埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉尔吉东部育龄妇女产前保健服务利用的错失机会及其相关因素:混合方法研究。

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2023-09-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/8465463
Ibsa Mussa, On Makhubela-Nkondo, Melat B Maruta, Adera Debella
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉尔吉东部育龄妇女产前保健服务利用的错失机会及其相关因素:混合方法研究。","authors":"Ibsa Mussa,&nbsp;On Makhubela-Nkondo,&nbsp;Melat B Maruta,&nbsp;Adera Debella","doi":"10.1155/2023/8465463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the enormous advantages of early pregnancy-related problem diagnosis and therapy during prenatal care visits, not all pregnant women begin antenatal care at the proper time. Thus, this study aims to identify factors associated with missed opportunities for antenatal care service utilization among reproductive-age women in Eastern Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study design (quantitative and qualitative) was conducted in Grawa, Meta, and Haramaya woredas from September 5 to December 5, 2019. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was used to identify the predictors. Statistical software programs based on ATLAS.ti version 8.2 was were used to conduct the thematic analysis of the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, missed opportunities for antenatal care were 15.4% of 95% (12.1, 19.1%). Factors such as maternal age being 15-24 (AOR = 6.9, 95% CI: 2.89-8.81); having a college education (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.42), elementary (AOR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.98), and secondary education (AOR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.88); having five and more parity (AOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.75); three visits (AOR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.71); those in the first trimester (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.35) and the second trimester (AOR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.26); and get information from a health facility (AOR =0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.67) and traditional birth attendance (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.74) were factors statistically associated with outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to this report, relatively high proportions of pregnant women experienced missed opportunities in antenatal care follow-up. Factors such as maternal age, education, parity, frequency, timing, and media access were statistically significantly correlated with missed antenatal care follow-up. Therefore, all stakeholders should emphasize advocating for and enhancing the benefits of antenatal care; this in turn plays a crucial role in increasing the follow-up of clients for these crucial services. Moreover, health policy implementers need to coordinate their tracking of pregnant women who missed their antenatal care session.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8465463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10555490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missed Opportunity of Antenatal Care Services Utilization and Associated Factors among Reproductive Age Women in Eastern Hararghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia: Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ibsa Mussa,&nbsp;On Makhubela-Nkondo,&nbsp;Melat B Maruta,&nbsp;Adera Debella\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8465463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the enormous advantages of early pregnancy-related problem diagnosis and therapy during prenatal care visits, not all pregnant women begin antenatal care at the proper time. Thus, this study aims to identify factors associated with missed opportunities for antenatal care service utilization among reproductive-age women in Eastern Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study design (quantitative and qualitative) was conducted in Grawa, Meta, and Haramaya woredas from September 5 to December 5, 2019. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was used to identify the predictors. Statistical software programs based on ATLAS.ti version 8.2 was were used to conduct the thematic analysis of the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, missed opportunities for antenatal care were 15.4% of 95% (12.1, 19.1%). Factors such as maternal age being 15-24 (AOR = 6.9, 95% CI: 2.89-8.81); having a college education (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.42), elementary (AOR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.98), and secondary education (AOR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.88); having five and more parity (AOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.75); three visits (AOR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.71); those in the first trimester (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.35) and the second trimester (AOR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.26); and get information from a health facility (AOR =0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.67) and traditional birth attendance (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.74) were factors statistically associated with outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to this report, relatively high proportions of pregnant women experienced missed opportunities in antenatal care follow-up. Factors such as maternal age, education, parity, frequency, timing, and media access were statistically significantly correlated with missed antenatal care follow-up. Therefore, all stakeholders should emphasize advocating for and enhancing the benefits of antenatal care; this in turn plays a crucial role in increasing the follow-up of clients for these crucial services. Moreover, health policy implementers need to coordinate their tracking of pregnant women who missed their antenatal care session.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"8465463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10555490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8465463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8465463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管早期妊娠相关问题的诊断和治疗在产前护理访问中具有巨大优势,但并非所有孕妇都在适当的时间开始产前护理。因此,本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚东部育龄妇女错过产前护理服务利用机会的相关因素。方法:2019年9月5日至12月5日,在Grawa、Meta和Haramaya woredas进行了混合方法研究设计(定量和定性)。使用SPSS 25版对定量数据进行分析。使用多变量逻辑回归分析模型来确定预测因素。使用基于ATLAS.ti 8.2版的统计软件程序对定性数据进行专题分析。结果:总的来说,错过产前护理的机会为15.4%(95%)(12.1,19.1%)。母亲年龄为15-24岁等因素(AOR=6.9,95%CI:2.89-8.81);受过大学教育(AOR=0.02,95%CI:0.001,0.42)、小学教育(AOR=0.05,95%CI:0.002,0.98)和中学教育(AOD=0.04,95%CI:0.0.001,0.88);具有五个或更多奇偶校验(AOR=0.08,95%置信区间:0.010.75);三次就诊(AOR=0.10,95%CI:0.02,0.71);妊娠早期(AOR=0.02,95%CI:0.001,0.35)和妊娠中期(AOR=0.01,95%CI:0.01,0.26);并从卫生机构(AOR)获取信息 =0.09,95%CI:0.01,0.67)和传统的分娩出勤率(AOR=0.02,95%CI:0.001,0.74)是与结果变量统计相关的因素。结论:根据这份报告,相对较高比例的孕妇在产前护理随访中错过了机会。产妇年龄、教育程度、产次、频率、时间安排和媒体访问等因素与错过产前护理随访在统计学上显著相关。因此,所有利益攸关方都应强调倡导和提高产前护理的好处;这反过来又在增加客户对这些关键服务的跟进方面发挥着至关重要的作用。此外,卫生政策执行者需要协调对错过产前护理的孕妇的跟踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Missed Opportunity of Antenatal Care Services Utilization and Associated Factors among Reproductive Age Women in Eastern Hararghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia: Mixed Methods Study.

