Lena Barczyk, Kate Kuntu-Blankson, Pierluigi Calanca, Johan Six, Christof Ammann
{"title":"牛尿N2O排放因子:斑块特征和环境驱动因素的影响。","authors":"Lena Barczyk, Kate Kuntu-Blankson, Pierluigi Calanca, Johan Six, Christof Ammann","doi":"10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urine patches from grazing cattle are hotspots of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions. The default IPCC emission factor for urine patches (EF<sub>urine</sub>) is 0.77% for wet climates and 0.32% for dry climates. However, literature reports a considerable range of cattle urine EF values and urine characteristics used in experimental studies, revealing contrary results on the effects of urine patch characteristics and seasonal pattern. Therefore, we examined N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and corresponding EF<sub>urine</sub> values in relation to urine patch characteristics (urine N concentration, urine volume, patch area, urine composition) and environmental drivers (precipitation, water filled pore space, soil temperature). Ten artificial urine application experiments were performed from July 2020 to June 2022 on a pasture located in Eastern Switzerland. Urine N concentration, patch area, volume and urine N composition showed no significant effects on the EF<sub>urine</sub> value (p > 0.05). EF<sub>urine</sub> varied, however, strongly over time (0.17-2.05%). A large part of the variation could be predicted either by cumulative precipitation 20 days after urine application using a second order polynomial model (Adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60) or average WFPS 30 days after urine application using a linear model (Adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45). The derived precipitation model was used to simulate EF<sub>urine</sub> weekly over the last 20 years showing no significant differences between the seasons of a year. The resulting overall average EF<sub>urine</sub> was 0.67%. More field studies are needed across sites/regions differing in climate and soil properties to implement a country-specific EF<sub>3</sub> for Switzerland and to improve the quantification of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions at the national scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":19336,"journal":{"name":"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems","volume":"127 2","pages":"173-189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Barczyk, Kate Kuntu-Blankson, Pierluigi Calanca, Johan Six, Christof Ammann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urine patches from grazing cattle are hotspots of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions. The default IPCC emission factor for urine patches (EF<sub>urine</sub>) is 0.77% for wet climates and 0.32% for dry climates. However, literature reports a considerable range of cattle urine EF values and urine characteristics used in experimental studies, revealing contrary results on the effects of urine patch characteristics and seasonal pattern. Therefore, we examined N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and corresponding EF<sub>urine</sub> values in relation to urine patch characteristics (urine N concentration, urine volume, patch area, urine composition) and environmental drivers (precipitation, water filled pore space, soil temperature). Ten artificial urine application experiments were performed from July 2020 to June 2022 on a pasture located in Eastern Switzerland. Urine N concentration, patch area, volume and urine N composition showed no significant effects on the EF<sub>urine</sub> value (p > 0.05). EF<sub>urine</sub> varied, however, strongly over time (0.17-2.05%). A large part of the variation could be predicted either by cumulative precipitation 20 days after urine application using a second order polynomial model (Adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60) or average WFPS 30 days after urine application using a linear model (Adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45). The derived precipitation model was used to simulate EF<sub>urine</sub> weekly over the last 20 years showing no significant differences between the seasons of a year. The resulting overall average EF<sub>urine</sub> was 0.67%. More field studies are needed across sites/regions differing in climate and soil properties to implement a country-specific EF<sub>3</sub> for Switzerland and to improve the quantification of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions at the national scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems\",\"volume\":\"127 2\",\"pages\":\"173-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10290-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
N2O emission factors for cattle urine: effect of patch characteristics and environmental drivers.
Urine patches from grazing cattle are hotspots of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The default IPCC emission factor for urine patches (EFurine) is 0.77% for wet climates and 0.32% for dry climates. However, literature reports a considerable range of cattle urine EF values and urine characteristics used in experimental studies, revealing contrary results on the effects of urine patch characteristics and seasonal pattern. Therefore, we examined N2O emissions and corresponding EFurine values in relation to urine patch characteristics (urine N concentration, urine volume, patch area, urine composition) and environmental drivers (precipitation, water filled pore space, soil temperature). Ten artificial urine application experiments were performed from July 2020 to June 2022 on a pasture located in Eastern Switzerland. Urine N concentration, patch area, volume and urine N composition showed no significant effects on the EFurine value (p > 0.05). EFurine varied, however, strongly over time (0.17-2.05%). A large part of the variation could be predicted either by cumulative precipitation 20 days after urine application using a second order polynomial model (Adj. R2 = 0.60) or average WFPS 30 days after urine application using a linear model (Adj. R2 = 0.45). The derived precipitation model was used to simulate EFurine weekly over the last 20 years showing no significant differences between the seasons of a year. The resulting overall average EFurine was 0.67%. More field studies are needed across sites/regions differing in climate and soil properties to implement a country-specific EF3 for Switzerland and to improve the quantification of N2O emissions at the national scales.
期刊介绍:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems considers manuscripts dealing with all aspects of carbon and nutrient cycling as well as management and examining their effect in ecological, agronomic, environmental and economic terms. Target agroecosystems include field crop, organic agriculture, urban or peri-urban agriculture, horticulture, bioenergy, agroforestry, livestock, pasture, and fallow systems as well as their system components such as plants and the fertility, chemistry, physics or faunal and micro-biology of soils. The scale of observation is the cycles in the soil-plant-animal system on or relevant to a field or watershed level as well as inputs from or losses to the anthroposphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere. Studies should thus consider the wider system in the examination of cycling and fluxes in agroecosystems or their components. These may include typically multi-year field observations, farm gate budgets, watershed studies, life cycle assessments, enterprise and economic analyses, or regional and global modeling. Management objectives may not only include the maximization of food, fiber and fuel production, but also its environmental and economic impact. The results must allow mechanistic conclusions of broad applicability and distinguish itself from empirical results or case studies of merely local or regional importance. If unsure whether a study fits into this scope, please contact the editor with a brief inquiry before manuscript submission.