巴西农业科学系学生对动物福利的看法:基于个人资料的方法。

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/10888705.2023.2268505
Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzi, Susana Cardoso, Cristian Rogério Foguesatto, João Augusto Rossi Borges
{"title":"巴西农业科学系学生对动物福利的看法:基于个人资料的方法。","authors":"Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzi,&nbsp;Susana Cardoso,&nbsp;Cristian Rogério Foguesatto,&nbsp;João Augusto Rossi Borges","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2023.2268505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The agricultural professionals are ethically obligated to provide good care for the animals under their care. We analysed Brazilian agricultural science students' profiles based on their perceptions of animal welfare (AW). The survey included 239 students from agronomy, animal science, and veterinary courses in 44 universities. A factor analysis and a cluster analysis identified four students' profiles. \"The farm animal stewards\" group (n= 79) focused their perceptions of AW on basic health and functioning as a basis for meat, wool, egg, and dairy production, while the \"the industrial view\" group (n= 15), in the profitability and economic factors. \"The animal rights position\" (n= 76), in the face of conflicting interests (animals vs. owners), perceive that the animal's interest should prevail and give an equal treatment for all species. \"The balanced\" group (n= 69) incorporates concepts from animal and human to explain their perceptions. The students' perception of AW is multifaceted and influenced by value-based ideas about what is important or desirable for animals and all stakeholders. Scientific fields focusing on AW need to be emphasized within agricultural science curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":56277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of Brazilian Agricultural Sciences Students on Animal Welfare: A Profile-based Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzi,&nbsp;Susana Cardoso,&nbsp;Cristian Rogério Foguesatto,&nbsp;João Augusto Rossi Borges\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10888705.2023.2268505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The agricultural professionals are ethically obligated to provide good care for the animals under their care. We analysed Brazilian agricultural science students' profiles based on their perceptions of animal welfare (AW). The survey included 239 students from agronomy, animal science, and veterinary courses in 44 universities. A factor analysis and a cluster analysis identified four students' profiles. \\\"The farm animal stewards\\\" group (n= 79) focused their perceptions of AW on basic health and functioning as a basis for meat, wool, egg, and dairy production, while the \\\"the industrial view\\\" group (n= 15), in the profitability and economic factors. \\\"The animal rights position\\\" (n= 76), in the face of conflicting interests (animals vs. owners), perceive that the animal's interest should prevail and give an equal treatment for all species. \\\"The balanced\\\" group (n= 69) incorporates concepts from animal and human to explain their perceptions. The students' perception of AW is multifaceted and influenced by value-based ideas about what is important or desirable for animals and all stakeholders. Scientific fields focusing on AW need to be emphasized within agricultural science curriculum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2023.2268505\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2023.2268505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业专业人员在道德上有义务为他们照顾的动物提供良好的照顾。我们根据巴西农业科学学生对动物福利(AW)的看法分析了他们的个人资料。这项调查包括44所大学的239名农学、动物科学和兽医课程的学生。因子分析和聚类分析确定了四名学生的个人资料。“农场动物管理员”组(n=79)将他们对AW的看法集中在基本健康和作为肉类、羊毛、鸡蛋和乳制品生产基础的功能上,而“工业观”组(n=15)则集中在盈利能力和经济因素上。“动物权利立场”(n=76),面对利益冲突(动物与所有者),认为动物的利益应该占上风,并给予所有物种平等待遇。“平衡”组(n=69)结合了动物和人类的概念来解释他们的感知。学生对AW的看法是多方面的,并受到基于价值观的想法的影响,这些想法对动物和所有利益相关者来说是重要的或可取的。农业科学课程中需要强调以AW为重点的科学领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perception of Brazilian Agricultural Sciences Students on Animal Welfare: A Profile-based Approach.

The agricultural professionals are ethically obligated to provide good care for the animals under their care. We analysed Brazilian agricultural science students' profiles based on their perceptions of animal welfare (AW). The survey included 239 students from agronomy, animal science, and veterinary courses in 44 universities. A factor analysis and a cluster analysis identified four students' profiles. "The farm animal stewards" group (n= 79) focused their perceptions of AW on basic health and functioning as a basis for meat, wool, egg, and dairy production, while the "the industrial view" group (n= 15), in the profitability and economic factors. "The animal rights position" (n= 76), in the face of conflicting interests (animals vs. owners), perceive that the animal's interest should prevail and give an equal treatment for all species. "The balanced" group (n= 69) incorporates concepts from animal and human to explain their perceptions. The students' perception of AW is multifaceted and influenced by value-based ideas about what is important or desirable for animals and all stakeholders. Scientific fields focusing on AW need to be emphasized within agricultural science curriculum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) publishes articles on methods of experimentation, husbandry, and care that demonstrably enhance the welfare of nonhuman animals in various settings. For administrative purposes, manuscripts are categorized into the following four content areas: welfare issues arising in laboratory, farm, companion animal, and wildlife/zoo settings. Manuscripts of up to 7,000 words are accepted that present new empirical data or a reevaluation of available data, conceptual or theoretical analysis, or demonstrations relating to some issue of animal welfare science. JAAWS also publishes brief research reports of up to 3,500 words that consist of (1) pilot studies, (2) descriptions of innovative practices, (3) studies of interest to a particular region, or (4) studies done by scholars who are new to the field or new to academic publishing. In addition, JAAWS publishes book reviews and literature reviews by invitation only.
期刊最新文献
Both Ends of the Leash: Animals in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities, Views of Experienced Animal Trainers/handlers Working in Residential Aged Care Facilities. Sociodemographic factors and dog ownership practices that perpetuate the roaming of owned dogs in selected urban and rural settings in Uganda. Effects of different husbandry systems and attitudes of cattle farmers on the behavior and welfare of cattle in Germany. Attitudes and Behaviours Towards Cats and Barriers to Stray Cat Management in Bulgaria. Local People Standings on Existing Farm Animal Welfare Legislation in the BRIC Countries and the USA. Comparison with Western European Legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1