护士对重症监护室临终关怀障碍和支持行为的看法。

Majd T. Mrayyan , Nijmeh Al-Atiyyat , Ala Ashour , Ali Alshraifeen , Abdullah Algunmeeyn , Sami Al-Rawashdeh , Murad Sawalha , Abdallah Abu Khait , Imad Alfayoumi , Mohammad Sayaheen , Mohammad Odeh
{"title":"护士对重症监护室临终关怀障碍和支持行为的看法。","authors":"Majd T. Mrayyan ,&nbsp;Nijmeh Al-Atiyyat ,&nbsp;Ala Ashour ,&nbsp;Ali Alshraifeen ,&nbsp;Abdullah Algunmeeyn ,&nbsp;Sami Al-Rawashdeh ,&nbsp;Murad Sawalha ,&nbsp;Abdallah Abu Khait ,&nbsp;Imad Alfayoumi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sayaheen ,&nbsp;Mohammad Odeh","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study examined the Jordanian registered nurses’ perceptions of the obstacles and supportive behaviors of End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units and examined the differences in the concepts based on the samples’ demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted using a convenience sample of 230 Intensive Care Unit registered nurses in Jordan. Data were analyzed descriptively, and differences were measured using the independent sample </span><em>t</em><span>-test, the one-way Analysis of Variance, and Scheffe’s post hoc test.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The registered nurses’ scored moderately on obstacles (74.98 ± 14.54) and supportive behaviors (69.22 ± 4.84). The commonly perceived obstacle and supportive behaviors to End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units s were reported. The perceived obstacles differ based on the registered nurses’ certification as an Intensive Care Units nurse (3.04 ± 0.58 vs. 2.74 ± 0.49, p = 0.008), type of Intensive Care Unit (3.28 ± 0.34 vs. 2.86 ± 0.62, p &lt; 0.001), type of facility (3.16 ± 0.59 vs. 2.77 ± 0.61, p &lt; 0.001), number of beds in the unit (3.07 ± 0.48 vs. 2.69 ± 0.48, p = 0.020), and the number of hours worked per week (3.06 ± 0.56 vs. 2.81 ± 0.60, p = 0.005). In contrast, supportive behaviors only differ based on the registered nurses’ age (3.22 ± 0.69 vs. 2.90 ± 0.64, p = 0.019).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The common End-of-Life Care perceived obstacle in Intensive Care Units was the lack of nursing education and training regarding the studies concept, which warrants immediate intervention such as on-job training. The common End-of-Life Care perceived supportive behavior in Intensive Care Units was when family members accepted that the patient was dying when nurses offered support to family members; motivational interventions are needed to sustain such behavior. Differences in the perceived obstacles and supportive behaviors should be leveraged for the benefit of patients, nurses, and hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"35 1","pages":"Pages 23-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses’ perceptions of the obstacles and supportive behaviors of end-of-life care in intensive care units\",\"authors\":\"Majd T. Mrayyan ,&nbsp;Nijmeh Al-Atiyyat ,&nbsp;Ala Ashour ,&nbsp;Ali Alshraifeen ,&nbsp;Abdullah Algunmeeyn ,&nbsp;Sami Al-Rawashdeh ,&nbsp;Murad Sawalha ,&nbsp;Abdallah Abu Khait ,&nbsp;Imad Alfayoumi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sayaheen ,&nbsp;Mohammad Odeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study examined the Jordanian registered nurses’ perceptions of the obstacles and supportive behaviors of End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units and examined the differences in the concepts based on the samples’ demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted using a convenience sample of 230 Intensive Care Unit registered nurses in Jordan. Data were analyzed descriptively, and differences were measured using the independent sample </span><em>t</em><span>-test, the one-way Analysis of Variance, and Scheffe’s post hoc test.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The registered nurses’ scored moderately on obstacles (74.98 ± 14.54) and supportive behaviors (69.22 ± 4.84). The commonly perceived obstacle and supportive behaviors to End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units s were reported. The perceived obstacles differ based on the registered nurses’ certification as an Intensive Care Units nurse (3.04 ± 0.58 vs. 2.74 ± 0.49, p = 0.008), type of Intensive Care Unit (3.28 ± 0.34 vs. 2.86 ± 0.62, p &lt; 0.001), type of facility (3.16 ± 0.59 vs. 2.77 ± 0.61, p &lt; 0.001), number of beds in the unit (3.07 ± 0.48 vs. 2.69 ± 0.48, p = 0.020), and the number of hours worked per week (3.06 ± 0.56 vs. 2.81 ± 0.60, p = 0.005). In contrast, supportive behaviors only differ based on the registered nurses’ age (3.22 ± 0.69 vs. 2.90 ± 0.64, p = 0.019).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The common End-of-Life Care perceived obstacle in Intensive Care Units was the lack of nursing education and training regarding the studies concept, which warrants immediate intervention such as on-job training. The common End-of-Life Care perceived supportive behavior in Intensive Care Units was when family members accepted that the patient was dying when nurses offered support to family members; motivational interventions are needed to sustain such behavior. Differences in the perceived obstacles and supportive behaviors should be leveraged for the benefit of patients, nurses, and hospitals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria intensiva\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984023000435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984023000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了约旦注册护士对重症监护室临终关怀的障碍和支持行为的看法,并根据样本的人口统计调查了这些概念的差异。方法:对约旦230名重症监护室注册护士进行了横断面和比较研究。对数据进行描述性分析,并使用独立样本t检验、单向方差分析和Scheffe事后检验来测量差异。结果:注册护士在障碍(74.98±14.54)和支持行为(69.22±4.84)方面得分中等,报告了重症监护病房常见的临终关怀障碍和支持行为。根据注册护士作为重症监护室护士的认证(3.04±0.58 vs.2.74±0.49,p=0.008)、重症监护室类型(3.28±0.34 vs.2.86±0.62,p<0.001)、设施类型(3.16±0.59 vs.2.77±0.61,p<001)、病房床位数量(3.07±0.48 vs.2.69±0.48,p=0.020),以及每周工作小时数(3.06±0.56 vs.2.81±0.60,p=0.005)。相比之下,支持行为仅因注册护士的年龄而异(3.22±0.69 vs.2.90±0.64,p=0.019)。结论:重症监护室常见的临终关怀障碍是缺乏关于研究概念的护理教育和培训,这就需要立即进行干预,例如在职培训。在重症监护室,常见的临终关怀感知支持行为是当护士向家人提供支持时,家人接受患者即将死亡;需要动机干预来维持这种行为。为了患者、护士和医院的利益,应该利用感知障碍和支持行为的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses’ perceptions of the obstacles and supportive behaviors of end-of-life care in intensive care units

