脊髓损伤患者自杀意念的相关危险因素。

Cria-May Khong BS , John Chan MD , Elizabeth Pasipanodya PhD , Benjamin Dirlikov MA , Kazuko Shem MD
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者自杀意念的相关危险因素。","authors":"Cria-May Khong BS ,&nbsp;John Chan MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Pasipanodya PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Dirlikov MA ,&nbsp;Kazuko Shem MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the frequency of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and to identify risk factors associated with SI.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Community setting.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Two hundred and forty-six individuals with chronic SCI participating in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems at a Level 1 Trauma center.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure</h3><p>SI, as assessed by question 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-seven (11.0%) participants endorsed SI; 6 (22.2%) of whom endorsed active SI with a plan of self-harm. Participants who endorsed SI had significantly higher depressive symptoms, lower resilience, and lower satisfaction with life (all <em>P</em>s&lt;.001). They also had lower perceived health (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), Craig Handicap Assessment &amp; Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF) physical independence (<em>P</em>=.013), and Spinal Cord Injury – Functional Index with Assistive Technology domains of basic mobility (<em>P</em>=.003), self-care (<em>P</em>=.042), and fine motor skills (<em>P</em>=.035). However, participants who endorsed SI were not significantly different in re-hospitalization rates and in other domains of CHART-SF and SCI-AT. Logistic regression, with a forward selection procedure, was used to identify significant predictors of endorsing SI in the context of multiple associated variables. Depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR]=1.18, <em>P</em>=.020), resilience (OR=0.85, <em>P</em>=.003), and physical independence (OR=0.98, <em>P</em>=.019) remained significant predictors of SI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Study findings suggest higher levels of SI among people with SCI, a substantial proportion of whom have active SI. Individuals with SCI who endorse SI have greater burden of poor physical and mental health, as well as poorer functional status and adaptation. Interventions targeting multiple dimensions of quality of life may help reduce risk of SI and suicide among individuals with SCI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/f8/main.PMC10517356.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury\",\"authors\":\"Cria-May Khong BS ,&nbsp;John Chan MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Pasipanodya PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Dirlikov MA ,&nbsp;Kazuko Shem MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the frequency of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and to identify risk factors associated with SI.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Community setting.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Two hundred and forty-six individuals with chronic SCI participating in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems at a Level 1 Trauma center.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure</h3><p>SI, as assessed by question 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-seven (11.0%) participants endorsed SI; 6 (22.2%) of whom endorsed active SI with a plan of self-harm. Participants who endorsed SI had significantly higher depressive symptoms, lower resilience, and lower satisfaction with life (all <em>P</em>s&lt;.001). They also had lower perceived health (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), Craig Handicap Assessment &amp; Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF) physical independence (<em>P</em>=.013), and Spinal Cord Injury – Functional Index with Assistive Technology domains of basic mobility (<em>P</em>=.003), self-care (<em>P</em>=.042), and fine motor skills (<em>P</em>=.035). However, participants who endorsed SI were not significantly different in re-hospitalization rates and in other domains of CHART-SF and SCI-AT. Logistic regression, with a forward selection procedure, was used to identify significant predictors of endorsing SI in the context of multiple associated variables. Depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR]=1.18, <em>P</em>=.020), resilience (OR=0.85, <em>P</em>=.003), and physical independence (OR=0.98, <em>P</em>=.019) remained significant predictors of SI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Study findings suggest higher levels of SI among people with SCI, a substantial proportion of whom have active SI. Individuals with SCI who endorse SI have greater burden of poor physical and mental health, as well as poorer functional status and adaptation. Interventions targeting multiple dimensions of quality of life may help reduce risk of SI and suicide among individuals with SCI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/f8/main.PMC10517356.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952300040X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952300040X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评估慢性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者自杀意念(SI)的发生频率,并确定与SI相关的危险因素。参与者:246名慢性脊髓损伤患者参加了一级创伤中心的脊髓损伤模型系统。干预措施:不适用。主要结果指标:根据患者健康问卷-9的问题9评估的SI。结果:二十七名(11.0%)参与者支持SI;其中6人(22.2%)支持有自残计划的主动SI。支持SI的参与者有显著更高的抑郁症状、更低的恢复力和更低的生活满意度(所有PsPP=.013),以及脊髓损伤-辅助技术领域的基本活动能力(P=.003)、自我护理(P=.042)和精细运动技能(P=.035)。然而,支持SI的参与者在再住院率以及CHAR-SF和SCI-AT的其他领域没有显著差异。在多个相关变量的背景下,使用具有正向选择程序的Logistic回归来确定支持SI的显著预测因素。抑郁症状(比值比[OR]=1.18,P=0.020)、恢复力(OR=0.85,P=0.003)和身体独立性(OR=0.98,P=0.019)仍然是SI的重要预测因素,以及较差的功能状态和适应能力。针对生活质量多个维度的干预措施可能有助于降低SCI患者发生SI和自杀的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

Objective

To assess the frequency of suicidal ideation (SI) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and to identify risk factors associated with SI.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Community setting.

Participants

Two hundred and forty-six individuals with chronic SCI participating in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems at a Level 1 Trauma center.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

SI, as assessed by question 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

Results

Twenty-seven (11.0%) participants endorsed SI; 6 (22.2%) of whom endorsed active SI with a plan of self-harm. Participants who endorsed SI had significantly higher depressive symptoms, lower resilience, and lower satisfaction with life (all Ps<.001). They also had lower perceived health (P<.001), Craig Handicap Assessment & Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF) physical independence (P=.013), and Spinal Cord Injury – Functional Index with Assistive Technology domains of basic mobility (P=.003), self-care (P=.042), and fine motor skills (P=.035). However, participants who endorsed SI were not significantly different in re-hospitalization rates and in other domains of CHART-SF and SCI-AT. Logistic regression, with a forward selection procedure, was used to identify significant predictors of endorsing SI in the context of multiple associated variables. Depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR]=1.18, P=.020), resilience (OR=0.85, P=.003), and physical independence (OR=0.98, P=.019) remained significant predictors of SI.

Conclusion

Study findings suggest higher levels of SI among people with SCI, a substantial proportion of whom have active SI. Individuals with SCI who endorse SI have greater burden of poor physical and mental health, as well as poorer functional status and adaptation. Interventions targeting multiple dimensions of quality of life may help reduce risk of SI and suicide among individuals with SCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Psychometrics of Wearable Devices Measuring Physical Activity in Ambulant Children With Gait Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study The Impact of Executive Function on Retention and Compliance in Physical Therapy in Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1