第三方复制-Instagram上的趋势是什么?

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20230033
Katherine Wede, Alexandra Peyser, Christine Mullin
{"title":"第三方复制-Instagram上的趋势是什么?","authors":"Katherine Wede, Alexandra Peyser, Christine Mullin","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20230033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, authorship and content type of third-party reproduction-related information shared on Instagram by hashtag analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of 10 hashtags consisting of terms related to third-party reproduction was derived. Content analysis was performed in December 2021 on the most recent 100 posts for each hashtag to determine authorship and content type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 838,151 posts. The 3 most popular hashtags were 'surrogacy', 'surrogate' and 'surrogacy journey.' Authorship of the top posts were: patients (59.2%), professional society (14.2%), for-profit commercial groups (11.4%), allied health professional (9.4%), physicians (3.3%), and other (2.5%). Patient experiences accounted for the largest share of posts (39.4%), followed by personal posts unrelated to diagnosis (21.5%), outreach posts (19.5%), advertisements (14.2%) and educational (4.8%). Patients authored the majority of posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vast majority of Instagram posts related to third-party reproduction were authored by patients who shared their own personal experiences. Within surrogacy, both gestational carriers and intended parents shared their experiences providing perspective into the surrogacy process. Physician participation may improve the quality and quantity of educational posts and offer a low-cost platform for networking and connecting with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-Party Reproduction - What's Trending on Instagram?\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Wede, Alexandra Peyser, Christine Mullin\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20230033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, authorship and content type of third-party reproduction-related information shared on Instagram by hashtag analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of 10 hashtags consisting of terms related to third-party reproduction was derived. Content analysis was performed in December 2021 on the most recent 100 posts for each hashtag to determine authorship and content type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 838,151 posts. The 3 most popular hashtags were 'surrogacy', 'surrogate' and 'surrogacy journey.' Authorship of the top posts were: patients (59.2%), professional society (14.2%), for-profit commercial groups (11.4%), allied health professional (9.4%), physicians (3.3%), and other (2.5%). Patient experiences accounted for the largest share of posts (39.4%), followed by personal posts unrelated to diagnosis (21.5%), outreach posts (19.5%), advertisements (14.2%) and educational (4.8%). Patients authored the majority of posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vast majority of Instagram posts related to third-party reproduction were authored by patients who shared their own personal experiences. Within surrogacy, both gestational carriers and intended parents shared their experiences providing perspective into the surrogacy process. Physician participation may improve the quality and quantity of educational posts and offer a low-cost platform for networking and connecting with patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过标签分析来确定Instagram上共享的第三方复制相关信息的流行率、作者和内容类型。方法:导出10个标签列表,其中包括与第三方复制相关的术语。2021年12月,对每个标签的最新100篇帖子进行了内容分析,以确定作者和内容类型。结果:我们的搜索结果为838151个帖子。最受欢迎的三个标签是“代孕”、“代孕者”和“代孕之旅”最高职位的作者是:患者(59.2%)、专业协会(14.2%)、营利性商业团体(11.4%)、专职卫生专业人员(9.4%)、医生(3.3%)和其他(2.5%)。患者经历占职位的最大份额(39.4%),其次是与诊断无关的个人职位(21.5%)、外展职位(19.5%),广告(14.2%)和教育(4.8%)。患者撰写了大多数帖子。结论:绝大多数与第三方复制相关的Instagram帖子都是由分享自己个人经历的患者撰写的。在代孕过程中,妊娠携带者和准父母都分享了他们的经历,为代孕过程提供了视角。医生的参与可以提高教育帖子的质量和数量,并为与患者建立联系提供一个低成本的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Third-Party Reproduction - What's Trending on Instagram?

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, authorship and content type of third-party reproduction-related information shared on Instagram by hashtag analysis.

Methods: A list of 10 hashtags consisting of terms related to third-party reproduction was derived. Content analysis was performed in December 2021 on the most recent 100 posts for each hashtag to determine authorship and content type.

Results: Our search yielded 838,151 posts. The 3 most popular hashtags were 'surrogacy', 'surrogate' and 'surrogacy journey.' Authorship of the top posts were: patients (59.2%), professional society (14.2%), for-profit commercial groups (11.4%), allied health professional (9.4%), physicians (3.3%), and other (2.5%). Patient experiences accounted for the largest share of posts (39.4%), followed by personal posts unrelated to diagnosis (21.5%), outreach posts (19.5%), advertisements (14.2%) and educational (4.8%). Patients authored the majority of posts.

Conclusions: The vast majority of Instagram posts related to third-party reproduction were authored by patients who shared their own personal experiences. Within surrogacy, both gestational carriers and intended parents shared their experiences providing perspective into the surrogacy process. Physician participation may improve the quality and quantity of educational posts and offer a low-cost platform for networking and connecting with patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Deleterious Effects of Caffeine Consumption on Reproductive Functions of Female Wistar Rats. Effect of β-caryophyllene on Sperm Cryopreservation. Poster Presentation - REDLARA Congress Andean Region 2024 - Santiago - Chile. The effect of single dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist injection in frozen-thawed embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of astaxanthin supplementation during vitrification and liquid nitrogen vapor freezing on motility, morphology, survival, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and DNA fragmentation of post-cryopreserved human sperm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1