双卵巢刺激周期中的黄体期刺激不受卵泡刺激素(FSH)受体基因型的影响:双卵巢刺激是有益的,独立于卵泡刺激素受体680位的基因型。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Pharmacogenetics and genomics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1097/FPC.0000000000000511
Mónica Hortal, Belén Lledo, Jose A Ortiz, Ana Fuentes, Cristina García-Ajofrín, Ruth Romero, Alba Cascales, Andrea Bernabeu, Rafael Bernabeu
{"title":"双卵巢刺激周期中的黄体期刺激不受卵泡刺激素(FSH)受体基因型的影响:双卵巢刺激是有益的,独立于卵泡刺激素受体680位的基因型。","authors":"Mónica Hortal, Belén Lledo, Jose A Ortiz, Ana Fuentes, Cristina García-Ajofrín, Ruth Romero, Alba Cascales, Andrea Bernabeu, Rafael Bernabeu","doi":"10.1097/FPC.0000000000000511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) genotype influences the outcome of ovarian stimulation treatment in luteal phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 299 patients were included in a retrospective study between July 2017 and December 2021. These patients carried out a double stimulation protocol and the variant Asn680Ser (rs6166; c.2039A>G) of FSH receptor was genotyped either as part of the pre-treatment fertility tests or for the current study. Patients undergoing a double stimulation treatment who could not be genotyped were excluded from this analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results obtained from ovarian stimulation in luteal phase were better than those obtained in conventional follicular phase. Statistically significant differences ( P  < 0.001) were found in the number of retrieved oocytes (5.47 vs. 4.18), retrieved MII (4.52 vs. 3.29) and fertilised oocytes (3.81 vs. 2.20). Furthermore, these differences remained regardless of the FSH receptor genotype for the 680 position in all groups ( P  < 0.05). In addition, stimulation in luteal phase lasts longer and requires more gonadotropins than in follicular phase. This is especially noteworthy in patients with Ser/Ser genotype, who required a slightly higher dose of gonadotropins compared to other genotypes in luteal phase, as previously observed in the follicular phase for this genotype. No significant differences in age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle count, BMI and type of trigger used in luteal phase were observed among groups of patients with different FSH receptor genotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All patients undergoing IVF seem to benefit from luteal phase ovarian stimulation, regardless of their FSHR genotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":19763,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenetics and genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Luteal phase stimulation in double ovarian stimulation cycles is not affected by the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor genotype: double ovarian stimulation is beneficial independently of the genotype at position 680 of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor.\",\"authors\":\"Mónica Hortal, Belén Lledo, Jose A Ortiz, Ana Fuentes, Cristina García-Ajofrín, Ruth Romero, Alba Cascales, Andrea Bernabeu, Rafael Bernabeu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FPC.0000000000000511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) genotype influences the outcome of ovarian stimulation treatment in luteal phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 299 patients were included in a retrospective study between July 2017 and December 2021. These patients carried out a double stimulation protocol and the variant Asn680Ser (rs6166; c.2039A>G) of FSH receptor was genotyped either as part of the pre-treatment fertility tests or for the current study. Patients undergoing a double stimulation treatment who could not be genotyped were excluded from this analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results obtained from ovarian stimulation in luteal phase were better than those obtained in conventional follicular phase. Statistically significant differences ( P  < 0.001) were found in the number of retrieved oocytes (5.47 vs. 4.18), retrieved MII (4.52 vs. 3.29) and fertilised oocytes (3.81 vs. 2.20). Furthermore, these differences remained regardless of the FSH receptor genotype for the 680 position in all groups ( P  < 0.05). In addition, stimulation in luteal phase lasts longer and requires more gonadotropins than in follicular phase. This is especially noteworthy in patients with Ser/Ser genotype, who required a slightly higher dose of gonadotropins compared to other genotypes in luteal phase, as previously observed in the follicular phase for this genotype. No significant differences in age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle count, BMI and type of trigger used in luteal phase were observed among groups of patients with different FSH receptor genotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All patients undergoing IVF seem to benefit from luteal phase ovarian stimulation, regardless of their FSHR genotype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacogenetics and genomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacogenetics and genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000511\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenetics and genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定卵泡刺激素受体(FSHR)基因型是否影响黄体期卵巢刺激治疗的结果。方法:在2017年7月至2021年12月期间,共有299名患者参与了一项回顾性研究。这些患者进行了双重刺激方案,并对FSH受体的变体Asn680Ser(rs6166;c.2039A>G)进行了基因分型,作为治疗前生育能力测试的一部分或当前研究的一部分。接受双重刺激治疗的不能进行基因分型的患者被排除在该分析之外。结果:黄体期卵巢刺激效果优于常规卵泡期。统计学显著性差异(P 结论:所有接受试管婴儿的患者似乎都受益于黄体期卵巢刺激,无论其FSHR基因型如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Luteal phase stimulation in double ovarian stimulation cycles is not affected by the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor genotype: double ovarian stimulation is beneficial independently of the genotype at position 680 of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor.

Objectives: To determine whether follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) genotype influences the outcome of ovarian stimulation treatment in luteal phase.

Methods: A total of 299 patients were included in a retrospective study between July 2017 and December 2021. These patients carried out a double stimulation protocol and the variant Asn680Ser (rs6166; c.2039A>G) of FSH receptor was genotyped either as part of the pre-treatment fertility tests or for the current study. Patients undergoing a double stimulation treatment who could not be genotyped were excluded from this analysis.

Results: The results obtained from ovarian stimulation in luteal phase were better than those obtained in conventional follicular phase. Statistically significant differences ( P  < 0.001) were found in the number of retrieved oocytes (5.47 vs. 4.18), retrieved MII (4.52 vs. 3.29) and fertilised oocytes (3.81 vs. 2.20). Furthermore, these differences remained regardless of the FSH receptor genotype for the 680 position in all groups ( P  < 0.05). In addition, stimulation in luteal phase lasts longer and requires more gonadotropins than in follicular phase. This is especially noteworthy in patients with Ser/Ser genotype, who required a slightly higher dose of gonadotropins compared to other genotypes in luteal phase, as previously observed in the follicular phase for this genotype. No significant differences in age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle count, BMI and type of trigger used in luteal phase were observed among groups of patients with different FSH receptor genotypes.

Conclusion: All patients undergoing IVF seem to benefit from luteal phase ovarian stimulation, regardless of their FSHR genotype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacogenetics and genomics
Pharmacogenetics and genomics 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​Pharmacogenetics and Genomics is devoted to the rapid publication of research papers, brief review articles and short communications on genetic determinants in response to drugs and other chemicals in humans and animals. The Journal brings together papers from the entire spectrum of biomedical research and science, including biochemistry, bioinformatics, clinical pharmacology, clinical pharmacy, epidemiology, genetics, genomics, molecular biology, pharmacology, pharmaceutical sciences, and toxicology. Under a single cover, the Journal provides a forum for all aspects of the genetics and genomics of host response to exogenous chemicals: from the gene to the clinic.
期刊最新文献
Influence of CYP2C9 phenotypes on phenytoin plasma concentration in neurosurgical Brazilian patients. Prenatal efavirenz exposure is independently associated with maternal, but not fetal CYP2B6 genotype. Impact of UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 polymorphisms on lamotrigine plasma concentration in patients with bipolar disorder. Comparative performance of pharmacogenetics-based warfarin dosing algorithms in Chinese population: use of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to explore dosing regimen through clinical trial simulation. Differential distribution of NAT2 polymorphisms and NAT2 acetylator phenotypes among indigenous populations of the Brazilian Amazon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1