加拿大物理治疗师和物理治疗师学生在临床实践中执行功能评估知识和使用情况的调查。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Canada Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.3138/ptc-2021-0020
Nicole A Guitar, Denise M Connelly, Laura L Murray, Susan W Hunter
{"title":"加拿大物理治疗师和物理治疗师学生在临床实践中执行功能评估知识和使用情况的调查。","authors":"Nicole A Guitar, Denise M Connelly, Laura L Murray, Susan W Hunter","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined what physiotherapists and physiotherapy students understand and know about executive functioning (EF), what EF outcome measures they use clinically, and whether their primary area of practice influences their assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An open online survey was distributed to registered members of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, its various divisions, and colleges of physiotherapy within Canada that took approximately 15 minutes to complete and was available for 13 months. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between subjective and objective understanding and knowledge of EF (UKEF) and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze differences in survey responses based on respondents' primary area of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 335 respondents consented to participate (completion rate = 78.4%). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between subjective and objective UKEF (<i>r</i> = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.54; <i>n</i> = 260; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant differences in survey responses were related to physiotherapists' primary areas of practice (i.e., musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiorespiratory, or multi-systems; <i>F</i><sub>12,555.89</sub> = 2.29, <i>p</i> = 0.008; Wilks Λ = 0.880; partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents reported that they had good subjective UKEF, but this was only moderately correlated with objective UKEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Canadian Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Students' Knowledge and Use of Executive Functioning Assessments in Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole A Guitar, Denise M Connelly, Laura L Murray, Susan W Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ptc-2021-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined what physiotherapists and physiotherapy students understand and know about executive functioning (EF), what EF outcome measures they use clinically, and whether their primary area of practice influences their assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An open online survey was distributed to registered members of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, its various divisions, and colleges of physiotherapy within Canada that took approximately 15 minutes to complete and was available for 13 months. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between subjective and objective understanding and knowledge of EF (UKEF) and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze differences in survey responses based on respondents' primary area of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 335 respondents consented to participate (completion rate = 78.4%). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between subjective and objective UKEF (<i>r</i> = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.54; <i>n</i> = 260; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant differences in survey responses were related to physiotherapists' primary areas of practice (i.e., musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiorespiratory, or multi-systems; <i>F</i><sub>12,555.89</sub> = 2.29, <i>p</i> = 0.008; Wilks Λ = 0.880; partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents reported that they had good subjective UKEF, but this was only moderately correlated with objective UKEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Canada\",\"volume\":\"75 2\",\"pages\":\"177-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2021-0020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2021-0020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了理疗师和理疗师学生对执行功能(EF)的理解和了解,他们在临床上使用的EF结果指标,以及他们的主要实践领域是否影响他们的评估实践。方法:向加拿大理疗协会、其各部门和加拿大理疗学院的注册成员分发一份公开的在线调查,该调查耗时约15分钟,有效期为13个月。Pearson相关性用于评估主观和客观对EF(UKEF)的理解和知识之间的关系,并使用单向多变量方差分析来分析基于受访者主要实践领域的调查结果差异。结果:共有335名受访者同意参与(完成率=78.4%)。主观和客观UKEF之间存在显著的中度正相关(r=0.43;95%置信区间:0.32,0.54;n=260;p F12555.89=2.29,p=0.008;Wilks∧=0.880;部分η2=0.042)。结论:受访者报告他们具有良好的主观UKEF,但这仅与客观UKEF适度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey of Canadian Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Students' Knowledge and Use of Executive Functioning Assessments in Clinical Practice.

Purpose: This study examined what physiotherapists and physiotherapy students understand and know about executive functioning (EF), what EF outcome measures they use clinically, and whether their primary area of practice influences their assessment practices.

Method: An open online survey was distributed to registered members of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, its various divisions, and colleges of physiotherapy within Canada that took approximately 15 minutes to complete and was available for 13 months. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between subjective and objective understanding and knowledge of EF (UKEF) and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze differences in survey responses based on respondents' primary area of practice.

Results: A total of 335 respondents consented to participate (completion rate = 78.4%). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between subjective and objective UKEF (r = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.54; n = 260; p < 0.001). Significant differences in survey responses were related to physiotherapists' primary areas of practice (i.e., musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiorespiratory, or multi-systems; F12,555.89 = 2.29, p = 0.008; Wilks Λ = 0.880; partial η2 = 0.042).

Conclusions: Respondents reported that they had good subjective UKEF, but this was only moderately correlated with objective UKEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Canada
Physiotherapy Canada REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA), giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care. Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports. Key messages, clinical commentaries, brief reports and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice. In addition to delivering authoritative, original scientific articles and reports of significant clinical studies, Physiotherapy Canada’s editorials and abstracts are presented in both English and French, expanding the journal’s reach nationally and internationally. Key messages form an integral part of each research article, providing a succinct summary for readers of all levels. This approach also allows readers to quickly get a feel for ‘what is already known’ and ‘what this study adds to’ the subject. Clinician’s commentaries for key articles assist in bridging research and practice by discussing the article’s impact at the clinical level. The journal also features special themed series which bring readers up to date research supporting evidence-informed practice. The Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA) is the national professional association representing almost 15,000 members distributed throughout all provinces and territories. CPA’s mission is to provide leadership and direction to the physiotherapy profession, foster excellence in practice, education and research, and promote high standards of health in Canada.
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapists' Adoption and Perceptions of Tele-Rehabilitation for Cardiorespiratory Care in Response to COVID-19. Commentary on Marzolini et al.1. Commentary on Ravi et al.1. Commentary on Schertzer et al.1. Commentary on Spadoni et al.1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1