全面、高度以患者为中心的COPD自我管理支持计划的可行性试验。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0419
Alex D Federman, Rachel O'Conor, Jeannys Nnemnbeng, Jyoti Ankam, Danielle McDermott, Peter K Lindenauer, Michael S Wolf, Juan P Wisnivesky
{"title":"全面、高度以患者为中心的COPD自我管理支持计划的可行性试验。","authors":"Alex D Federman, Rachel O'Conor, Jeannys Nnemnbeng, Jyoti Ankam, Danielle McDermott, Peter K Lindenauer, Michael S Wolf, Juan P Wisnivesky","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the feasibility of a novel self-management support intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial involving patients ≥40 years with severe or very severe COPD in New York, New York (n=59). Community health workers screened patients and addressed barriers to COPD self-management. Patients were also offered home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) and an antibiotic and steroid rescue pack. Control patients received general COPD education. Clinical outcomes for intervention and control were compared by difference-in-differences (DiD) at baseline and 6 months. The study was not powered for statistically significant differences for any measure. Feasibility measures were collected at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were high rates of completion of intervention activities, including 75% of patients undergoing evaluation for and participating in HBPR. Most (92%) intervention patients said the program was very or extremely helpful and 96% said they would participate again. Clinical outcomes generally favored the intervention: COPD assessment test, DiD -1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.9 to 3.6); 6-minute walk test distance, DiD 7.4 meters (95% CI -45.1 to 59.8); self-reported hospitalizations, DiD -9.8% (95% CI -42.3% to 22.8%); medication adherence, DiD 7.7% (-29.6%, 45.0%), and Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire, DiD 86 (95% CI -283 to 455). Intervention patients reported more emergency department visits, DiD 10.6% (95% CI 17.7% to 38.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A highly patient-centered, self-management support intervention for people with COPD was well received by patients and associated with potential improvements in clinical and self-management outcomes. A fully powered study of the intervention is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":"13-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility Trial of a Comprehensive, Highly Patient-Centered COPD Self-Management Support Program.\",\"authors\":\"Alex D Federman, Rachel O'Conor, Jeannys Nnemnbeng, Jyoti Ankam, Danielle McDermott, Peter K Lindenauer, Michael S Wolf, Juan P Wisnivesky\",\"doi\":\"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the feasibility of a novel self-management support intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial involving patients ≥40 years with severe or very severe COPD in New York, New York (n=59). Community health workers screened patients and addressed barriers to COPD self-management. Patients were also offered home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) and an antibiotic and steroid rescue pack. Control patients received general COPD education. Clinical outcomes for intervention and control were compared by difference-in-differences (DiD) at baseline and 6 months. The study was not powered for statistically significant differences for any measure. Feasibility measures were collected at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were high rates of completion of intervention activities, including 75% of patients undergoing evaluation for and participating in HBPR. Most (92%) intervention patients said the program was very or extremely helpful and 96% said they would participate again. Clinical outcomes generally favored the intervention: COPD assessment test, DiD -1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.9 to 3.6); 6-minute walk test distance, DiD 7.4 meters (95% CI -45.1 to 59.8); self-reported hospitalizations, DiD -9.8% (95% CI -42.3% to 22.8%); medication adherence, DiD 7.7% (-29.6%, 45.0%), and Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire, DiD 86 (95% CI -283 to 455). Intervention patients reported more emergency department visits, DiD 10.6% (95% CI 17.7% to 38.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A highly patient-centered, self-management support intervention for people with COPD was well received by patients and associated with potential improvements in clinical and self-management outcomes. A fully powered study of the intervention is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0419\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:测试一种新型的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者自我管理支持干预的可行性。方法:我们在纽约州纽约市进行了一项可行性随机对照试验,涉及≥40岁的重度或极重度COPD患者(n=59)。社区卫生工作者对患者进行筛查,并解决COPD自我管理的障碍。患者还接受了家庭肺部康复(HBPR)和抗生素和类固醇救援包。对照组患者接受了一般COPD教育。通过基线和6个月的差异(DiD)比较干预和对照的临床结果。这项研究没有任何统计学上的显著差异。可行性措施在6个月时收集。结果:干预活动的完成率很高,其中75%的患者正在接受HBPR评估并参与其中。大多数(92%)干预患者表示该项目非常或非常有帮助,96%的患者表示他们会再次参与。临床结果普遍支持干预:COPD评估测试,DiD-1.1(95%CI-5.9至3.6);6分钟步行测试距离,DiD 7.4米(95%CI-45.1至59.8);自我报告的住院情况,DiD-9.8%(95%CI-42.3%至22.8%);药物依从性,DiD 7.7%(-29.6%,45.0%),PAAQ,DiD 86(95%CI-283-455)。干预患者报告了更多的ED就诊,DiD为10.6%(95%CI 17.7%-38.8%)。结论:对COPD患者进行高度以患者为中心的自我管理支持干预受到患者的欢迎,并与临床和自我管理结果的潜在改善有关。有必要对干预措施进行全面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility Trial of a Comprehensive, Highly Patient-Centered COPD Self-Management Support Program.

Purpose: To test the feasibility of a novel self-management support intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial involving patients ≥40 years with severe or very severe COPD in New York, New York (n=59). Community health workers screened patients and addressed barriers to COPD self-management. Patients were also offered home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) and an antibiotic and steroid rescue pack. Control patients received general COPD education. Clinical outcomes for intervention and control were compared by difference-in-differences (DiD) at baseline and 6 months. The study was not powered for statistically significant differences for any measure. Feasibility measures were collected at 6 months.

Results: There were high rates of completion of intervention activities, including 75% of patients undergoing evaluation for and participating in HBPR. Most (92%) intervention patients said the program was very or extremely helpful and 96% said they would participate again. Clinical outcomes generally favored the intervention: COPD assessment test, DiD -1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.9 to 3.6); 6-minute walk test distance, DiD 7.4 meters (95% CI -45.1 to 59.8); self-reported hospitalizations, DiD -9.8% (95% CI -42.3% to 22.8%); medication adherence, DiD 7.7% (-29.6%, 45.0%), and Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire, DiD 86 (95% CI -283 to 455). Intervention patients reported more emergency department visits, DiD 10.6% (95% CI 17.7% to 38.8%).

Conclusions: A highly patient-centered, self-management support intervention for people with COPD was well received by patients and associated with potential improvements in clinical and self-management outcomes. A fully powered study of the intervention is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Clinical Implications of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Colonization in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients. Validation of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Recording in Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review. A Novel Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Acute Heart Failure in Intensive Care Unit Patients with COPD. Effect of Common Medications on Longitudinal Pectoralis Muscle Area in Smokers. Impact of Pharmacist Inhaler Prescribing at Discharge for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Readmission Rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1