Isabelle Nuiding, Christian Knorr, Dorien Schneidmüller, Miriam Adrian, Peter Schmittenbecher, Michael A Kertai
{"title":"Bado III型儿童孟氏症——治疗方案和结果:一项超声对照研究。","authors":"Isabelle Nuiding, Christian Knorr, Dorien Schneidmüller, Miriam Adrian, Peter Schmittenbecher, Michael A Kertai","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Bado III Monteggia lesion is an uncommon fracture in children. Radial head dislocation can occur due to intra- or extra-articular fractures of the olecranon. In extra-articular ulnar fractures, heterogeneous operative methods are proposed in different case reports. The objective of this study is to determine if closed reduction of the ulnar fracture, either without osteosynthesis or by using TEN, is a safe treatment option. In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed 26 children who were treated for an extra-articular proximal metaphyseal ulnar fracture with dislocation of the radial head. These patients underwent a follow-up examination after an average of four years. The investigation included a physical examination, visualization of the elbow anatomy, and specifically, the radial head retention in the joint by ultrasound. Of the 26 patients, 18 were treated by closed reduction and intramedullary osteosynthesis (TEN), 7 were treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization without osteosynthesis, and 1 child was treated by open reduction of the ulna and plate osteosynthesis. In the follow-up examination, 25 children showed an excellent outcome, as well as inapparent sonography. Although this is a retrospective study with different types of treatment, closed reduction of the ulna with or without osteosynthesis appears to be effective. We believe that the correct primary reduction is the key to an excellent long-term outcome. Regarding the invasiveness of the treatment, reduction without or with TEN osteosynthesis should be the preferred approach in extra-articular pediatric Bado III fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"477-483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bado III Monteggia in children - treatment options and outcome: an ultrasound control study.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Nuiding, Christian Knorr, Dorien Schneidmüller, Miriam Adrian, Peter Schmittenbecher, Michael A Kertai\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Bado III Monteggia lesion is an uncommon fracture in children. Radial head dislocation can occur due to intra- or extra-articular fractures of the olecranon. In extra-articular ulnar fractures, heterogeneous operative methods are proposed in different case reports. The objective of this study is to determine if closed reduction of the ulnar fracture, either without osteosynthesis or by using TEN, is a safe treatment option. In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed 26 children who were treated for an extra-articular proximal metaphyseal ulnar fracture with dislocation of the radial head. These patients underwent a follow-up examination after an average of four years. The investigation included a physical examination, visualization of the elbow anatomy, and specifically, the radial head retention in the joint by ultrasound. Of the 26 patients, 18 were treated by closed reduction and intramedullary osteosynthesis (TEN), 7 were treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization without osteosynthesis, and 1 child was treated by open reduction of the ulna and plate osteosynthesis. In the follow-up examination, 25 children showed an excellent outcome, as well as inapparent sonography. Although this is a retrospective study with different types of treatment, closed reduction of the ulna with or without osteosynthesis appears to be effective. We believe that the correct primary reduction is the key to an excellent long-term outcome. Regarding the invasiveness of the treatment, reduction without or with TEN osteosynthesis should be the preferred approach in extra-articular pediatric Bado III fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"477-483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Bado III Monteggia病变是一种罕见的儿童骨折。桡骨小头脱位可由鹰嘴关节内或关节外骨折引起。对于尺骨关节外骨折,不同病例报告中提出了不同的手术方法。本研究的目的是确定尺骨骨折的闭合复位,无论是不进行接骨还是使用TEN,是否是一种安全的治疗选择。在一项多中心研究中,我们回顾性分析了26名接受关节外尺骨近端干骺端骨折伴桡骨头脱位治疗的儿童。这些患者在平均四年后接受了随访检查。研究包括身体检查、肘部解剖结构的可视化,特别是通过超声波检查桡骨头在关节中的保留情况。在26名患者中,18名患者接受了闭合复位和髓内接骨(TEN)治疗,7名患者在不进行接骨的情况下接受了闭合减压和石膏固定治疗,1名儿童接受了尺骨开放复位和钢板接骨治疗。在后续检查中,25名儿童显示出良好的结果,以及不明显的超声检查。尽管这是一项不同类型治疗的回顾性研究,但闭合性尺骨复位加或不加接骨似乎是有效的。我们认为,正确的初级减排是取得良好长期成果的关键。关于治疗的侵袭性,在儿童Bado III关节外骨折中,不进行或结合TEN接骨的复位应是首选方法。
Bado III Monteggia in children - treatment options and outcome: an ultrasound control study.
The Bado III Monteggia lesion is an uncommon fracture in children. Radial head dislocation can occur due to intra- or extra-articular fractures of the olecranon. In extra-articular ulnar fractures, heterogeneous operative methods are proposed in different case reports. The objective of this study is to determine if closed reduction of the ulnar fracture, either without osteosynthesis or by using TEN, is a safe treatment option. In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed 26 children who were treated for an extra-articular proximal metaphyseal ulnar fracture with dislocation of the radial head. These patients underwent a follow-up examination after an average of four years. The investigation included a physical examination, visualization of the elbow anatomy, and specifically, the radial head retention in the joint by ultrasound. Of the 26 patients, 18 were treated by closed reduction and intramedullary osteosynthesis (TEN), 7 were treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization without osteosynthesis, and 1 child was treated by open reduction of the ulna and plate osteosynthesis. In the follow-up examination, 25 children showed an excellent outcome, as well as inapparent sonography. Although this is a retrospective study with different types of treatment, closed reduction of the ulna with or without osteosynthesis appears to be effective. We believe that the correct primary reduction is the key to an excellent long-term outcome. Regarding the invasiveness of the treatment, reduction without or with TEN osteosynthesis should be the preferred approach in extra-articular pediatric Bado III fractures.
期刊介绍:
The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies).
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.