为临床现场参与临床教育提供循证案例:ASAHP临床教育委员会项目。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Mari Knettle, Julie O'Sullivan-Maillet, Christopher W O'Brien, Felicia Chew, Amber Boyd, Laura Dailey
{"title":"为临床现场参与临床教育提供循证案例:ASAHP临床教育委员会项目。","authors":"Mari Knettle,&nbsp;Julie O'Sullivan-Maillet,&nbsp;Christopher W O'Brien,&nbsp;Felicia Chew,&nbsp;Amber Boyd,&nbsp;Laura Dailey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"52 3","pages":"e157-e161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Evidence-Based Case for Clinical Site Participation in Clinical Education: An ASAHP Clinical Education Committee Project.\",\"authors\":\"Mari Knettle,&nbsp;Julie O'Sullivan-Maillet,&nbsp;Christopher W O'Brien,&nbsp;Felicia Chew,&nbsp;Amber Boyd,&nbsp;Laura Dailey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"e157-e161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床教育场地的竞争是联合健康教育学术项目面临的一个已知挑战,临床场地报告了拒绝参加临床教育的各种原因。2022年,学校促进健康专业协会的临床教育工作组(现为临床教育委员会,CEC)启动了一个项目,目的是创建一个循证资源,供多个专业使用,以支持现场参与临床教育。方法:进行文献检索,以确定当代发表的关于学生临床教育安置在临床场所的积极影响的作品。对这些出版物进行了审查,确定了四个总体主题:学生增值、生产力、导师感知和患者感知。结果:创建了一张一页的信息图,展示了四个确定的主题。嵌入信息图中的二维码链接到主题所基于的引文。结论:CEC创建的一页资源可用于构建关于参与临床教育的对话,将益处的断言从轶事提升为基于发表的声明。资源是动态的,因为它可以随着新信息的出现和其他信息的过时而不断更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making the Evidence-Based Case for Clinical Site Participation in Clinical Education: An ASAHP Clinical Education Committee Project.

Background: Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception.

Results: A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based.

Conclusion: The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Education Intervention: A Pilot Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-Paced Intervention to Prevent Burnout in Physician Assistant Students. Allied Health Collaborative Practice Capability: A Coalescence of Capabilities. Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective. Factors Contributing to Physical Therapist Attrition: A Qualitative Study. How Do Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Perceive the Title Change from Physician Assistant to Physician Associate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1