远程医疗跨学科护理团队对腰痛患者的评估和治疗:一项回顾性观察研究。

David N. Woznica MD, MS, Mark Milligan PT, DPT, OCS, Holly Krymis LCSW, NBC-HWC, Kaitlyn C. Peters MSN, RN, NP-C, Mary I. O'Connor MD, Ryan A. Grant MD, MBA
{"title":"远程医疗跨学科护理团队对腰痛患者的评估和治疗:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"David N. Woznica MD, MS,&nbsp;Mark Milligan PT, DPT, OCS,&nbsp;Holly Krymis LCSW, NBC-HWC,&nbsp;Kaitlyn C. Peters MSN, RN, NP-C,&nbsp;Mary I. O'Connor MD,&nbsp;Ryan A. Grant MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effects of an interdisciplinary care team (ICT) model delivered by telemedicine on patients with low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective analysis of deidentified pre-existing data.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Retrospective observational study of patients presenting with LBP to a nationwide telemedicine practice using an ICT model.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Over a 9-month period all patients with a diagnosis related to LBP and who had an ICT evaluation (medical doctor, advanced practice provider, health coach, and physical therapist) were included in the study (n=36). A minimum of 2 follow-up physical therapy visits were required for inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were evaluated for LBP, received a diagnosis, and were offered a multidisciplinary treatment plan. Additional real-time audio visual medical, health coaching, registered dietician, and physical therapy services were received as deemed clinically appropriate.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Baseline, 30 day, and final pain (mean 81 day) measurements via numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Baseline and final Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 Global Mental/Physical domains.</p></div><div><h3>Secondary Outcome Measures</h3><p>Use of prescription medication, referral for imaging, need for injections, or surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>36 patients met criteria. Pain levels included mild (n=6, 16.7%), moderate (n=19, 52.8%), and severe (n=11, 30.6%). Clinically significant pain improvements were noted in 83.3% (n=25) of those with moderate or severe pain. PROMIS Mental and Physical Health categorization from Fair/Poor to Good/Excellent significantly improved over time. The initial 20% (n=7) in Fair/Poor Mental Health improved to 6.3% (n=2) at finish, while the 80% (n=28) in Good/Excellent Mental Health at start improved to 93.8% (n=30) at finish. Regarding Physical Health, 51.4% (n=18) rated Fair/Poor at start and 31.3% (n=10) at finish, while the 48.6% (n=17) rated Good/Excellent at start improved to 68.8% (n=22) at finish. The need for prescription medication was low (n=6, 16.7%) and spinal imaging orders were negligible (n=1, 2.8%). Injections were warranted in 11.4% (n=4) of patients and surgical referral with operative treatment in 2.8% (n=1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Interdisciplinary care delivered through telemedicine can significantly improve pain and support improved health-related quality of life in patients with LBP, with low rates of imaging, prescription, and interventional use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/6f/main.PMC10517362.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedical Interdisciplinary Care Team Evaluation and Treatment of People With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"David N. Woznica MD, MS,&nbsp;Mark Milligan PT, DPT, OCS,&nbsp;Holly Krymis LCSW, NBC-HWC,&nbsp;Kaitlyn C. Peters MSN, RN, NP-C,&nbsp;Mary I. O'Connor MD,&nbsp;Ryan A. Grant MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effects of an interdisciplinary care team (ICT) model delivered by telemedicine on patients with low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective analysis of deidentified pre-existing data.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Retrospective observational study of patients presenting with LBP to a nationwide telemedicine practice using an ICT model.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Over a 9-month period all patients with a diagnosis related to LBP and who had an ICT evaluation (medical doctor, advanced practice provider, health coach, and physical therapist) were included in the study (n=36). A minimum of 2 follow-up physical therapy visits were required for inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were evaluated for LBP, received a diagnosis, and were offered a multidisciplinary treatment plan. Additional real-time audio visual medical, health coaching, registered dietician, and physical therapy services were received as deemed clinically appropriate.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Baseline, 30 day, and final pain (mean 81 day) measurements via numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Baseline and final Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 Global Mental/Physical domains.</p></div><div><h3>Secondary Outcome Measures</h3><p>Use of prescription medication, referral for imaging, need for injections, or surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>36 patients met criteria. Pain levels included mild (n=6, 16.7%), moderate (n=19, 52.8%), and severe (n=11, 30.6%). Clinically significant pain improvements were noted in 83.3% (n=25) of those with moderate or severe pain. PROMIS Mental and Physical Health categorization from Fair/Poor to Good/Excellent significantly improved over time. The initial 20% (n=7) in Fair/Poor Mental Health improved to 6.3% (n=2) at finish, while the 80% (n=28) in Good/Excellent Mental Health at start improved to 93.8% (n=30) at finish. Regarding Physical Health, 51.4% (n=18) rated Fair/Poor at start and 31.3% (n=10) at finish, while the 48.6% (n=17) rated Good/Excellent at start improved to 68.8% (n=22) at finish. The need for prescription medication was low (n=6, 16.7%) and spinal imaging orders were negligible (n=1, 2.8%). Injections were warranted in 11.4% (n=4) of patients and surgical referral with operative treatment in 2.8% (n=1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Interdisciplinary care delivered through telemedicine can significantly improve pain and support improved health-related quality of life in patients with LBP, with low rates of imaging, prescription, and interventional use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/6f/main.PMC10517362.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估远程医疗提供的跨学科护理团队(ICT)模式对腰痛(LBP)患者的影响。设计:对已识别的先前数据进行回顾性分析。背景:使用ICT模型对全国远程医疗实践中出现LBP的患者进行回顾性观察性研究。参与者:在9个月的时间里,所有诊断为LBP并接受ICT评估的患者(医生、高级实践提供者、健康教练和理疗师)都被纳入了研究(n=36)。至少需要2次物理治疗随访才能纳入。干预措施:对患者进行LBP评估,接受诊断,并提供多学科治疗计划。额外的实时视听医疗、健康指导、注册营养师和物理治疗服务在临床上被认为是合适的。主要结果测量:通过数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)测量基线、30天和最终疼痛(平均81天)。基线和最终患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)-10个全球心理/生理领域。次要结果指标:处方药的使用、影像学转诊、是否需要注射或手术。结果:36例符合标准。疼痛水平包括轻度(n=6,16.7%)、中度(n=19,52.8%)和重度(n=11,30.6%)。83.3%(n=25)的中度或重度疼痛患者的疼痛有显著改善。随着时间的推移,PROMIS的心理和身体健康分类从一般/差到良好/优秀显著改善。心理健康状况良好/较差的最初20%(n=7)在比赛结束时提高到6.3%(n=2),而良好/优秀心理健康的80%(n=28)在比赛开始时提高到93.8%(n=30)。在身体健康方面,51.4%(n=18)的人在开始时被评为一般/差,31.3%(n=10)的人被评为结束时,48.6%(n=17)的人从开始时的良好/优秀提高到结束时的68.8%(n=22)。对处方药的需求较低(n=6,16.7%),脊柱成像顺序可忽略不计(n=1,2.8%)。11.4%(n=4)的患者需要注射,2.8%(n=1)的患者需手术转诊。结论:通过远程医疗提供的跨学科护理可以显著改善LBP患者的疼痛,并支持改善与健康相关的生活质量,成像、处方和介入使用率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemedical Interdisciplinary Care Team Evaluation and Treatment of People With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study

