使用传统和数字技术制作的部分义齿框架的患者满意度和准确性。

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2554Muehlemann10
E Muehlemann, N Al-Haj Husain, M Özcan
{"title":"使用传统和数字技术制作的部分义齿框架的患者满意度和准确性。","authors":"E Muehlemann, N Al-Haj Husain, M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2554Muehlemann10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report compares a conventional and a digital workflow for manufacturing metal frameworks for maxillary and mandibular removable partial dentures (RPDs). Two sets of maxillary and mandible RPDs were produced. The metal framework of one set of RPDs was produced conventionally using the lost wax casting technique. Intraoralscanning and computer-aided designing (CAD) were used to fabricate the metal frameworks of the other set of RPDs using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technology. The accuracy of fit of the two sets of RPDs was evaluated after 3 months using replica models. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Two years later, the fit accuracy of the DMLS prosthesis and patient satisfaction were re-evaluated. The accuracy of fit in the maxillary RPD with the DLMS manufactured metal framework showed better results in all areas except areas of rests (457 vs. 421 μm) and the major connector (850 vs. 512 μm). The mandibular RPD with DLMS manufactured metal framework showed only in the areas of the reciprocal arm and major connector better fit accuracy compared to the conventional RPD. The patient satisfaction with the DLMS manufactured RPDs was rated equally to the conventional one. The use of digital technologies in manufacturing RPDs seems promising regarding accuracy and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction and Accuracy of Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated using Conventional and Digital Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"E Muehlemann, N Al-Haj Husain, M Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2554Muehlemann10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This case report compares a conventional and a digital workflow for manufacturing metal frameworks for maxillary and mandibular removable partial dentures (RPDs). Two sets of maxillary and mandible RPDs were produced. The metal framework of one set of RPDs was produced conventionally using the lost wax casting technique. Intraoralscanning and computer-aided designing (CAD) were used to fabricate the metal frameworks of the other set of RPDs using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technology. The accuracy of fit of the two sets of RPDs was evaluated after 3 months using replica models. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Two years later, the fit accuracy of the DMLS prosthesis and patient satisfaction were re-evaluated. The accuracy of fit in the maxillary RPD with the DLMS manufactured metal framework showed better results in all areas except areas of rests (457 vs. 421 μm) and the major connector (850 vs. 512 μm). The mandibular RPD with DLMS manufactured metal framework showed only in the areas of the reciprocal arm and major connector better fit accuracy compared to the conventional RPD. The patient satisfaction with the DLMS manufactured RPDs was rated equally to the conventional one. The use of digital technologies in manufacturing RPDs seems promising regarding accuracy and patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2554Muehlemann10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2554Muehlemann10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本病例报告比较了制造上颌和下颌可摘局部义齿(RPD)金属框架的传统和数字工作流程。制作了两套上颌和下颌RPD。一套RPD的金属框架采用传统的失蜡铸造技术生产。使用直接金属激光烧结(DMLS)技术,使用口腔内扫描和计算机辅助设计(CAD)来制造另一组RPD的金属框架。3个月后,使用复制模型评估两组RPD的拟合准确性。评估患者满意度。两年后,对DMLS假体的拟合精度和患者满意度进行了重新评估。DLMS制造的金属框架在上颌RPD中的拟合精度在除休息区(457对421μm)和主连接区(850对512μm)之外的所有区域都显示出更好的结果。与传统RPD相比,DLMS制造的金属框架的下颌RPD仅在倒臂和主连接器的区域显示出更好的装配精度。患者对DLMS制造的RPD的满意度与传统RPD的评分相同。数字技术在制造RPD中的应用在准确性和患者满意度方面似乎很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Satisfaction and Accuracy of Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated using Conventional and Digital Techniques.

This case report compares a conventional and a digital workflow for manufacturing metal frameworks for maxillary and mandibular removable partial dentures (RPDs). Two sets of maxillary and mandible RPDs were produced. The metal framework of one set of RPDs was produced conventionally using the lost wax casting technique. Intraoralscanning and computer-aided designing (CAD) were used to fabricate the metal frameworks of the other set of RPDs using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technology. The accuracy of fit of the two sets of RPDs was evaluated after 3 months using replica models. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Two years later, the fit accuracy of the DMLS prosthesis and patient satisfaction were re-evaluated. The accuracy of fit in the maxillary RPD with the DLMS manufactured metal framework showed better results in all areas except areas of rests (457 vs. 421 μm) and the major connector (850 vs. 512 μm). The mandibular RPD with DLMS manufactured metal framework showed only in the areas of the reciprocal arm and major connector better fit accuracy compared to the conventional RPD. The patient satisfaction with the DLMS manufactured RPDs was rated equally to the conventional one. The use of digital technologies in manufacturing RPDs seems promising regarding accuracy and patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Influence of Surface Roughness on the Adhesion of Hydroxyapatite Coatings to Titanium and Titanium Alloy Surfaces: A Systematic Review of in vitro Experimental Studies. Performance of Fiberglass Posts Versus Fiber- Reinforced Resin Composites in Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Without Ferrule: A Systematic Review. Assessment of Efficacy of Implant Screwdrivers' During Multiple Tightening/ Untightening Cycles. An in vitro Study. Hybrid Full-Arch Rehabilitation Using Conventional And Zygomatic Implants: A Short-Term Retrospective Analysis. Clinical Survival of Indirect, Posterior Fiber-Reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prosthesis: Up to 15 Years of Prospective Clinical Follow Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1