重症姑息治疗患者的家庭应急小组:可行性和有效性。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2023-004385
Nicolas Deniau, Taraneh Shojaei, Alexandre Georges, Jean Danis, Georges Czapiuk, Stephane Mercier, Claudine Maari, Sylvain Pourchet, Elisabeth Balladur, Clement Leclaire
{"title":"重症姑息治疗患者的家庭应急小组:可行性和有效性。","authors":"Nicolas Deniau, Taraneh Shojaei, Alexandre Georges, Jean Danis, Georges Czapiuk, Stephane Mercier, Claudine Maari, Sylvain Pourchet, Elisabeth Balladur, Clement Leclaire","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-004385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterise trajectories associated with a new team organisation combining critical care and palliative care approaches at home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the pattern of an emergency response team 24/7 directed to patients with advanced illness presenting a distressing symptom at home, who wanted to stay at home and for whom hospitalisation was considered inappropriate by a shared medical decision-making process in an emergency situation. To assess preliminary impact of this Programme, we conducted a descriptive study on all consecutive patients receiving this intervention during the first year (between 6 September 2021 and 5 September 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 352 patients included, main advanced illnesses were cancer (41%), dementia (28%) or chronic organ failure (10%). They were critically ill with acute failures: respiratory (52%), neurological (48%) or circulatory (20%). Main distressing symptoms were breathlessness (43%) and pain (17%). Median response time from call to home-visit (IQR) was 140 (90-265) min. Median length of follow-up (IQR) was 4 (2-7) days. Main outcomes were death at home (72%), improvement (19%) or hospitalisation (9%) including three visits to emergency department (1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study supports that shared decision-making process and urgent care at home are feasible and might prevent undesired hospitalisations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11103340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home emergency response team for the seriously ill palliative care patient: feasibility and effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Deniau, Taraneh Shojaei, Alexandre Georges, Jean Danis, Georges Czapiuk, Stephane Mercier, Claudine Maari, Sylvain Pourchet, Elisabeth Balladur, Clement Leclaire\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2023-004385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterise trajectories associated with a new team organisation combining critical care and palliative care approaches at home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the pattern of an emergency response team 24/7 directed to patients with advanced illness presenting a distressing symptom at home, who wanted to stay at home and for whom hospitalisation was considered inappropriate by a shared medical decision-making process in an emergency situation. To assess preliminary impact of this Programme, we conducted a descriptive study on all consecutive patients receiving this intervention during the first year (between 6 September 2021 and 5 September 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 352 patients included, main advanced illnesses were cancer (41%), dementia (28%) or chronic organ failure (10%). They were critically ill with acute failures: respiratory (52%), neurological (48%) or circulatory (20%). Main distressing symptoms were breathlessness (43%) and pain (17%). Median response time from call to home-visit (IQR) was 140 (90-265) min. Median length of follow-up (IQR) was 4 (2-7) days. Main outcomes were death at home (72%), improvement (19%) or hospitalisation (9%) including three visits to emergency department (1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study supports that shared decision-making process and urgent care at home are feasible and might prevent undesired hospitalisations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11103340/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述与一个新的团队组织相关的轨迹,该组织将家庭重症监护和姑息治疗方法相结合。方法:我们描述了一个应急小组的模式,该小组全天候针对在家中出现痛苦症状的晚期疾病患者,他们想呆在家里,并且在紧急情况下,共享的医疗决策过程认为住院不合适。为了评估该计划的初步影响,我们对第一年(2021年9月6日至2022年9月5日)接受该干预的所有连续患者进行了描述性研究。结果:在352名患者中,主要的晚期疾病是癌症(41%)、痴呆症(28%)或慢性器官衰竭(10%)。他们病情危重,伴有急性衰竭:呼吸系统衰竭(52%)、神经系统衰竭(48%)或循环系统衰竭(20%)。主要的痛苦症状是呼吸困难(43%)和疼痛(17%)。从电话到家访(IQR)的中位响应时间为140(90-265)分钟。中位随访时间为4(2-7)天。主要结果是在家中死亡(72%)、好转(19%)或住院(9%),包括三次去急诊科就诊(1%)。结论:我们的研究支持共享决策过程和在家紧急护理是可行的,可以防止意外住院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Home emergency response team for the seriously ill palliative care patient: feasibility and effectiveness.

Objectives: To characterise trajectories associated with a new team organisation combining critical care and palliative care approaches at home.

Methods: We describe the pattern of an emergency response team 24/7 directed to patients with advanced illness presenting a distressing symptom at home, who wanted to stay at home and for whom hospitalisation was considered inappropriate by a shared medical decision-making process in an emergency situation. To assess preliminary impact of this Programme, we conducted a descriptive study on all consecutive patients receiving this intervention during the first year (between 6 September 2021 and 5 September 2022).

Results: Among the 352 patients included, main advanced illnesses were cancer (41%), dementia (28%) or chronic organ failure (10%). They were critically ill with acute failures: respiratory (52%), neurological (48%) or circulatory (20%). Main distressing symptoms were breathlessness (43%) and pain (17%). Median response time from call to home-visit (IQR) was 140 (90-265) min. Median length of follow-up (IQR) was 4 (2-7) days. Main outcomes were death at home (72%), improvement (19%) or hospitalisation (9%) including three visits to emergency department (1%).

Conclusions: Our study supports that shared decision-making process and urgent care at home are feasible and might prevent undesired hospitalisations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Physical and emotional status, quality of life and activities of daily living in terminal cancer: prospective cohort study. Digital health for cancer symptom management in palliative medicine: systematic review. Tongue pressure, respiratory muscle and limb strength and functional exercise capacity in oesophageal cancer. End-of-life preferences of people with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Spiritual assessment in palliative care: multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1