Bumps和BaBies纵向研究(BaBBLeS):一项针对初为人母的多站点队列研究,旨在评估Baby Buddy应用程序的有效性。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES mHealth Pub Date : 2019-09-25 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05
Toity Deave, Samuel Ginja, Trudy Goodenough, Elizabeth Bailey, Lukasz Piwek, Jane Coad, Crispin Day, Samantha Nightingale, Sally Kendall, Raghu Lingam
{"title":"Bumps和BaBies纵向研究(BaBBLeS):一项针对初为人母的多站点队列研究,旨在评估Baby Buddy应用程序的有效性。","authors":"Toity Deave,&nbsp;Samuel Ginja,&nbsp;Trudy Goodenough,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bailey,&nbsp;Lukasz Piwek,&nbsp;Jane Coad,&nbsp;Crispin Day,&nbsp;Samantha Nightingale,&nbsp;Sally Kendall,&nbsp;Raghu Lingam","doi":"10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health mobile applications (apps) have become very popular, including apps specifically designed to support women during the ante- and post-natal periods. However, there is currently limited evidence for the effectiveness of such apps at improving pregnancy and parenting outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a pregnancy and parenting app, Baby Buddy, in improving maternal self-efficacy at 3 months post-birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 16 years old or over, first-time mothers, 12-16 weeks gestation, recruited by midwives from five English study sites. The Tool to Measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE) (primary outcome) was used to compare mothers at 3 months post-birth who had downloaded the Baby Buddy app with those who had not downloaded the app, controlling for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eighty-eight participants provided valid data at baseline (12-16 weeks gestation), 296 participants provided valid data at 3 months post-birth, 114 (38.5%) of whom reported that they had used the Baby Buddy app. Baby Buddy app users were more likely to use pregnancy or parenting apps (80.7% <i>vs</i>. 69.6%, P=0.035), more likely to have been introduced to the app by a healthcare professional (P=0.005) and have a lower median score for perceived social support (81 <i>vs</i>. 83, P=0.034) than non-app users. The Baby Buddy app did not elicit a statistically significant change in TOPSE scores from baseline to 3 months post-birth [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 2.13, P=0.730]. Finding out about the Baby Buddy app from a healthcare professional appeared to grant no additional benefit to app users compared to all other participants in terms of self-efficacy at 3 months post-birth (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.23, P=0.666). There were no statistically significant differences in the TOPSE scores for the in-app data, in terms of passive use of the app between high and low app users (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.21 to 3.12, P=0.766), nor in terms of active use (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.86, P=0.283).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is one of few, to date, that has investigated the effectiveness of a pregnancy and early parenthood app. No evidence for the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app was found. New technologies can enhance traditional healthcare services and empower users to take more control over their healthcare but app effectiveness needs to be assessed. Further work is needed to consider: (I) how we can best use this new technology to deliver better health outcomes for health service users and, (II) methodological issues of evaluating digital health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"5 ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bumps and BaBies Longitudinal Study (BaBBLeS): a multi-site cohort study of first-time mothers to evaluate the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app.\",\"authors\":\"Toity Deave,&nbsp;Samuel Ginja,&nbsp;Trudy Goodenough,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bailey,&nbsp;Lukasz Piwek,&nbsp;Jane Coad,&nbsp;Crispin Day,&nbsp;Samantha Nightingale,&nbsp;Sally Kendall,&nbsp;Raghu Lingam\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health mobile applications (apps) have become very popular, including apps specifically designed to support women during the ante- and post-natal periods. However, there is currently limited evidence for the effectiveness of such apps at improving pregnancy and parenting outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a pregnancy and parenting app, Baby Buddy, in improving maternal self-efficacy at 3 months post-birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 16 years old or over, first-time mothers, 12-16 weeks gestation, recruited by midwives from five English study sites. The Tool to Measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE) (primary outcome) was used to compare mothers at 3 months post-birth who had downloaded the Baby Buddy app with those who had not downloaded the app, controlling for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eighty-eight participants provided valid data at baseline (12-16 weeks gestation), 296 participants provided valid data at 3 months post-birth, 114 (38.5%) of whom reported that they had used the Baby Buddy app. Baby Buddy app users were more likely to use pregnancy or parenting apps (80.7% <i>vs</i>. 69.6%, P=0.035), more likely to have been introduced to the app by a healthcare professional (P=0.005) and have a lower median score for perceived social support (81 <i>vs</i>. 83, P=0.034) than non-app users. The Baby Buddy app did not elicit a statistically significant change in TOPSE scores from baseline to 3 months post-birth [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 2.13, P=0.730]. Finding out about the Baby Buddy app from a healthcare professional appeared to grant no additional benefit to app users compared to all other participants in terms of self-efficacy at 3 months post-birth (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.23, P=0.666). There were no statistically significant differences in the TOPSE scores for the in-app data, in terms of passive use of the app between high and low app users (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.21 to 3.12, P=0.766), nor in terms of active use (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.86, P=0.283).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is one of few, to date, that has investigated the effectiveness of a pregnancy and early parenthood app. No evidence for the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app was found. New technologies can enhance traditional healthcare services and empower users to take more control over their healthcare but app effectiveness needs to be assessed. Further work is needed to consider: (I) how we can best use this new technology to deliver better health outcomes for health service users and, (II) methodological issues of evaluating digital health interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mHealth\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:健康移动应用程序已经变得非常流行,包括专门为产前和产后女性提供支持的应用程序。然而,目前只有有限的证据表明这些应用程序在改善怀孕和育儿结果方面的有效性。本研究旨在评估怀孕和育儿应用程序Baby Buddy在提高产后3个月产妇自我效能方面的有效性。测量育儿自我效能的工具(TOPSE)(主要结果)用于比较出生后3个月下载了Baby Buddy应用程序的母亲和未下载该应用程序的妇女,控制混杂因素。结果:488名参与者在基线(妊娠12-16周)提供了有效数据,296名参与者于出生后3个月提供了有效的数据,其中114人(38.5%)报告他们使用了Baby Buddy应用程序。与非应用程序用户相比,Baby Buddy应用程序用户更有可能使用怀孕或育儿应用程序(80.7%对69.6%,P=0.035),更有可能由医疗专业人员介绍使用该应用程序(P=0.005),感知社会支持的中位得分较低(81对83,P=0.034)。从基线到出生后3个月,Baby Buddy应用程序的TOPSE得分没有发生统计学上的显著变化[调整后的比值比(OR)1.12,95%置信区间(CI):0.59至2.13,P=0.730]出生后几个月(调整后OR 1.16,95%CI:0.60-2.23,P=0.666)。应用内数据的TOPSE得分,在应用程序的被动使用方面,高应用程序用户和低应用程序用户之间没有统计学上的显著差异(调整后OR0.82,95%CI:0.21至3.12,P=0.766),在主动使用方面也没有统计学上显著差异(校正后OR 0.47,95%CI:0.12至1.86,P=0.283)。结论:这项研究是为数不多的研究之一,到目前为止,该公司已经调查了一款怀孕和早育应用程序的有效性。没有发现任何证据表明Baby Buddy应用程序的有效性。新技术可以增强传统的医疗保健服务,让用户能够更好地控制自己的医疗保健,但应用程序的有效性需要评估。需要进一步的工作来考虑:(I)我们如何最好地利用这项新技术为卫生服务用户提供更好的健康结果,以及(II)评估数字卫生干预措施的方法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Bumps and BaBies Longitudinal Study (BaBBLeS): a multi-site cohort study of first-time mothers to evaluate the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app.

