使用PRESTO评估成年人工耳蜗用户的高变异性语音识别。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2181-2652
Terrin N Tamati, Kathleen F Faulkner, David Pisoni
{"title":"使用PRESTO评估成年人工耳蜗用户的高变异性语音识别。","authors":"Terrin N Tamati,&nbsp;Kathleen F Faulkner,&nbsp;David Pisoni","doi":"10.1055/a-2181-2652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Speech recognition in adult cochlear implant (CI) users is typically assessed using sentence materials with low talker variability. Little is known about the effects of talker variability on speech recognition in adult CI users, the factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition with high talker variability, or how sentence materials with high talker variability could be utilized clinically.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effects of talker variability on sentence recognition in adult CI users, using sentences from the Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-Set (PRESTO), and to examine the relation between working memory capacity and high-variability speech recognition.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Postlingually deafened adult CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners under CI simulation completed sentence recognition tests that contained varying levels of talker variability, including HINT (low-variability), AzBio (moderate-variability), and PRESTO sentences (high-variability). The tasks were completed in both quiet and multi-talker babble (MTB). For the adult CI users only, the relation between sentence recognition accuracy and working memory capacity was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users and 35 NH adults under 8-channel acoustic noise-vocoder simulations of CI hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both CI and NH groups, performance decreased as a function of increased talker variability, with the best scores obtained on HINT (low-variability), then AzBio (moderate-variability), followed by PRESTO (high-variability) in quiet. In MTB, performance was significantly lower on PRESTO sentences, compared to HINT and AzBio sentences, which were not significantly different. Working memory capacity in the CI users was related to sentence recognition accuracy across all materials and conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from the current study suggest that the increased talker variability in the PRESTO sentence materials has a detrimental effect on speech recognition in both adult CI users and NH listeners under CI simulation, particularly when speech is further degraded by MTB. For adult CI users, working memory capacity contributes to speech recognition abilities. Sentence recognition testing with high-variability, multi-talker materials, as in PRESTO, provides robust assessment of speech recognition abilities for research and clinical application, generating a wide range of scores for evaluating individual differences without ceiling effects when compared to conventional low-variability sentences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of High-variability Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users using PRESTO.\",\"authors\":\"Terrin N Tamati,&nbsp;Kathleen F Faulkner,&nbsp;David Pisoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2181-2652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Speech recognition in adult cochlear implant (CI) users is typically assessed using sentence materials with low talker variability. Little is known about the effects of talker variability on speech recognition in adult CI users, the factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition with high talker variability, or how sentence materials with high talker variability could be utilized clinically.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effects of talker variability on sentence recognition in adult CI users, using sentences from the Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-Set (PRESTO), and to examine the relation between working memory capacity and high-variability speech recognition.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Postlingually deafened adult CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners under CI simulation completed sentence recognition tests that contained varying levels of talker variability, including HINT (low-variability), AzBio (moderate-variability), and PRESTO sentences (high-variability). The tasks were completed in both quiet and multi-talker babble (MTB). For the adult CI users only, the relation between sentence recognition accuracy and working memory capacity was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users and 35 NH adults under 8-channel acoustic noise-vocoder simulations of CI hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both CI and NH groups, performance decreased as a function of increased talker variability, with the best scores obtained on HINT (low-variability), then AzBio (moderate-variability), followed by PRESTO (high-variability) in quiet. In MTB, performance was significantly lower on PRESTO sentences, compared to HINT and AzBio sentences, which were not significantly different. Working memory capacity in the CI users was related to sentence recognition accuracy across all materials and conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from the current study suggest that the increased talker variability in the PRESTO sentence materials has a detrimental effect on speech recognition in both adult CI users and NH listeners under CI simulation, particularly when speech is further degraded by MTB. For adult CI users, working memory capacity contributes to speech recognition abilities. Sentence recognition testing with high-variability, multi-talker materials, as in PRESTO, provides robust assessment of speech recognition abilities for research and clinical application, generating a wide range of scores for evaluating individual differences without ceiling effects when compared to conventional low-variability sentences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-2652\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-2652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:成人人工耳蜗(CI)用户的语音识别通常使用说话者变异性低的句子材料进行评估。关于说话者变异性对成年CI用户语音识别的影响、说话者变异性高的语音识别中个体差异的潜在因素,或者具有说话者变异性的句子材料如何在临床上使用,我们知之甚少。目的:利用感知鲁棒英语句子测试开放集(PRESTO)中的句子,研究说话人变异性对成年CI用户句子识别的影响,并探讨工作记忆能力与高变异性语音识别之间的关系。研究设计:在CI模拟下,耳聋的成年CI用户和听力正常(NH)听众完成了句子识别测试,其中包含不同水平的说话者变异性,包括HINT(低变异性)、AzBio(中等变异性)和PRESTO句子(高变异性)。这些任务是在安静和多语者的胡言乱语(MTB)中完成的。仅针对成年CI用户,评估了句子识别准确性与工作记忆能力之间的关系。研究样本:在8通道声码器模拟CI听力的情况下,20名成年CI用户和35名NH成年人在舌后失聪。结果:在CI和NH组中,表现都随着谈话者变异性的增加而下降,在安静状态下,HINT(低变异性)得分最高,然后是AzBio(中等变异性),其次是PRESTO(高变异性)。在MTB中,与没有显著差异的HINT和AzBio句子相比,PRESTO句子的表现显著较低。CI用户的工作记忆能力与所有材料和条件下的句子识别准确性有关。结论:当前研究的结果表明,在CI模拟下,PRESTO句子材料中说话者可变性的增加对成年CI用户和NH听众的语音识别都有不利影响,尤其是当MTB进一步降低语音时。对于成年CI用户来说,工作记忆能力有助于提高语音识别能力。与传统的低变异性句子相比,具有高变异性、多语言材料的句子识别测试,如PRESTO,为研究和临床应用提供了对语音识别能力的有力评估,产生了广泛的分数来评估个体差异,而没有上限效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of High-variability Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users using PRESTO.