Objective

To evaluate the effects of an interdisciplinary care team (ICT) model delivered by telemedicine on patients with low back pain (LBP).

Design

Retrospective analysis of deidentified pre-existing data.

Setting

Retrospective observational study of patients presenting with LBP to a nationwide telemedicine practice using an ICT model.

Participants

Over a 9-month period all patients with a diagnosis related to LBP and who had an ICT evaluation (medical doctor, advanced practice provider, health coach, and physical therapist) were included in the study (n=36). A minimum of 2 follow-up physical therapy visits were required for inclusion.

Interventions

Patients were evaluated for LBP, received a diagnosis, and were offered a multidisciplinary treatment plan. Additional real-time audio visual medical, health coaching, registered dietician, and physical therapy services were received as deemed clinically appropriate.

Main Outcome Measures

Baseline, 30 day, and final pain (mean 81 day) measurements via numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Baseline and final Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 Global Mental/Physical domains.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Use of prescription medication, referral for imaging, need for injections, or surgery.

Results

36 patients met criteria. Pain levels included mild (n=6, 16.7%), moderate (n=19, 52.8%), and severe (n=11, 30.6%). Clinically significant pain improvements were noted in 83.3% (n=25) of those with moderate or severe pain. PROMIS Mental and Physical Health categorization from Fair/Poor to Good/Excellent significantly improved over time. The initial 20% (n=7) in Fair/Poor Mental Health improved to 6.3% (n=2) at finish, while the 80% (n=28) in Good/Excellent Mental Health at start improved to 93.8% (n=30) at finish. Regarding Physical Health, 51.4% (n=18) rated Fair/Poor at start and 31.3% (n=10) at finish, while the 48.6% (n=17) rated Good/Excellent at start improved to 68.8% (n=22) at finish. The need for prescription medication was low (n=6, 16.7%) and spinal imaging orders were negligible (n=1, 2.8%). Injections were warranted in 11.4% (n=4) of patients and surgical referral with operative treatment in 2.8% (n=1).

Conclusion

Interdisciplinary care delivered through telemedicine can significantly improve pain and support improved health-related quality of life in patients with LBP, with low rates of imaging, prescription, and interventional use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Psychometrics of Wearable Devices Measuring Physical Activity in Ambulant Children With Gait Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study The Impact of Executive Function on Retention and Compliance in Physical Therapy in Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1