评估细胞毒性残留物管理的成本节约:摩洛哥国家肿瘤研究所对小瓶共享和剂量舍入技术的前瞻性研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/10781552231203403
Soumaya El Baraka, Ali Cherif Chefchaouni, Aya Bourdaime, Jean-Marie Ouedraogo, Oumaima Shytry, Mohammed-Jaouad Belahcen, Younes Rahali
{"title":"评估细胞毒性残留物管理的成本节约:摩洛哥国家肿瘤研究所对小瓶共享和剂量舍入技术的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Soumaya El Baraka, Ali Cherif Chefchaouni, Aya Bourdaime, Jean-Marie Ouedraogo, Oumaima Shytry, Mohammed-Jaouad Belahcen, Younes Rahali","doi":"10.1177/10781552231203403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most intravenous anticancer drugs are administered in a dose per unit area or body weight, if not promptly administered to another patient cytotoxic leftover would be destroyed. To contain wastage, low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. The objective of the study is to evaluate the cost saved through the use of the two cytotoxic waste management techniques implemented in National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit, vial sharing and dose rounding.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 6-month prospective single centre study from 1 February to 1 August 2023 at the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat in Morocco. The number of prepared preparations and amount of drug saved by both vial sharing and dose rounding was collected using the centralized chemotherapy preparation unit's 'leftover tracking file', the corresponding cost saved were calculated and then compared for each technique and with 2018 results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18,218 preparations were considered in the 6-month study. With the vial sharing technique 636,524.5 mg were saved corresponding to 246,031.4 (USD) saved cost, against 212,838.4 mg by dose rounding corresponding to 75,598.5 (USD) saved cost. This saving corresponded to a total of 321,629.4 (USD). Compared to the 2018 results leftovers costs saved by vial sharing corresponded to 289,972.05 (USD) by vial sharing technique for 1-year extrapolated period, and this study shows a saved cost of 321,629.9 (USD) by both vial sharing and dose rounding techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose rounding technique combined with vial sharing allowed National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit to limit expensive cytotoxic cost wastage, highlighting these technique benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1152-1159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating cost savings in cytotoxic leftover management: A prospective study of vial sharing and dose rounding techniques in the Moroccan National Institute of Oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Soumaya El Baraka, Ali Cherif Chefchaouni, Aya Bourdaime, Jean-Marie Ouedraogo, Oumaima Shytry, Mohammed-Jaouad Belahcen, Younes Rahali\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552231203403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most intravenous anticancer drugs are administered in a dose per unit area or body weight, if not promptly administered to another patient cytotoxic leftover would be destroyed. To contain wastage, low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. The objective of the study is to evaluate the cost saved through the use of the two cytotoxic waste management techniques implemented in National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit, vial sharing and dose rounding.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 6-month prospective single centre study from 1 February to 1 August 2023 at the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat in Morocco. The number of prepared preparations and amount of drug saved by both vial sharing and dose rounding was collected using the centralized chemotherapy preparation unit's 'leftover tracking file', the corresponding cost saved were calculated and then compared for each technique and with 2018 results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18,218 preparations were considered in the 6-month study. With the vial sharing technique 636,524.5 mg were saved corresponding to 246,031.4 (USD) saved cost, against 212,838.4 mg by dose rounding corresponding to 75,598.5 (USD) saved cost. This saving corresponded to a total of 321,629.4 (USD). Compared to the 2018 results leftovers costs saved by vial sharing corresponded to 289,972.05 (USD) by vial sharing technique for 1-year extrapolated period, and this study shows a saved cost of 321,629.9 (USD) by both vial sharing and dose rounding techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose rounding technique combined with vial sharing allowed National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit to limit expensive cytotoxic cost wastage, highlighting these technique benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1152-1159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231203403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231203403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数静脉注射抗癌药物都是以单位面积或体重的剂量给药的,如果不及时给药,其他患者的细胞毒性残留物会被破坏。为了控制浪费,非常希望采取低成本的措施来控制和减少支出,而不损害护理质量。本研究的目的是评估通过使用美国国家肿瘤研究所集中化疗准备单位实施的两种细胞毒性废物管理技术,即小瓶共享和剂量舍入,节省的成本。方法:2023年2月1日至8月1日在摩洛哥拉巴特国家肿瘤研究所进行的为期6个月的前瞻性单中心研究。使用集中化疗制剂单位的“剩余跟踪文件”收集通过小瓶共享和剂量舍入节省的制剂数量和药物量,计算相应的节省成本,然后将每种技术的节省成本与2018年的结果进行比较。结果:在为期6个月的研究中,总共考虑了18218种制剂。使用小瓶共享技术636524.5 mg,相当于节省了246031.4(美元)的成本,而212838.4 mg,对应于75598.5(美元)节省了成本。这笔节省共计321629.4美元。与2018年的结果相比,在1年的外推期内,小瓶共享技术节省的剩余成本相当于289972.05(美元),本研究显示,小瓶共享和剂量舍入技术节省了321629.9(美元)的成本。结论:剂量舍入技术与小瓶共享相结合,使国家肿瘤研究所的集中化疗准备单位能够限制昂贵的细胞毒性成本浪费,突出了这些技术的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating cost savings in cytotoxic leftover management: A prospective study of vial sharing and dose rounding techniques in the Moroccan National Institute of Oncology.

Objective: Most intravenous anticancer drugs are administered in a dose per unit area or body weight, if not promptly administered to another patient cytotoxic leftover would be destroyed. To contain wastage, low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. The objective of the study is to evaluate the cost saved through the use of the two cytotoxic waste management techniques implemented in National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit, vial sharing and dose rounding.

Method: A 6-month prospective single centre study from 1 February to 1 August 2023 at the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat in Morocco. The number of prepared preparations and amount of drug saved by both vial sharing and dose rounding was collected using the centralized chemotherapy preparation unit's 'leftover tracking file', the corresponding cost saved were calculated and then compared for each technique and with 2018 results.

Results: In total, 18,218 preparations were considered in the 6-month study. With the vial sharing technique 636,524.5 mg were saved corresponding to 246,031.4 (USD) saved cost, against 212,838.4 mg by dose rounding corresponding to 75,598.5 (USD) saved cost. This saving corresponded to a total of 321,629.4 (USD). Compared to the 2018 results leftovers costs saved by vial sharing corresponded to 289,972.05 (USD) by vial sharing technique for 1-year extrapolated period, and this study shows a saved cost of 321,629.9 (USD) by both vial sharing and dose rounding techniques.

Conclusion: Dose rounding technique combined with vial sharing allowed National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit to limit expensive cytotoxic cost wastage, highlighting these technique benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic surface contamination in hospitals: Current practices, challenges and perspectives. Cytomegalovirus viremia and hepatitis B reactivation in patient with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with pralsetinib. Workflow evaluation of environmental contamination with hazardous drugs during compounding and administration in an UK hospital. An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol. Hospital pharmacists' perceived competence in providing care to oncology patients - (HoPP-CoP2).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1