Background: Speech recognition in adult cochlear implant (CI) users is typically assessed using sentence materials with low talker variability. Little is known about the effects of talker variability on speech recognition in adult CI users, the factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition with high talker variability, or how sentence materials with high talker variability could be utilized clinically.

Purpose: To examine the effects of talker variability on sentence recognition in adult CI users, using sentences from the Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-Set (PRESTO), and to examine the relation between working memory capacity and high-variability speech recognition.

Research design: Postlingually deafened adult CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners under CI simulation completed sentence recognition tests that contained varying levels of talker variability, including HINT (low-variability), AzBio (moderate-variability), and PRESTO sentences (high-variability). The tasks were completed in both quiet and multi-talker babble (MTB). For the adult CI users only, the relation between sentence recognition accuracy and working memory capacity was assessed.

Study sample: Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users and 35 NH adults under 8-channel acoustic noise-vocoder simulations of CI hearing.

Results: In both CI and NH groups, performance decreased as a function of increased talker variability, with the best scores obtained on HINT (low-variability), then AzBio (moderate-variability), followed by PRESTO (high-variability) in quiet. In MTB, performance was significantly lower on PRESTO sentences, compared to HINT and AzBio sentences, which were not significantly different. Working memory capacity in the CI users was related to sentence recognition accuracy across all materials and conditions.

Conclusions: Findings from the current study suggest that the increased talker variability in the PRESTO sentence materials has a detrimental effect on speech recognition in both adult CI users and NH listeners under CI simulation, particularly when speech is further degraded by MTB. For adult CI users, working memory capacity contributes to speech recognition abilities. Sentence recognition testing with high-variability, multi-talker materials, as in PRESTO, provides robust assessment of speech recognition abilities for research and clinical application, generating a wide range of scores for evaluating individual differences without ceiling effects when compared to conventional low-variability sentences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Location of Focal Traumatic Brain Injury and Canal Involved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. The Effect of COVID-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults. Increased Perception of Head Tilt to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Correlates to Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Vestibular Migraine. A Comparison of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials via Audiometric and Nonaudiometric Bone Vibrators. Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1