通过专业人员的视角和治疗法学的视角探索失踪人员调查的家庭经历。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Psychiatry Psychology and Law Pub Date : 2022-07-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13218719.2022.2085208
Stephanie Dartnall, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Judith Gullifer
{"title":"通过专业人员的视角和治疗法学的视角探索失踪人员调查的家庭经历。","authors":"Stephanie Dartnall,&nbsp;Jane Goodman-Delahunty,&nbsp;Judith Gullifer","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2022.2085208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In some Australian and international jurisdictions, coroners can deliver a legal determination of death whilst a person remains missing. Empirical attention to this unique area of law is sparse. Semi-structured interviews with 22 coronial professionals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia revealed their views about suspected death inquests, the impact of this judicial process on family well-being and measures to support and inform relatives in the coroner's court. Thematic analysis yielded five themes: (1) Information to the greatest extent possible; (2) Timeliness; (3) Opportunity to share their views; (4) In the public arena; and (5) Treat people like human beings. The professionals believed that relatives derive therapeutic benefit from timely, sensitive, comprehensible proceedings with opportunities for ritual, meaningful participation and fresh evidence whereas insensitive, incomprehensible and/or untimely proceedings magnify distress. Our findings promote understanding of trauma-informed practices which could mitigate harm to court participants and benefit other courts and jurisdictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51553,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","volume":"30 5","pages":"655-678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512802/pdf/TPPL_30_2085208.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring family experiences of missing persons inquests through the eyes of professionals and the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Dartnall,&nbsp;Jane Goodman-Delahunty,&nbsp;Judith Gullifer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13218719.2022.2085208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In some Australian and international jurisdictions, coroners can deliver a legal determination of death whilst a person remains missing. Empirical attention to this unique area of law is sparse. Semi-structured interviews with 22 coronial professionals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia revealed their views about suspected death inquests, the impact of this judicial process on family well-being and measures to support and inform relatives in the coroner's court. Thematic analysis yielded five themes: (1) Information to the greatest extent possible; (2) Timeliness; (3) Opportunity to share their views; (4) In the public arena; and (5) Treat people like human beings. The professionals believed that relatives derive therapeutic benefit from timely, sensitive, comprehensible proceedings with opportunities for ritual, meaningful participation and fresh evidence whereas insensitive, incomprehensible and/or untimely proceedings magnify distress. Our findings promote understanding of trauma-informed practices which could mitigate harm to court participants and benefit other courts and jurisdictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"655-678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512802/pdf/TPPL_30_2085208.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2022.2085208\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2022.2085208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在一些澳大利亚和国际司法管辖区,当一个人仍然失踪时,验尸官可以提供死亡的法律裁定。对这一独特法律领域的经验关注很少。对澳大利亚新南威尔士州22名验尸专业人员进行的半结构化采访揭示了他们对疑似死亡调查的看法、这一司法程序对家庭幸福的影响以及在验尸法庭上支持和告知亲属的措施。专题分析产生了五个主题:(1)尽可能提供信息;(2) 及时性;(3) 有机会分享他们的观点;(4) 在公共场所;和(5)像对待人一样对待人。专业人士认为,亲属从及时、敏感、可理解的诉讼中获得治疗益处,有机会进行仪式、有意义的参与和新的证据,而不敏感、不可理解和/或不合时宜的诉讼则会加剧痛苦。我们的研究结果促进了对创伤知情实践的理解,这些实践可以减轻对法院参与者的伤害,并使其他法院和司法管辖区受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring family experiences of missing persons inquests through the eyes of professionals and the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence.

In some Australian and international jurisdictions, coroners can deliver a legal determination of death whilst a person remains missing. Empirical attention to this unique area of law is sparse. Semi-structured interviews with 22 coronial professionals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia revealed their views about suspected death inquests, the impact of this judicial process on family well-being and measures to support and inform relatives in the coroner's court. Thematic analysis yielded five themes: (1) Information to the greatest extent possible; (2) Timeliness; (3) Opportunity to share their views; (4) In the public arena; and (5) Treat people like human beings. The professionals believed that relatives derive therapeutic benefit from timely, sensitive, comprehensible proceedings with opportunities for ritual, meaningful participation and fresh evidence whereas insensitive, incomprehensible and/or untimely proceedings magnify distress. Our findings promote understanding of trauma-informed practices which could mitigate harm to court participants and benefit other courts and jurisdictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law is rapidly becoming a driving force behind the up-to-date examination of forensic issues in psychiatry and psychology. It is a fully refereed journal with outstanding academic and professional representation on its editorial board and is aimed at health, mental health and legal professionals. The journal aims to publish and disseminate information regarding research and development in forensic psychiatry, forensic psychology and areas of law and other disciplines in which psychiatry and psychology have a relevance. Features of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law include review articles; analyses of professional issues, controversies and developments; case studies; original empirical studies; book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The power of words: the impact of police interviewer’s judgment error and apology on sexual violence victims in simulated interviews What are the chances? – Validity assessment and the cumulative binomial distribution in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions Is the continuum of coercion in psychiatry really a continuum? A statistical implication analysis Perceived coercion in psychiatric inpatients: a validation study of the Romanian-language version of the Admission Experience Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1