Background: Health mobile applications (apps) have become very popular, including apps specifically designed to support women during the ante- and post-natal periods. However, there is currently limited evidence for the effectiveness of such apps at improving pregnancy and parenting outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a pregnancy and parenting app, Baby Buddy, in improving maternal self-efficacy at 3 months post-birth.

Methods: Participants were 16 years old or over, first-time mothers, 12-16 weeks gestation, recruited by midwives from five English study sites. The Tool to Measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE) (primary outcome) was used to compare mothers at 3 months post-birth who had downloaded the Baby Buddy app with those who had not downloaded the app, controlling for confounding factors.

Results: Four hundred and eighty-eight participants provided valid data at baseline (12-16 weeks gestation), 296 participants provided valid data at 3 months post-birth, 114 (38.5%) of whom reported that they had used the Baby Buddy app. Baby Buddy app users were more likely to use pregnancy or parenting apps (80.7% vs. 69.6%, P=0.035), more likely to have been introduced to the app by a healthcare professional (P=0.005) and have a lower median score for perceived social support (81 vs. 83, P=0.034) than non-app users. The Baby Buddy app did not elicit a statistically significant change in TOPSE scores from baseline to 3 months post-birth [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 2.13, P=0.730]. Finding out about the Baby Buddy app from a healthcare professional appeared to grant no additional benefit to app users compared to all other participants in terms of self-efficacy at 3 months post-birth (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.23, P=0.666). There were no statistically significant differences in the TOPSE scores for the in-app data, in terms of passive use of the app between high and low app users (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.21 to 3.12, P=0.766), nor in terms of active use (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.86, P=0.283).

Conclusions: This study is one of few, to date, that has investigated the effectiveness of a pregnancy and early parenthood app. No evidence for the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app was found. New technologies can enhance traditional healthcare services and empower users to take more control over their healthcare but app effectiveness needs to be assessed. Further work is needed to consider: (I) how we can best use this new technology to deliver better health outcomes for health service users and, (II) methodological issues of evaluating digital health interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring online health resources and self-care among irritable bowel syndrome patients: analyzing internet use and AI chatbot interactions. Not just a Barbie in hijab: participant perspectives on culturally tailoring a virtual health assistant for Bangladeshi immigrants in the US promoting colorectal cancer screening. Development, usability, and preliminary efficacy of a virtual reality experience to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors in children: pilot randomized controlled trial. Telehealth adoption for substance use and mental health disorders in Minnesota and North Dakota: a quasi-experimental study. Feasibility and reliability to assess the motor development of infants exposed to gestational COVID-19 using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale remotely.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1