Mari Knettle, Julie O'Sullivan-Maillet, Christopher W O'Brien, Felicia Chew, Amber Boyd, Laura Dailey
{"title":"为临床现场参与临床教育提供循证案例:ASAHP临床教育委员会项目。","authors":"Mari Knettle, Julie O'Sullivan-Maillet, Christopher W O'Brien, Felicia Chew, Amber Boyd, Laura Dailey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"52 3","pages":"e157-e161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Evidence-Based Case for Clinical Site Participation in Clinical Education: An ASAHP Clinical Education Committee Project.\",\"authors\":\"Mari Knettle, Julie O'Sullivan-Maillet, Christopher W O'Brien, Felicia Chew, Amber Boyd, Laura Dailey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"e157-e161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Making the Evidence-Based Case for Clinical Site Participation in Clinical Education: An ASAHP Clinical Education Committee Project.
Background: Competition for clinical education sites is a known challenge for academic programs in allied health education with clinical sites reporting a variety of reasons for declining to participate in clinical education. In 2022, the Clinical Education Task Force (now Clinical Education Committee, CEC) of the Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions embarked on a project with the objective of creating an evidence-based resource that could be used by multiple professions to support the case for site participation in clinical education.
Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify contemporary published works on the positive impact of student clinical education placements on clinical sites. The publications were reviewed and four overarching themes were identified: students add value, productivity, preceptor perception, and patient perception.
Results: A one-page infographic was created to feature the four identified themes. A QR code embedded into the infographic links to the citations on which the themes are based.
Conclusion: The one-page resource created by the CEC can be used to frame conversations about participation in clinical education, elevating the assertion of benefits from anecdotal to published-based claims. The resource is dynamic, as it can be updated continually as new information emerges and other information becomes outdated.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.