Background: Despite the enormous advantages of early pregnancy-related problem diagnosis and therapy during prenatal care visits, not all pregnant women begin antenatal care at the proper time. Thus, this study aims to identify factors associated with missed opportunities for antenatal care service utilization among reproductive-age women in Eastern Ethiopia.

Methods: A mixed methods study design (quantitative and qualitative) was conducted in Grawa, Meta, and Haramaya woredas from September 5 to December 5, 2019. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was used to identify the predictors. Statistical software programs based on ATLAS.ti version 8.2 was were used to conduct the thematic analysis of the qualitative data.

Results: Overall, missed opportunities for antenatal care were 15.4% of 95% (12.1, 19.1%). Factors such as maternal age being 15-24 (AOR = 6.9, 95% CI: 2.89-8.81); having a college education (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.42), elementary (AOR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.98), and secondary education (AOR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.88); having five and more parity (AOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.75); three visits (AOR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.71); those in the first trimester (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.35) and the second trimester (AOR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.26); and get information from a health facility (AOR =0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.67) and traditional birth attendance (AOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.74) were factors statistically associated with outcome variables.

Conclusions: According to this report, relatively high proportions of pregnant women experienced missed opportunities in antenatal care follow-up. Factors such as maternal age, education, parity, frequency, timing, and media access were statistically significantly correlated with missed antenatal care follow-up. Therefore, all stakeholders should emphasize advocating for and enhancing the benefits of antenatal care; this in turn plays a crucial role in increasing the follow-up of clients for these crucial services. Moreover, health policy implementers need to coordinate their tracking of pregnant women who missed their antenatal care session.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies. Magnitude and Associated Factors of Herbal Medicine Use During Pregnancy Among Women Attending Antenatal Care in Public Health Institutions of Central Tigray, Northern Ethiopia (2020): Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Prevalence and Factors Associated With Abnormal Cerebroplacental Ratio Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwestern Uganda. Development, Validation, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fetal Lack of Responsiveness Scale for Diagnosis of Severe Perinatal Hypoxia. Navigating Pregnancy: Information Sources and Lifestyle Behavior Choices-A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1