在二元听力任务中添加单耳和双耳噪声的效果。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2181-2398
Carrie Ann Moritz Clancy, Alyssa Davidson, Mark Borgstrom, Kiana Robinson, Frank Musiek
{"title":"在二元听力任务中添加单耳和双耳噪声的效果。","authors":"Carrie Ann Moritz Clancy,&nbsp;Alyssa Davidson,&nbsp;Mark Borgstrom,&nbsp;Kiana Robinson,&nbsp;Frank Musiek","doi":"10.1055/a-2181-2398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dichotic Digits Test (DDT) evaluates central auditory nervous system (CANS) dysfunction. The DDT is widely used in audiology clinics worldwide because it is clinically efficient and has good sensitivity and specificity for CANS lesions. However, the DDT shows a strong ceiling effect, which can mitigate its ability to detect subtle CANS dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the effects of adding monaural and binaural speech-spectrum noise to the DDT in an effort to make the test more taxing to the CANS and thereby reduce the observed ceiling effect.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This was an experimental repeated measures study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The participants were 20 adults aged 18-50 years with normal, bilaterally symmetric peripheral hearing sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Each participant was administered one standard DDT test list (no noise added) and DDT test lists with binaural, monaural right, and monaural left noise added. For each of the noise-added conditions, lists were administered at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), for a grand total of seven DDT test lists per participant, presented in randomized order. Monaural and binaural noise effects on DDT scoring indices (Right and Left Ear Percent Correct Scores, Combined Total Percent Correct Scores, and Dichotic Difference Scores), as well as noise effects on the Right Ear Advantage (REA) for speech, were examined. Mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to examine fixed effects and interactions of Noise Condition and Ear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adding noise to the standard DDT systematically reduced Right and Left Ear Percent Correct Scores and Combined Total Percent Correct Scores. Statistically significant differences on all indices were found between monaural and binaural noise-added conditions, suggesting a possible advantage for binaural listening in noise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that adding noise to tests of dichotic listening increases the difficulty of the task, and that further investigation of dichotic listening patterns in noise could potentially lead to more sensitive clinical evaluations of CANS integrity and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Adding Monaural and Binaural Noise to a Dichotic Listening Task.\",\"authors\":\"Carrie Ann Moritz Clancy,&nbsp;Alyssa Davidson,&nbsp;Mark Borgstrom,&nbsp;Kiana Robinson,&nbsp;Frank Musiek\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2181-2398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Dichotic Digits Test (DDT) evaluates central auditory nervous system (CANS) dysfunction. The DDT is widely used in audiology clinics worldwide because it is clinically efficient and has good sensitivity and specificity for CANS lesions. However, the DDT shows a strong ceiling effect, which can mitigate its ability to detect subtle CANS dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the effects of adding monaural and binaural speech-spectrum noise to the DDT in an effort to make the test more taxing to the CANS and thereby reduce the observed ceiling effect.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This was an experimental repeated measures study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The participants were 20 adults aged 18-50 years with normal, bilaterally symmetric peripheral hearing sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Each participant was administered one standard DDT test list (no noise added) and DDT test lists with binaural, monaural right, and monaural left noise added. For each of the noise-added conditions, lists were administered at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), for a grand total of seven DDT test lists per participant, presented in randomized order. Monaural and binaural noise effects on DDT scoring indices (Right and Left Ear Percent Correct Scores, Combined Total Percent Correct Scores, and Dichotic Difference Scores), as well as noise effects on the Right Ear Advantage (REA) for speech, were examined. Mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to examine fixed effects and interactions of Noise Condition and Ear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adding noise to the standard DDT systematically reduced Right and Left Ear Percent Correct Scores and Combined Total Percent Correct Scores. Statistically significant differences on all indices were found between monaural and binaural noise-added conditions, suggesting a possible advantage for binaural listening in noise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that adding noise to tests of dichotic listening increases the difficulty of the task, and that further investigation of dichotic listening patterns in noise could potentially lead to more sensitive clinical evaluations of CANS integrity and function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-2398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-2398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:二分数字测试(DDT)评估中枢听觉神经系统(CANS)功能障碍。DDT在世界各地的听力学诊所中被广泛使用,因为它在临床上是有效的,并且对CANS病变具有良好的敏感性和特异性。然而,滴滴涕表现出强烈的上限效应,这可以降低其检测细微CANS功能障碍的能力。目的:本研究考察了在DDT中添加单耳和双耳语音频谱噪声的影响,以使测试对CANS更费力,从而减少观察到的上限效应。研究设计:这是一项实验性的重复测量研究。研究样本:参与者为20名18-50岁的成年人,具有正常的双侧对称外周听力敏感性。数据收集和分析:每个参与者都接受了一份标准滴滴涕测试清单(不添加噪音)和一份添加了双耳、单耳右侧和单耳左侧噪音的滴滴涕测试清单。对于每种添加噪声的条件,以两种不同的信噪比(SNR)进行列表管理,每个参与者总共有七份滴滴涕测试列表,以随机顺序呈现。研究了单耳和双耳噪声对DDT评分指数(右耳和左耳百分比正确分数、综合总百分比正确分数和二分法差异分数)的影响,以及噪声对右耳语音优势(REA)的影响。采用混合模型方差分析(ANOVA)检验了噪声条件和耳朵的固定效应和相互作用。在添加单耳和双耳噪声的条件下,所有指标都存在统计学上的显著差异,这表明双耳听力在噪声中可能具有优势。结论:这些发现表明,在二分听测试中添加噪声会增加任务的难度,进一步研究噪声中的二分听模式可能会对CANS的完整性和功能进行更敏感的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Adding Monaural and Binaural Noise to a Dichotic Listening Task.

Background: The Dichotic Digits Test (DDT) evaluates central auditory nervous system (CANS) dysfunction. The DDT is widely used in audiology clinics worldwide because it is clinically efficient and has good sensitivity and specificity for CANS lesions. However, the DDT shows a strong ceiling effect, which can mitigate its ability to detect subtle CANS dysfunction.

Purpose: This study examines the effects of adding monaural and binaural speech-spectrum noise to the DDT in an effort to make the test more taxing to the CANS and thereby reduce the observed ceiling effect.

Research design: This was an experimental repeated measures study.

Study sample: The participants were 20 adults aged 18-50 years with normal, bilaterally symmetric peripheral hearing sensitivity.

Data collection and analysis: Each participant was administered one standard DDT test list (no noise added) and DDT test lists with binaural, monaural right, and monaural left noise added. For each of the noise-added conditions, lists were administered at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), for a grand total of seven DDT test lists per participant, presented in randomized order. Monaural and binaural noise effects on DDT scoring indices (Right and Left Ear Percent Correct Scores, Combined Total Percent Correct Scores, and Dichotic Difference Scores), as well as noise effects on the Right Ear Advantage (REA) for speech, were examined. Mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to examine fixed effects and interactions of Noise Condition and Ear.

Results: Adding noise to the standard DDT systematically reduced Right and Left Ear Percent Correct Scores and Combined Total Percent Correct Scores. Statistically significant differences on all indices were found between monaural and binaural noise-added conditions, suggesting a possible advantage for binaural listening in noise.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that adding noise to tests of dichotic listening increases the difficulty of the task, and that further investigation of dichotic listening patterns in noise could potentially lead to more sensitive clinical evaluations of CANS integrity and function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Location of Focal Traumatic Brain Injury and Canal Involved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. The Effect of COVID-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults. Increased Perception of Head Tilt to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Correlates to Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Vestibular Migraine. A Comparison of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials via Audiometric and Nonaudiometric Bone Vibrators. Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1