{"title":"尿毒清颗粒对糖尿病肾病炎症反应的影响:荟萃分析。","authors":"Peipei Zhou, Zhenning Hao, Weilong Xu, Jiangyi Yu","doi":"10.3892/etm.2023.12193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most severe chronic microvascular complications of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. The mechanism of inflammation underlying DKD has been attracting attention over recent years, but effective therapeutic strategies have remained elusive. Niaoduqing (NDQ) granules are one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of DKD in China, and it has therapeutic effects against inflammation in DKD. Therefore, the aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the inflammatory response outcomes and safety of NDQ granules for the treatment of DKD. The following databases were searched from their inception to 31st of May 2023 to obtain published accounts of relevant randomized controlled trials: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal, Wanfang, The Chinese Biomedicine, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The 'risk of bias' evaluation tool produced by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used for evaluating the quality, whereas Revman software (version 5.3) was used for meta-analysis. In total, 16 studies were included into the present study according to criteria, with a total of 1,526 patients. Compared with those in the control group, the results of the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of conventional treatment and NDQ granules may further decrease C-reactive protein [standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.76, -0.91; P<0.00001], TNF-α (SMD, -1.90; 95% CI, -2.35,-1.45; P<0.00001) and IL-6 (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.52,-0.91; P<0.0001) levels, whilst increasing the clinical effective rate (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14,1.29; P<0.00001), in patients with DKD. In terms of safety, a total of 34 and 39 patients included in the intervention and in the control group, respectively, developed adverse reactions. Results from the present analysis suggest that NDQ granules may be beneficial in suppressing inflammation caused by DKD when used in combination with conventional treatment, potentially guiding future directions in clinical practice. However, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the anti-inflammation response in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":94002,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and therapeutic medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/0e/etm-26-04-12193.PMC10515115.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Niaoduqing granules on inflammatory response of diabetic kidney disease: A meta‑analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Peipei Zhou, Zhenning Hao, Weilong Xu, Jiangyi Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/etm.2023.12193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most severe chronic microvascular complications of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. The mechanism of inflammation underlying DKD has been attracting attention over recent years, but effective therapeutic strategies have remained elusive. Niaoduqing (NDQ) granules are one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of DKD in China, and it has therapeutic effects against inflammation in DKD. Therefore, the aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the inflammatory response outcomes and safety of NDQ granules for the treatment of DKD. The following databases were searched from their inception to 31st of May 2023 to obtain published accounts of relevant randomized controlled trials: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal, Wanfang, The Chinese Biomedicine, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The 'risk of bias' evaluation tool produced by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used for evaluating the quality, whereas Revman software (version 5.3) was used for meta-analysis. In total, 16 studies were included into the present study according to criteria, with a total of 1,526 patients. Compared with those in the control group, the results of the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of conventional treatment and NDQ granules may further decrease C-reactive protein [standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.76, -0.91; P<0.00001], TNF-α (SMD, -1.90; 95% CI, -2.35,-1.45; P<0.00001) and IL-6 (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.52,-0.91; P<0.0001) levels, whilst increasing the clinical effective rate (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14,1.29; P<0.00001), in patients with DKD. In terms of safety, a total of 34 and 39 patients included in the intervention and in the control group, respectively, developed adverse reactions. Results from the present analysis suggest that NDQ granules may be beneficial in suppressing inflammation caused by DKD when used in combination with conventional treatment, potentially guiding future directions in clinical practice. However, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the anti-inflammation response in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and therapeutic medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/0e/etm-26-04-12193.PMC10515115.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and therapeutic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and therapeutic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
糖尿病肾病(DKD)是糖尿病最严重的慢性微血管并发症之一,也是世界范围内终末期肾病的主要原因。近年来,DKD的炎症机制一直备受关注,但有效的治疗策略仍然难以捉摸。尿毒清颗粒是我国治疗DKD最常用的药物之一,对DKD炎症有治疗作用。因此,本分析的目的是评估NDQ颗粒治疗DKD的炎症反应结果和安全性。从成立到2023年5月31日,检索了以下数据库,以获得相关随机对照试验的已发表报道:《中国国家知识基础设施》、《中国科学技术杂志》、万方、《中国生物医学》、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library。使用《Cochrane协作手册》编制的“偏倚风险”评估工具评估质量,而Revman软件(5.3版)用于荟萃分析。根据标准,本研究共纳入16项研究,共1526名患者。与对照组相比,荟萃分析结果显示,常规治疗和NDQ颗粒联合治疗可进一步降低C反应蛋白[标准化平均差(SMD),-1.33;95%置信区间(CI),-1.76,-0.91;P
Effects of Niaoduqing granules on inflammatory response of diabetic kidney disease: A meta‑analysis.
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most severe chronic microvascular complications of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. The mechanism of inflammation underlying DKD has been attracting attention over recent years, but effective therapeutic strategies have remained elusive. Niaoduqing (NDQ) granules are one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of DKD in China, and it has therapeutic effects against inflammation in DKD. Therefore, the aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the inflammatory response outcomes and safety of NDQ granules for the treatment of DKD. The following databases were searched from their inception to 31st of May 2023 to obtain published accounts of relevant randomized controlled trials: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal, Wanfang, The Chinese Biomedicine, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The 'risk of bias' evaluation tool produced by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used for evaluating the quality, whereas Revman software (version 5.3) was used for meta-analysis. In total, 16 studies were included into the present study according to criteria, with a total of 1,526 patients. Compared with those in the control group, the results of the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of conventional treatment and NDQ granules may further decrease C-reactive protein [standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.76, -0.91; P<0.00001], TNF-α (SMD, -1.90; 95% CI, -2.35,-1.45; P<0.00001) and IL-6 (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.52,-0.91; P<0.0001) levels, whilst increasing the clinical effective rate (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14,1.29; P<0.00001), in patients with DKD. In terms of safety, a total of 34 and 39 patients included in the intervention and in the control group, respectively, developed adverse reactions. Results from the present analysis suggest that NDQ granules may be beneficial in suppressing inflammation caused by DKD when used in combination with conventional treatment, potentially guiding future directions in clinical practice. However, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the anti-inflammation response in the future.