM REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE FRAMEWORKS.
Purpose: To assess wear, fatigue, and fracture resistance of different CAD/CAM onlays milled from monolithic zirconia (ZR), hybrid ceramic (EN), and lithium disilicate (LS) when used as abutments for removable partial denture frameworks fabricated from acetal resin (AR) or cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr).
Materials and methods: Standard onlays and RPD framework were designed and milled using CAD/CAM. Onlays were cemented with resin cement to identical teeth models. The RPD's occlusal rest surface and the ceramic onlays' rest seats were both 3D scanned before and aPer 750,000 mechanical load cycles (50 N) and 8,000 thermal cycles (5° to 55°C) in a chewing simulator. The volumetric loss was measured using 3D-image processing software, and the failure of the samples was detected using a stereomicroscope. The fracture resistance was tested by loading to failure in a universal testing machine. The fatigue failure results were analyzed with Fisher exact probability test, and the wear and fracture resistance data were analyzed using twoway ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (P < .05).
Results: A significant difference (P < .05) was found between the tested experimental groups in wear, fatigue, and fracture resistance. Zr/Co-Cr combinations exhibited the least wear and the highest fatigue and fracture resistance (P < .05), while the highest wear and least fatigue and fracture resistance were recorded for the EN/AR group (P < .05).
Conclusions: Zr onlays demonstrated a conserva+ve treatment option with superior mechanical behavior when used as an onlay abutment, regardless of the RPD framework material used. The AR framework is not recommended in the posterior region for removable partial dentures.