Purpose

This study examined the Jordanian registered nurses’ perceptions of the obstacles and supportive behaviors of End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units and examined the differences in the concepts based on the samples’ demographics.

Methods

A cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted using a convenience sample of 230 Intensive Care Unit registered nurses in Jordan. Data were analyzed descriptively, and differences were measured using the independent sample t-test, the one-way Analysis of Variance, and Scheffe’s post hoc test.

Results

The registered nurses’ scored moderately on obstacles (74.98 ± 14.54) and supportive behaviors (69.22 ± 4.84). The commonly perceived obstacle and supportive behaviors to End-of-Life Care in Intensive Care Units s were reported. The perceived obstacles differ based on the registered nurses’ certification as an Intensive Care Units nurse (3.04 ± 0.58 vs. 2.74 ± 0.49, p = 0.008), type of Intensive Care Unit (3.28 ± 0.34 vs. 2.86 ± 0.62, p < 0.001), type of facility (3.16 ± 0.59 vs. 2.77 ± 0.61, p < 0.001), number of beds in the unit (3.07 ± 0.48 vs. 2.69 ± 0.48, p = 0.020), and the number of hours worked per week (3.06 ± 0.56 vs. 2.81 ± 0.60, p = 0.005). In contrast, supportive behaviors only differ based on the registered nurses’ age (3.22 ± 0.69 vs. 2.90 ± 0.64, p = 0.019).

Conclusions

The common End-of-Life Care perceived obstacle in Intensive Care Units was the lack of nursing education and training regarding the studies concept, which warrants immediate intervention such as on-job training. The common End-of-Life Care perceived supportive behavior in Intensive Care Units was when family members accepted that the patient was dying when nurses offered support to family members; motivational interventions are needed to sustain such behavior. Differences in the perceived obstacles and supportive behaviors should be leveraged for the benefit of patients, nurses, and hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrophisiological monitoring of pain in non-communicative critically ill patients Nurses' role in spiritual care for patients and families in intensive care units: A scoping review Experience of an advanced practice nurse in an intensive care unit Quality of work life and intention to rotate in intensive care nurses. Cross-sectional study Parent experiences of child loss in a paediatric intensive care unit on human connection and compassionate care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1