一种新的有前景的尿动力学压力性尿失禁护理方法可以帮助更年期妇女。

IF 2.5 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Przeglad Menopauzalny Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-11 DOI:10.5114/pm.2023.131058
Wael Khafagy, Walaa ElBassioune, Mahmoud Rady, Elmetwally Farouk, Ehab Elhelw, Ahmed Saeed, Ahmed Mahmoud, Hamada Abuelmatti, Ahmed Elsheikh, Mohamed Mahmoud, Mohammed Hussein, Ahmed Zaky, Ahmed Abdeltawab, Soliman Ali, Muhammad Altoraky, Mahmoud Hegazy, Ahmed Almorsy, Moatazza Alghazaly, Mohamed Rehan, Esam Elnady, Saed Khater, Alaa Mahmoud, Ahmed Elsayed, Hazem Deif
{"title":"一种新的有前景的尿动力学压力性尿失禁护理方法可以帮助更年期妇女。","authors":"Wael Khafagy,&nbsp;Walaa ElBassioune,&nbsp;Mahmoud Rady,&nbsp;Elmetwally Farouk,&nbsp;Ehab Elhelw,&nbsp;Ahmed Saeed,&nbsp;Ahmed Mahmoud,&nbsp;Hamada Abuelmatti,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsheikh,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud,&nbsp;Mohammed Hussein,&nbsp;Ahmed Zaky,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdeltawab,&nbsp;Soliman Ali,&nbsp;Muhammad Altoraky,&nbsp;Mahmoud Hegazy,&nbsp;Ahmed Almorsy,&nbsp;Moatazza Alghazaly,&nbsp;Mohamed Rehan,&nbsp;Esam Elnady,&nbsp;Saed Khater,&nbsp;Alaa Mahmoud,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsayed,&nbsp;Hazem Deif","doi":"10.5114/pm.2023.131058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision mini-sling in the surgical treatment of postmenopausal urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to the standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective study was carried out in two tertiary centres; Al-Azhar University Maternity & Urology Hospitals. A total of 120 postmenopausal women with urodynamic SUI were randomized to undergo either single-incision mini-sling (<i>n</i> = 60) or standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling procedure (<i>n</i> = 60) from May 2019 until Oct 2021. Main outcome measures: efficacy was evaluated utilizing objective cure rate (cough stress test) and subjective cure rate (Sandvik incontinence severity index and International Consultations on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative pain (using a visual analogue scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) and transobturator tape (TOT) groups had no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective cure rates (p > 0.05). Compared with the transvaginal tape O group, patients in the SIMS group had significantly less postoperative pain, shorter operative duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.05). No significant difference in perioperative complications was observed between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-incision mini-sling was superior to TOT in postmenopausal as SIMS is of similar effectiveness, more safe and minimally invasive with earlier ambulance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55643,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","volume":"22 3","pages":"121-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/b7/MR-22-51355.PMC10566331.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new promising approach to urodynamic stress urinary incontinence care can help menopausal women.\",\"authors\":\"Wael Khafagy,&nbsp;Walaa ElBassioune,&nbsp;Mahmoud Rady,&nbsp;Elmetwally Farouk,&nbsp;Ehab Elhelw,&nbsp;Ahmed Saeed,&nbsp;Ahmed Mahmoud,&nbsp;Hamada Abuelmatti,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsheikh,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud,&nbsp;Mohammed Hussein,&nbsp;Ahmed Zaky,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdeltawab,&nbsp;Soliman Ali,&nbsp;Muhammad Altoraky,&nbsp;Mahmoud Hegazy,&nbsp;Ahmed Almorsy,&nbsp;Moatazza Alghazaly,&nbsp;Mohamed Rehan,&nbsp;Esam Elnady,&nbsp;Saed Khater,&nbsp;Alaa Mahmoud,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsayed,&nbsp;Hazem Deif\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pm.2023.131058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision mini-sling in the surgical treatment of postmenopausal urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to the standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective study was carried out in two tertiary centres; Al-Azhar University Maternity & Urology Hospitals. A total of 120 postmenopausal women with urodynamic SUI were randomized to undergo either single-incision mini-sling (<i>n</i> = 60) or standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling procedure (<i>n</i> = 60) from May 2019 until Oct 2021. Main outcome measures: efficacy was evaluated utilizing objective cure rate (cough stress test) and subjective cure rate (Sandvik incontinence severity index and International Consultations on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative pain (using a visual analogue scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) and transobturator tape (TOT) groups had no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective cure rates (p > 0.05). Compared with the transvaginal tape O group, patients in the SIMS group had significantly less postoperative pain, shorter operative duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.05). No significant difference in perioperative complications was observed between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-incision mini-sling was superior to TOT in postmenopausal as SIMS is of similar effectiveness, more safe and minimally invasive with earlier ambulance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Menopauzalny\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"121-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/b7/MR-22-51355.PMC10566331.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Menopauzalny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.131058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.131058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究的目的是与标准的经闭孔尿道中段吊带相比,评估单切口迷你吊带在绝经后尿动力应激性尿失禁(SUI)外科治疗中的有效性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究在两个高等教育中心进行;爱资哈尔大学妇产泌尿医院。从2019年5月到2021年10月,共有120名患有尿动力学SUI的绝经后妇女被随机选择接受单切口迷你吊带(n=60)或标准经闭孔尿道中段吊带手术(n=60。主要结果指标:使用客观治愈率(咳嗽压力测试)和主观治愈率(Sandvik失禁严重程度指数和国际失禁咨询问卷-简式)、术中和术后并发症评估疗效,结果:单切口小吊带(SIMS)组和经阴道O带(TOT)组的主观和客观治愈率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),两组围手术期并发症无显著差异。结论:单切口小吊带在绝经后妇女中优于TOT,因为SIMS与早期救护车具有相似的疗效、更安全和微创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new promising approach to urodynamic stress urinary incontinence care can help menopausal women.

Introduction: The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision mini-sling in the surgical treatment of postmenopausal urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to the standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling.

Material and methods: This prospective study was carried out in two tertiary centres; Al-Azhar University Maternity & Urology Hospitals. A total of 120 postmenopausal women with urodynamic SUI were randomized to undergo either single-incision mini-sling (n = 60) or standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling procedure (n = 60) from May 2019 until Oct 2021. Main outcome measures: efficacy was evaluated utilizing objective cure rate (cough stress test) and subjective cure rate (Sandvik incontinence severity index and International Consultations on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative pain (using a visual analogue scale).

Results: The single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) and transobturator tape (TOT) groups had no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective cure rates (p > 0.05). Compared with the transvaginal tape O group, patients in the SIMS group had significantly less postoperative pain, shorter operative duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (all p-values < 0.05). No significant difference in perioperative complications was observed between both groups.

Conclusions: Single-incision mini-sling was superior to TOT in postmenopausal as SIMS is of similar effectiveness, more safe and minimally invasive with earlier ambulance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Przeglad Menopauzalny
Przeglad Menopauzalny OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Menopausal Review is a scientific bimonthly aimed at gynecologists and endocrinologists.
期刊最新文献
Cervical carcinoma and diabetes mellitus among women in Southern India. COVID-19 phobia, personality traits and menopausal symptoms in women in the climacteric period. Level of body mass index, functional fitness, quality of life, and satisfaction with life among women aged 60+ years participating in an organised pro-health training programme. Oncosexology - selected issues taking into account the problem of sexological care of patients with cancer. Response to the paper by Carranza-Lira S et al. The relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and cognitive function and depression in postmenopausal women. Prz Menopauz 2023; 22: 21-23.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1