败血症或感染性休克危重患者的输血触发因素:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Indian Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_329_22
Mohd Mustahsin, Souvik Maitra, Rahul Kumar Anand, Manish Soneja, Karan Madan, Vanlal Darlong, Dalim Kumar Baidya
{"title":"败血症或感染性休克危重患者的输血触发因素:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Mohd Mustahsin, Souvik Maitra, Rahul Kumar Anand, Manish Soneja, Karan Madan, Vanlal Darlong, Dalim Kumar Baidya","doi":"10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_329_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Current practice around transfusion trigger in critically ill sepsis patients is not clear. Moreover, any association of haemoglobin trigger and other transfusion parameters such as age of red blood cells (RBCs) at transfusion and number of units of RBCs transfused with mortality and other adverse outcomes need further assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients aged 18-70 yr and admitted to intensive care with a diagnosis of sepsis were included (n=108). Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were noted and various transfusion data, i.e., haemoglobin trigger, number of units of RBCs and the age of RBCs were recorded. Following outcome data were collected: 28 and 90 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and requirement of renal replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 108 participants, 78 (72.2%) survived till 28 days and 66 (61.1%) survived till 90 days. Transfusion trigger was 6.9 (6.7-7.1) g/dl [median (interquartile range)]. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval {CI}): 0.86 (0.78, 0.96); P=0.005], cumulative fluid balance (CFB) [aOR (95% CI): 0.99 (0.99, 0.99); P=0.005] and admission platelet count [aOR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.01, 2.84); P=0.043] were the predictors of 28 day mortality [model area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) 0.81]. APACHE II [aOR (95% CI): 0.88 (0.81, 0.97); P=0.013], CFB [a OR (95% CI): 0.99977 (0.99962, 0.99993); P=0.044] and transfusion trigger [aOR (95% CI): 3 (1.07, 8.34); P=0.035] were the predictors of 90 day mortality (model AUROC: 0.82).</p><p><strong>Interpretation & conclusions: </strong>In sepsis, patients admitted to the ICU, current practice suggests transfusion trigger is below 7 g/dl and it does not affect any adverse outcome including 28 day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10720963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfusion trigger in the critically ill with sepsis or septic shock: A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Mustahsin, Souvik Maitra, Rahul Kumar Anand, Manish Soneja, Karan Madan, Vanlal Darlong, Dalim Kumar Baidya\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_329_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Current practice around transfusion trigger in critically ill sepsis patients is not clear. Moreover, any association of haemoglobin trigger and other transfusion parameters such as age of red blood cells (RBCs) at transfusion and number of units of RBCs transfused with mortality and other adverse outcomes need further assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients aged 18-70 yr and admitted to intensive care with a diagnosis of sepsis were included (n=108). Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were noted and various transfusion data, i.e., haemoglobin trigger, number of units of RBCs and the age of RBCs were recorded. Following outcome data were collected: 28 and 90 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and requirement of renal replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 108 participants, 78 (72.2%) survived till 28 days and 66 (61.1%) survived till 90 days. Transfusion trigger was 6.9 (6.7-7.1) g/dl [median (interquartile range)]. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval {CI}): 0.86 (0.78, 0.96); P=0.005], cumulative fluid balance (CFB) [aOR (95% CI): 0.99 (0.99, 0.99); P=0.005] and admission platelet count [aOR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.01, 2.84); P=0.043] were the predictors of 28 day mortality [model area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) 0.81]. APACHE II [aOR (95% CI): 0.88 (0.81, 0.97); P=0.013], CFB [a OR (95% CI): 0.99977 (0.99962, 0.99993); P=0.044] and transfusion trigger [aOR (95% CI): 3 (1.07, 8.34); P=0.035] were the predictors of 90 day mortality (model AUROC: 0.82).</p><p><strong>Interpretation & conclusions: </strong>In sepsis, patients admitted to the ICU, current practice suggests transfusion trigger is below 7 g/dl and it does not affect any adverse outcome including 28 day mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10720963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_329_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_329_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:目前危重败血症患者输血触发的实践尚不清楚。此外,血红蛋白触发因素和其他输血参数(如输血时红细胞的年龄和输血的红细胞单位数)与死亡率和其他不良结果的任何关联都需要进一步评估。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了年龄在18-70岁并被诊断为败血症而接受重症监护的患者(n=108)。记录基线人口统计学、临床和实验室参数,并记录各种输血数据,即血红蛋白触发因素、红细胞单位数和红细胞年龄。收集以下结果数据:28天和90天死亡率、机械通气持续时间、血管升压药治疗、重症监护室(ICU)和住院时间以及肾脏替代治疗的要求。结果:在108名参与者中,78人(72.2%)存活至28天,66人(61.1%)存活至90天。输血触发因素为6.9(6.7-7.1)g/dl[中位数(四分位间距)]。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II[调整比值比(aOR)(95%置信区间{CI}):0.86(0.78,0.96);P=0.005],累积液体平衡(CFB)[aOR(95%CI):0.99(0.99,0.99);P=0.005]和入院血小板计数[aOR(95%CI):1.69(1.01,2.84);P=0.043]是28天死亡率的预测因子[受试者操作特征下的模型面积(AUROC)0.81],CFB[aOR(95%CI):0.99977(0.99962,0.99993);P=0.044]和输血触发因素[aOR(95%CI):3(1.07,8.34);P=0.035]是90天死亡率的预测因素(AUROC模型:0.82)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transfusion trigger in the critically ill with sepsis or septic shock: A prospective study.

Background & objectives: Current practice around transfusion trigger in critically ill sepsis patients is not clear. Moreover, any association of haemoglobin trigger and other transfusion parameters such as age of red blood cells (RBCs) at transfusion and number of units of RBCs transfused with mortality and other adverse outcomes need further assessment.

Methods: In this prospective study, patients aged 18-70 yr and admitted to intensive care with a diagnosis of sepsis were included (n=108). Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were noted and various transfusion data, i.e., haemoglobin trigger, number of units of RBCs and the age of RBCs were recorded. Following outcome data were collected: 28 and 90 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and requirement of renal replacement therapy.

Results: Of the total 108 participants, 78 (72.2%) survived till 28 days and 66 (61.1%) survived till 90 days. Transfusion trigger was 6.9 (6.7-7.1) g/dl [median (interquartile range)]. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval {CI}): 0.86 (0.78, 0.96); P=0.005], cumulative fluid balance (CFB) [aOR (95% CI): 0.99 (0.99, 0.99); P=0.005] and admission platelet count [aOR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.01, 2.84); P=0.043] were the predictors of 28 day mortality [model area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) 0.81]. APACHE II [aOR (95% CI): 0.88 (0.81, 0.97); P=0.013], CFB [a OR (95% CI): 0.99977 (0.99962, 0.99993); P=0.044] and transfusion trigger [aOR (95% CI): 3 (1.07, 8.34); P=0.035] were the predictors of 90 day mortality (model AUROC: 0.82).

Interpretation & conclusions: In sepsis, patients admitted to the ICU, current practice suggests transfusion trigger is below 7 g/dl and it does not affect any adverse outcome including 28 day mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
期刊最新文献
Dealing with the epidemic of drug use Regional variation in prevalence of frailty in India: Evidence from longitudinal ageing study in India (LASI) wave-1 Advances in TB diagnostics: A critical element for the elimination toolkit Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation Hospital level interventions to improve outcomes after injury in India, a LMIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1