国际医学毕业生和英国医学毕业生在推荐适合执业方面存在差异的确切原因是什么?

Q2 Medicine Medico-Legal Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1177/00258172231184551
Vedamurthy Adhiyaman, Peter Hobson, Radha Sundaram, Llinos Williams
{"title":"国际医学毕业生和英国医学毕业生在推荐适合执业方面存在差异的确切原因是什么?","authors":"Vedamurthy Adhiyaman, Peter Hobson, Radha Sundaram, Llinos Williams","doi":"10.1177/00258172231184551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>To discover the precise reasons for referring a doctor to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, and whether there are any disparities between referrals of international medical graduates and UK graduates. Further to consider whether understanding the precise reasons would provide insight into the nature of referrals.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We collected and analysed the data from the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service website over a period of 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 228 cases of which 142 (62%) were international medical graduates and 86 (38%) were UK graduates. More international medical graduates were referred for professional misconduct, poor performance and lack of adequate English language. The common reasons for professional misconduct were providing sub-optimal care, sexual misconduct and dishonest behaviour. More UK graduates were referred following convictions due to offences related to alcohol intake and financial dishonesty. There is paucity of good quality information to identify the exact reasons for the disparity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More international medical graduates were referred to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service than UK graduates. There was disparity in the nature of the referrals and we hope our findings will inform employers and the regulatory bodies to understand that comprehensive induction, inclusion, mentoring and adjustments are needed to support international medical graduates to mitigate the risks of failure and help them to meet the required professional standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":35529,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Legal Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the precise reasons for the disparity in referrals to fitness to practise between international and UK medical graduates?\",\"authors\":\"Vedamurthy Adhiyaman, Peter Hobson, Radha Sundaram, Llinos Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00258172231184551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>To discover the precise reasons for referring a doctor to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, and whether there are any disparities between referrals of international medical graduates and UK graduates. Further to consider whether understanding the precise reasons would provide insight into the nature of referrals.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We collected and analysed the data from the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service website over a period of 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 228 cases of which 142 (62%) were international medical graduates and 86 (38%) were UK graduates. More international medical graduates were referred for professional misconduct, poor performance and lack of adequate English language. The common reasons for professional misconduct were providing sub-optimal care, sexual misconduct and dishonest behaviour. More UK graduates were referred following convictions due to offences related to alcohol intake and financial dishonesty. There is paucity of good quality information to identify the exact reasons for the disparity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More international medical graduates were referred to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service than UK graduates. There was disparity in the nature of the referrals and we hope our findings will inform employers and the regulatory bodies to understand that comprehensive induction, inclusion, mentoring and adjustments are needed to support international medical graduates to mitigate the risks of failure and help them to meet the required professional standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medico-Legal Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medico-Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172231184551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172231184551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:了解将医生转介至执业医师法庭服务的确切原因,以及国际医学毕业生和英国毕业生的转介之间是否存在任何差异。进一步考虑了解确切原因是否能深入了解转介的性质。研究设计:我们从执业医师法庭服务网站收集并分析了12个月的数据。结果:共有228例病例,其中142例(62%)为国际医学毕业生,86例(38%)为英国毕业生。越来越多的国际医学毕业生因职业不端、表现不佳和缺乏足够的英语而被转介。职业不端行为的常见原因是提供不理想的护理、性不端行为和不诚实行为。更多的英国毕业生在因饮酒和财务不诚实而被定罪后被转介。缺乏高质量的信息来确定差距的确切原因。结论:与英国毕业生相比,更多的国际医学毕业生被转介到执业医师法庭服务。转介的性质存在差异,我们希望我们的调查结果能让雇主和监管机构明白,需要全面的入职、包容、指导和调整,以支持国际医学毕业生降低失败风险,并帮助他们达到所需的专业标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are the precise reasons for the disparity in referrals to fitness to practise between international and UK medical graduates?

Purpose of the study: To discover the precise reasons for referring a doctor to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, and whether there are any disparities between referrals of international medical graduates and UK graduates. Further to consider whether understanding the precise reasons would provide insight into the nature of referrals.

Study design: We collected and analysed the data from the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service website over a period of 12 months.

Results: There were 228 cases of which 142 (62%) were international medical graduates and 86 (38%) were UK graduates. More international medical graduates were referred for professional misconduct, poor performance and lack of adequate English language. The common reasons for professional misconduct were providing sub-optimal care, sexual misconduct and dishonest behaviour. More UK graduates were referred following convictions due to offences related to alcohol intake and financial dishonesty. There is paucity of good quality information to identify the exact reasons for the disparity.

Conclusion: More international medical graduates were referred to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service than UK graduates. There was disparity in the nature of the referrals and we hope our findings will inform employers and the regulatory bodies to understand that comprehensive induction, inclusion, mentoring and adjustments are needed to support international medical graduates to mitigate the risks of failure and help them to meet the required professional standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medico-Legal Journal
Medico-Legal Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Medico-Legal journal is the official journal of Medico-Legal Society. The Royal Society of Medicine Press is delighted to announce the launch in July 2009 of the Medico-Legal journal, on behalf of the Medico-Legal Society. The Medico-Legal Journal provides an official record of the proceedings of the Medico-Legal Society, and is dedicated to promoting Medico-Legal knowledge in all its aspects. As well as providing a record of activity in the Society, the journal includes a unique collection of contributions and speeches from eminent speakers at society events.
期刊最新文献
Medicine and Law - a view from both sides. Whistleblowing in the NHS - how to best protect oneself from the costs and consequences. Jaw bombs: Rampantly used indigenous explosives causing human-wildlife conflict in a few regions of India and Sri Lanka. The brick kiln child workers of Pakistan. The UK's National Health Service needs to take urgent action to get itself and the nation fitter by focusing on prevention. Dentistry as an example of strategy gone wrong.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1