泰国功能性内旋量表在肩关节置换术中的有效性和可靠性。

Nattha Kulkamthorn , Tharit Inkaratana , Pattanaket Cheewakongkiat
{"title":"泰国功能性内旋量表在肩关节置换术中的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Nattha Kulkamthorn ,&nbsp;Tharit Inkaratana ,&nbsp;Pattanaket Cheewakongkiat","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Functional Internal Rotation Scale is an excellent clinical tool for evaluating patients with shoulder arthroplasty, but it has not been adapted to the Thai version. The objectives of this study were to translate the English version and culturally adapt the Functional Internal Rotation Scale to the Thai version and to examine the psychometric properties of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale among Thai participants having shoulder arthroplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Functional Internal Rotation Scale was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with shoulder arthroplasty patients. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index (CVI). Criterion validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. An Independent <em>t</em>-test was used to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability over a 14-day interval.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 45 participants, 20 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients and 25 reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) patients, the majority of participants were female (69%) and retired (91%) with a mean age of 72.9 years (SD 9.1). CVI evaluation was acceptable, with a total CVI of 0.92. The correlation of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale with the Thai version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (Thai ASES) and the internal rotation subscale (IR subscale) of the Thai ASES was 0.73 (P &lt; 0.001) and 0.75 (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. For construct validity, TSA patients scored, on average, 10.8 points higher than RSA patients (43.7 vs. 32.9, P &lt; 0.001, 95% confidence interval 6.3–15.3). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale was 0.95. The test-retest reliability revealed excellent reliability (ICC 0.99).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale has good validity and excellent reliability in assessing internal rotation function in Thai shoulder arthroplasty patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Pages 15-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/a5/main.PMC10522889.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Thai functional internal rotation scale for shoulder arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Nattha Kulkamthorn ,&nbsp;Tharit Inkaratana ,&nbsp;Pattanaket Cheewakongkiat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmart.2023.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Functional Internal Rotation Scale is an excellent clinical tool for evaluating patients with shoulder arthroplasty, but it has not been adapted to the Thai version. The objectives of this study were to translate the English version and culturally adapt the Functional Internal Rotation Scale to the Thai version and to examine the psychometric properties of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale among Thai participants having shoulder arthroplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Functional Internal Rotation Scale was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with shoulder arthroplasty patients. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index (CVI). Criterion validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. An Independent <em>t</em>-test was used to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability over a 14-day interval.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 45 participants, 20 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients and 25 reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) patients, the majority of participants were female (69%) and retired (91%) with a mean age of 72.9 years (SD 9.1). CVI evaluation was acceptable, with a total CVI of 0.92. The correlation of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale with the Thai version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (Thai ASES) and the internal rotation subscale (IR subscale) of the Thai ASES was 0.73 (P &lt; 0.001) and 0.75 (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. For construct validity, TSA patients scored, on average, 10.8 points higher than RSA patients (43.7 vs. 32.9, P &lt; 0.001, 95% confidence interval 6.3–15.3). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale was 0.95. The test-retest reliability revealed excellent reliability (ICC 0.99).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale has good validity and excellent reliability in assessing internal rotation function in Thai shoulder arthroplasty patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/a5/main.PMC10522889.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687323000146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687323000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能性内旋量表是评估肩关节置换术患者的优秀临床工具,但尚未适用于泰国版本。本研究的目的是翻译英文版,并将功能性内旋量表从文化上改编为泰语版,并在接受肩部关节成形术的泰国参与者中检验泰语功能性内旋转量表的心理测量特性。方法:按照标准指南,将功能性内旋量表翻译成泰语,包括跨文化适应。对肩关节置换术患者的心理测量特性进行评估。使用内容有效性指数(CVI)评估内容有效性。使用Pearson相关系数评估标准的有效性。使用独立t检验来评估结构的有效性。使用Cronbachα系数评估内部一致性可靠性。组内相关系数(ICC)用于确定14天间隔内的重测可靠性。结果:在45名参与者、20名全肩关节置换术(TSA)患者和25名反肩关节置换手术(RSA)患者中,大多数参与者是女性(69%)和退休(91%),平均年龄为72.9岁(SD 9.1)。CVI评估是可接受的,总CVI为0.92。泰国功能性内旋量表与泰国版美国肩肘外科医生标准化肩部评估表(泰国ASES)和泰国ASES的内旋分量表(IR分量表)的相关性为0.73(P结论:泰式功能性内旋量表在评估泰式肩关节置换术患者内旋功能方面具有良好的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the Thai functional internal rotation scale for shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The Functional Internal Rotation Scale is an excellent clinical tool for evaluating patients with shoulder arthroplasty, but it has not been adapted to the Thai version. The objectives of this study were to translate the English version and culturally adapt the Functional Internal Rotation Scale to the Thai version and to examine the psychometric properties of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale among Thai participants having shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

The Functional Internal Rotation Scale was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with shoulder arthroplasty patients. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index (CVI). Criterion validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. An Independent t-test was used to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability over a 14-day interval.

Results

Of 45 participants, 20 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients and 25 reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) patients, the majority of participants were female (69%) and retired (91%) with a mean age of 72.9 years (SD 9.1). CVI evaluation was acceptable, with a total CVI of 0.92. The correlation of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale with the Thai version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (Thai ASES) and the internal rotation subscale (IR subscale) of the Thai ASES was 0.73 (P < 0.001) and 0.75 (P < 0.001), respectively. For construct validity, TSA patients scored, on average, 10.8 points higher than RSA patients (43.7 vs. 32.9, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 6.3–15.3). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale was 0.95. The test-retest reliability revealed excellent reliability (ICC 0.99).

Conclusion

The Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale has good validity and excellent reliability in assessing internal rotation function in Thai shoulder arthroplasty patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting the therapeutic effects of multiple intra-articular injections of platelet-rich-plasma for knee osteoarthritis Early intervention of extracorporeal shockwave therapy sustained positive long-term effect on rotator cuff healing: A randomized controlled trial with 3-year follow-up The residual laxity of medial collateral ligament after magic point pie crusting MCL released in arthroscopic management of medial meniscus Fast rehabilitation does not worsen clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective comparative study ACL injury characteristics in badminton : A registry study with prospectively collected data on sports related epidemiology and injury mechanism of 539 badminton players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1