早产与辅助生殖技术之间的联系。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomedical Papers-Olomouc Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.5507/bp.2023.039
Anna Stastna, Eva Waldaufova, Tomas Fait
{"title":"早产与辅助生殖技术之间的联系。","authors":"Anna Stastna, Eva Waldaufova, Tomas Fait","doi":"10.5507/bp.2023.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine whether the risk of preterm births differs according to the conception method: with or without ART and according to the ART method used (in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) with fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer (FET) and oocyte receipt (OoR)).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research is based on individualised anonymised data on deliveries in Czechia in 2013-2018 (n=651,049) obtained from the National Health Information System. We employ the survival analysis approach applying survival functions (Life tables method) and Cox regression to model the risk of preterm births according to the conception method when controlling for a set of covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the risk of preterm births in singleton pregnancies is higher for ART-treated women (1.56 to 2.06 depending on the ART method) than for non-ART-treated women. The proportion of preterm births differs according to the ART method; the highest proportion was observed for OoR mothers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the differences between ART-treated mothers according to the conception method are due mainly to the structural differences between mothers. When controlling for the covariates (Cox regression model), no significant differences were observed concerning the risk of preterm births for women who underwent fresh IVF, FET and OoR.</p>","PeriodicalId":55363,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","volume":" ","pages":"332-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between preterm births and assisted reproductive technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Stastna, Eva Waldaufova, Tomas Fait\",\"doi\":\"10.5507/bp.2023.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine whether the risk of preterm births differs according to the conception method: with or without ART and according to the ART method used (in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) with fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer (FET) and oocyte receipt (OoR)).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research is based on individualised anonymised data on deliveries in Czechia in 2013-2018 (n=651,049) obtained from the National Health Information System. We employ the survival analysis approach applying survival functions (Life tables method) and Cox regression to model the risk of preterm births according to the conception method when controlling for a set of covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the risk of preterm births in singleton pregnancies is higher for ART-treated women (1.56 to 2.06 depending on the ART method) than for non-ART-treated women. The proportion of preterm births differs according to the ART method; the highest proportion was observed for OoR mothers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the differences between ART-treated mothers according to the conception method are due mainly to the structural differences between mothers. When controlling for the covariates (Cox regression model), no significant differences were observed concerning the risk of preterm births for women who underwent fresh IVF, FET and OoR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2023.039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2023.039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定早产的风险是否因受孕方法而不同:使用或不使用ART以及使用的ART方法(体外受精(IVF)、新鲜胚胎移植、冷冻胚胎移植和卵母细胞接受)。方法:该研究基于从国家卫生信息系统获得的2013-2018年捷克分娩的个性化匿名数据(n=651049)。我们采用生存分析方法,应用生存函数(生命表法)和Cox回归,在控制一组协变量时,根据受孕方法对早产风险进行建模。结果:研究结果显示,接受ART治疗的妇女在单胎妊娠中早产的风险(1.56至2.06,取决于ART方法)高于未接受ART治疗妇女。根据ART方法,早产的比例不同;OoR母亲的比例最高。结论:总体而言,根据受孕方法接受ART治疗的母亲之间的差异主要是由于母亲之间的结构差异。当控制协变量(Cox回归模型)时,在接受新鲜试管婴儿、FET和OoR的女性早产风险方面没有观察到显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between preterm births and assisted reproductive technologies.

Aims: The aim of this study is to determine whether the risk of preterm births differs according to the conception method: with or without ART and according to the ART method used (in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) with fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer (FET) and oocyte receipt (OoR)).

Methods: The research is based on individualised anonymised data on deliveries in Czechia in 2013-2018 (n=651,049) obtained from the National Health Information System. We employ the survival analysis approach applying survival functions (Life tables method) and Cox regression to model the risk of preterm births according to the conception method when controlling for a set of covariates.

Results: The results revealed that the risk of preterm births in singleton pregnancies is higher for ART-treated women (1.56 to 2.06 depending on the ART method) than for non-ART-treated women. The proportion of preterm births differs according to the ART method; the highest proportion was observed for OoR mothers.

Conclusions: Overall, the differences between ART-treated mothers according to the conception method are due mainly to the structural differences between mothers. When controlling for the covariates (Cox regression model), no significant differences were observed concerning the risk of preterm births for women who underwent fresh IVF, FET and OoR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Papers is a journal of Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Olomouc, Czech Republic. It includes reviews and original articles reporting on basic and clinical research in medicine. Biomedical Papers is published as one volume per year in four issues.
期刊最新文献
FOXP3, IL-35, and PD-L1 in intra- and peritumoral lymphocytic infiltrate of cutaneous melanomas as an important part of antitumor immunity. Unveiling the predictive power of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: A narrative review focused on clinical outcomes. Uterine artery embolisation in symptomatic patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Induction of supraventricular tachycardias in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is safe and reasonable. Association of biomarkers of cardiac remodeling, myocardial fibrosis and inflammation with parameters of heart function and structure in patients with arterial hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1