椎间孔狭窄导致L5神经根病的无融合根治性减压。

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-22 Epub Date: 2023-09-19 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-62
Kohei Takahashi, Ajay Yadav, Takumi Tsubakino, Takeshi Hoshikawa, Tomowaki Nakagawa, Ko Hashimoto, Manabu Suzuki, Toshimi Aizawa, Yasuhisa Tanaka
{"title":"椎间孔狭窄导致L5神经根病的无融合根治性减压。","authors":"Kohei Takahashi, Ajay Yadav, Takumi Tsubakino, Takeshi Hoshikawa, Tomowaki Nakagawa, Ko Hashimoto, Manabu Suzuki, Toshimi Aizawa, Yasuhisa Tanaka","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highest incidence of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs in the L5-S1 segment and its anatomical features differ from those of other segments. Few previous reports have exhaustively assessed surgical outcomes after decompression surgery, limiting the materials to patients with LFS at the L5-S1 segment. We aimed to prospectively investigate instability and neurological improvement following our novel surgical technique for LFS at L5-S1, named \"radical decompression\" of the nerve root.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 who underwent surgery using our technique were prospectively evaluated two years postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and two years postoperatively. The following radiological parameters at L5-S1 were measured: lateral translation, sagittal translation, the difference in sagittal translation (DST) between flexion and extension, disc wedging angle, lordotic angle, the difference in lordotic angle (DLA) between flexion and extension, and disc height. Pre- and postoperative data were compared using paired <i>t</i>-tests. In addition, the patients were classified into a disc group (Group D) and a non-disc group (Group ND) according to whether a discectomy was performed intraoperatively. Changes in each parameter before and after surgery were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were included in this analysis. The JOA scores improved in all patients. The mean preoperative and two-year postoperative JOA scores were 14.5±3.2 (range, 8-21) and 24.3±3.3 (range, 18-29), respectively (P<0.01). All JOABPEQ categories improved two years postoperatively (P<0.05). None of the patients underwent revision surgery. No significant changes were observed in any of the radiological parameters. No significant differences in the changes in each parameter before and after surgery were found between groups D and ND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our surgical technique resulted in good neurological recovery and was associated with a low risk of postoperative segmental instability, regardless of additional discectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"278-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/18/jss-09-03-278.PMC10570647.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical decompression without fusion for L5 radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Kohei Takahashi, Ajay Yadav, Takumi Tsubakino, Takeshi Hoshikawa, Tomowaki Nakagawa, Ko Hashimoto, Manabu Suzuki, Toshimi Aizawa, Yasuhisa Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-23-62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highest incidence of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs in the L5-S1 segment and its anatomical features differ from those of other segments. Few previous reports have exhaustively assessed surgical outcomes after decompression surgery, limiting the materials to patients with LFS at the L5-S1 segment. We aimed to prospectively investigate instability and neurological improvement following our novel surgical technique for LFS at L5-S1, named \\\"radical decompression\\\" of the nerve root.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 who underwent surgery using our technique were prospectively evaluated two years postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and two years postoperatively. The following radiological parameters at L5-S1 were measured: lateral translation, sagittal translation, the difference in sagittal translation (DST) between flexion and extension, disc wedging angle, lordotic angle, the difference in lordotic angle (DLA) between flexion and extension, and disc height. Pre- and postoperative data were compared using paired <i>t</i>-tests. In addition, the patients were classified into a disc group (Group D) and a non-disc group (Group ND) according to whether a discectomy was performed intraoperatively. Changes in each parameter before and after surgery were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were included in this analysis. The JOA scores improved in all patients. The mean preoperative and two-year postoperative JOA scores were 14.5±3.2 (range, 8-21) and 24.3±3.3 (range, 18-29), respectively (P<0.01). All JOABPEQ categories improved two years postoperatively (P<0.05). None of the patients underwent revision surgery. No significant changes were observed in any of the radiological parameters. No significant differences in the changes in each parameter before and after surgery were found between groups D and ND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our surgical technique resulted in good neurological recovery and was associated with a low risk of postoperative segmental instability, regardless of additional discectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"278-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/18/jss-09-03-278.PMC10570647.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰椎椎间孔狭窄(LFS)发生率最高的是L5-S1节段,其解剖特征与其他节段不同。以前很少有报道对减压手术后的手术结果进行详尽评估,仅限于L5-S1段LFS患者。我们的目的是前瞻性地研究L5-S1 LFS的新手术技术后的不稳定性和神经系统改善,该技术被称为神经根的“根治性减压”。方法:对使用我们的技术进行手术的L5-S1椎间孔狭窄患者在术后两年进行前瞻性评估。术前和术后两年评估日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和JOA背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)。测量L5-S1的以下放射学参数:横向平移、矢状平移、屈曲和伸展之间的矢状平移差(DST)、椎间盘楔入角、前凸角、屈曲和拉伸之间的前凸角差(DLA)以及椎间盘高度。使用配对t检验比较术前和术后数据。此外,根据是否在手术中进行椎间盘切除术,将患者分为椎间盘组(D组)和非椎间盘组。比较两组手术前后各参数的变化。结果:28名患者被纳入本分析。所有患者的JOA评分均有改善。术前和术后两年的平均JOA评分分别为14.5±3.2(范围8-21)和24.3±3.3(范围18-29)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radical decompression without fusion for L5 radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis.

Background: The highest incidence of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs in the L5-S1 segment and its anatomical features differ from those of other segments. Few previous reports have exhaustively assessed surgical outcomes after decompression surgery, limiting the materials to patients with LFS at the L5-S1 segment. We aimed to prospectively investigate instability and neurological improvement following our novel surgical technique for LFS at L5-S1, named "radical decompression" of the nerve root.

Methods: Patients with foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 who underwent surgery using our technique were prospectively evaluated two years postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were evaluated preoperatively and two years postoperatively. The following radiological parameters at L5-S1 were measured: lateral translation, sagittal translation, the difference in sagittal translation (DST) between flexion and extension, disc wedging angle, lordotic angle, the difference in lordotic angle (DLA) between flexion and extension, and disc height. Pre- and postoperative data were compared using paired t-tests. In addition, the patients were classified into a disc group (Group D) and a non-disc group (Group ND) according to whether a discectomy was performed intraoperatively. Changes in each parameter before and after surgery were compared between the groups.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in this analysis. The JOA scores improved in all patients. The mean preoperative and two-year postoperative JOA scores were 14.5±3.2 (range, 8-21) and 24.3±3.3 (range, 18-29), respectively (P<0.01). All JOABPEQ categories improved two years postoperatively (P<0.05). None of the patients underwent revision surgery. No significant changes were observed in any of the radiological parameters. No significant differences in the changes in each parameter before and after surgery were found between groups D and ND.

Conclusions: Our surgical technique resulted in good neurological recovery and was associated with a low risk of postoperative segmental instability, regardless of additional discectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1