植物病原体作为杂草生物防治剂的引入:拮抗真菌是否是决定药剂成败的重要因素?

IF 2.1 Q3 MYCOLOGY Frontiers in fungal biology Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ffunb.2022.959753
Alana Den Breeyen, Claudia Lange, Simon V Fowler
{"title":"植物病原体作为杂草生物防治剂的引入:拮抗真菌是否是决定药剂成败的重要因素?","authors":"Alana Den Breeyen,&nbsp;Claudia Lange,&nbsp;Simon V Fowler","doi":"10.3389/ffunb.2022.959753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mycoparasitic interactions are common in nature, form part of the microbiota of plants, and are considered significant contributors to fungus-fungus antagonism. Mycoparasites kill plant pathogens, protect the plant from abiotic and biotic stressors, and reduce disease incidence and severity at the plant population level. Their exploitation as biocontrol agents in agriculture is well documented. However, mycoparasites may potentially affect classical fungal biocontrol agents of invasive weed species. Classical biological control, or biocontrol, of invasive weeds involves the intentional introduction of exotic, usually co-evolved plant pathogens and insects, for permanent establishment and long-term control of the target plant. Agent establishment, effectiveness, and safety are the critical elements for a successful weed biocontrol programme. Establishment and effectiveness of agents on the invasive plant often vary throughout the invaded range with about two-thirds of weed biocontrol agents failing to suppress their target weed. There are many documented reasons why weed biocontrol agents do not establish or are ineffective when they do, and the presence and accumulation of natural enemies in the invaded range is one of them. Endophyte-enriched, invasive weeds and those forming mutualistic associations with indigenous, native endophytes could explain the lack of consistency of some classical biological control introductions. However, another variable could be factored into the mix: mycoparasitism, where one fungus parasitises another, the natural enemies of the plant's natural enemies. In this review article, we introduce the concept of invasive weed biocontrol and the history of using plant pathogens as biocontrol agents. We discuss the success and failure of fungal agent programmes and delve into the patterns of success or failure, with a focus on the potential antagonistic role of endophytes and mycoparasites.</p>","PeriodicalId":73084,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in fungal biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512343/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant pathogens as introduced weed biological control agents: Could antagonistic fungi be important factors determining agent success or failure?\",\"authors\":\"Alana Den Breeyen,&nbsp;Claudia Lange,&nbsp;Simon V Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ffunb.2022.959753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mycoparasitic interactions are common in nature, form part of the microbiota of plants, and are considered significant contributors to fungus-fungus antagonism. Mycoparasites kill plant pathogens, protect the plant from abiotic and biotic stressors, and reduce disease incidence and severity at the plant population level. Their exploitation as biocontrol agents in agriculture is well documented. However, mycoparasites may potentially affect classical fungal biocontrol agents of invasive weed species. Classical biological control, or biocontrol, of invasive weeds involves the intentional introduction of exotic, usually co-evolved plant pathogens and insects, for permanent establishment and long-term control of the target plant. Agent establishment, effectiveness, and safety are the critical elements for a successful weed biocontrol programme. Establishment and effectiveness of agents on the invasive plant often vary throughout the invaded range with about two-thirds of weed biocontrol agents failing to suppress their target weed. There are many documented reasons why weed biocontrol agents do not establish or are ineffective when they do, and the presence and accumulation of natural enemies in the invaded range is one of them. Endophyte-enriched, invasive weeds and those forming mutualistic associations with indigenous, native endophytes could explain the lack of consistency of some classical biological control introductions. However, another variable could be factored into the mix: mycoparasitism, where one fungus parasitises another, the natural enemies of the plant's natural enemies. In this review article, we introduce the concept of invasive weed biocontrol and the history of using plant pathogens as biocontrol agents. We discuss the success and failure of fungal agent programmes and delve into the patterns of success or failure, with a focus on the potential antagonistic role of endophytes and mycoparasites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in fungal biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512343/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in fungal biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.959753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in fungal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.959753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

真菌与寄生虫的相互作用在自然界中很常见,是植物微生物群的一部分,被认为是真菌与真菌拮抗作用的重要因素。真菌寄生虫杀死植物病原体,保护植物免受非生物和生物胁迫,并在植物种群水平上降低疾病的发生率和严重程度。它们在农业中作为生物控制剂的开发有充分的记录。然而,真菌寄生虫可能会影响入侵杂草物种的经典真菌生物防治剂。入侵杂草的传统生物控制或生物控制涉及有意引入外来的、通常是共同进化的植物病原体和昆虫,以永久建立和长期控制目标植物。药剂的建立、有效性和安全性是杂草生物防治计划成功的关键因素。在整个入侵范围内,药剂对入侵植物的建立和有效性通常各不相同,约三分之二的杂草生物控制药剂无法抑制其目标杂草。杂草生物防治剂不能建立或建立时无效的原因有很多,天敌在入侵范围内的存在和积累就是其中之一。富含内生植物的入侵杂草以及与本地内生植物形成互惠共生关系的杂草可以解释一些经典生物防治引入缺乏一致性的原因。然而,另一个变量也可以考虑在内:真菌寄生,一种真菌寄生在另一种真菌上,即植物天敌的天敌。在这篇综述文章中,我们介绍了入侵杂草生物防治的概念和使用植物病原体作为生物防治剂的历史。我们讨论了真菌制剂计划的成功和失败,并深入研究了成功或失败的模式,重点是内生菌和真菌寄生虫的潜在拮抗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plant pathogens as introduced weed biological control agents: Could antagonistic fungi be important factors determining agent success or failure?

Mycoparasitic interactions are common in nature, form part of the microbiota of plants, and are considered significant contributors to fungus-fungus antagonism. Mycoparasites kill plant pathogens, protect the plant from abiotic and biotic stressors, and reduce disease incidence and severity at the plant population level. Their exploitation as biocontrol agents in agriculture is well documented. However, mycoparasites may potentially affect classical fungal biocontrol agents of invasive weed species. Classical biological control, or biocontrol, of invasive weeds involves the intentional introduction of exotic, usually co-evolved plant pathogens and insects, for permanent establishment and long-term control of the target plant. Agent establishment, effectiveness, and safety are the critical elements for a successful weed biocontrol programme. Establishment and effectiveness of agents on the invasive plant often vary throughout the invaded range with about two-thirds of weed biocontrol agents failing to suppress their target weed. There are many documented reasons why weed biocontrol agents do not establish or are ineffective when they do, and the presence and accumulation of natural enemies in the invaded range is one of them. Endophyte-enriched, invasive weeds and those forming mutualistic associations with indigenous, native endophytes could explain the lack of consistency of some classical biological control introductions. However, another variable could be factored into the mix: mycoparasitism, where one fungus parasitises another, the natural enemies of the plant's natural enemies. In this review article, we introduce the concept of invasive weed biocontrol and the history of using plant pathogens as biocontrol agents. We discuss the success and failure of fungal agent programmes and delve into the patterns of success or failure, with a focus on the potential antagonistic role of endophytes and mycoparasites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: The Sordariomycetes: an expanding resource with Big Data for mining in evolutionary genomics and transcriptomics. Dual-RNA-sequencing to elucidate the interactions between sorghum and Colletotrichum sublineola. Phosphate availability conditions caspofungin tolerance, capsule attachment and titan cell formation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Antagonistic interactions between maize seeds microbiome species and the late wilt disease agent, Magnaporthiopsis maydis. Opportunities for optimizing fungal biological control agents for long-term and effective management of insect pests of orchards and vineyards: a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1