创建日本仿制药行业质量文化发展评估指标。

Shiho Takahashi, Tetsuhito Takarada, Riho Kitamura, Mayumi Shikano, Shingou Sakurai
{"title":"创建日本仿制药行业质量文化发展评估指标。","authors":"Shiho Takahashi, Tetsuhito Takarada, Riho Kitamura, Mayumi Shikano, Shingou Sakurai","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past few years, there have been several instances of illicit pharmaceutical manufacturing in Japan, and there is a growing awareness of the importance of corporate compliance and pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality controls. One cause of illicit manufacturing is the inadequate development of quality culture. This study focuses on the degree of quality culture development in Japanese pharmaceutical companies manufacturing generic drugs. Because no evaluation index for Japan can visualize the degree of quality culture development in each company, this study sought to establish this index to utilize it as a tool for evaluating the degree of quality culture development that would enable each company to continuously monitor and improve its own. We conducted a questionnaire survey among Japan Generic Medicines Association members to evaluate the degree of their quality culture development. The questionnaire contained 28 questions in five evaluation categories. Potential indicators of quality culture development included \"Employee growth and satisfaction\"; \"Management commitment\"; \"Improvement activities\"; \"Communication\"; and \"Environment, health, and safety.\" We obtained 294 responses from 37 Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) and 61 manufacturing sites. Respondents were classified by roles of management, manager, and nonmanager. The results confirmed the current status of quality culture development efforts, showing that important messages such as the corporate philosophy as communicated by the management is well known, awareness of quality culture development level differs by role, and appropriate resources are not adequately allocated to employees or facilities. Based on the results, use of the index of quality culture development helped to make relative comparisons and visualize the areas to be addressed for quality culture development. This study established and visualized the index for the degree of quality culture development in domestic generic drug manufacturing companies and we hope this indicator becomes a useful tool for evaluating a company's quality culture development level.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"45-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating an Assessment Indicator of Quality Culture Development in the Generic Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Shiho Takahashi, Tetsuhito Takarada, Riho Kitamura, Mayumi Shikano, Shingou Sakurai\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the past few years, there have been several instances of illicit pharmaceutical manufacturing in Japan, and there is a growing awareness of the importance of corporate compliance and pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality controls. One cause of illicit manufacturing is the inadequate development of quality culture. This study focuses on the degree of quality culture development in Japanese pharmaceutical companies manufacturing generic drugs. Because no evaluation index for Japan can visualize the degree of quality culture development in each company, this study sought to establish this index to utilize it as a tool for evaluating the degree of quality culture development that would enable each company to continuously monitor and improve its own. We conducted a questionnaire survey among Japan Generic Medicines Association members to evaluate the degree of their quality culture development. The questionnaire contained 28 questions in five evaluation categories. Potential indicators of quality culture development included \\\"Employee growth and satisfaction\\\"; \\\"Management commitment\\\"; \\\"Improvement activities\\\"; \\\"Communication\\\"; and \\\"Environment, health, and safety.\\\" We obtained 294 responses from 37 Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) and 61 manufacturing sites. Respondents were classified by roles of management, manager, and nonmanager. The results confirmed the current status of quality culture development efforts, showing that important messages such as the corporate philosophy as communicated by the management is well known, awareness of quality culture development level differs by role, and appropriate resources are not adequately allocated to employees or facilities. Based on the results, use of the index of quality culture development helped to make relative comparisons and visualize the areas to be addressed for quality culture development. This study established and visualized the index for the degree of quality culture development in domestic generic drug manufacturing companies and we hope this indicator becomes a useful tool for evaluating a company's quality culture development level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,日本发生了几起非法制药事件,人们越来越意识到企业合规以及制药和质量控制的重要性。非法制造的一个原因是质量文化发展不足。本研究的重点是生产仿制药的日本制药公司的质量文化发展程度。由于没有一个日本的评估指标可以直观地反映每家公司的质量文化发展程度,本研究试图建立该指标,将其作为评估质量文化发展水平的工具,使每家公司能够持续监控和改进自己的质量文化。我们对日本仿制药协会成员进行了问卷调查,以评估他们的质量文化发展程度。调查表包含五个评价类别的28个问题。质量文化发展的潜在指标包括“员工成长和满意度”管理承诺“;”改进活动“;”通信”;以及“环境、健康和安全”我们从37个营销授权持有人(MAH)和61个生产基地获得了294份回复。受访者按管理层、经理和非经理的角色进行分类。结果证实了质量文化发展工作的现状,表明管理层传达的企业理念等重要信息是众所周知的,对质量文化发展水平的认识因角色而异,适当的资源没有充分分配给员工或设施。基于结果,使用质量文化发展指数有助于进行相对比较,并可视化质量文化发展需要解决的领域。本研究建立并可视化了国内仿制药企业质量文化发展程度指标,希望该指标能成为评价企业质量文化建设水平的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating an Assessment Indicator of Quality Culture Development in the Generic Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan.

In the past few years, there have been several instances of illicit pharmaceutical manufacturing in Japan, and there is a growing awareness of the importance of corporate compliance and pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality controls. One cause of illicit manufacturing is the inadequate development of quality culture. This study focuses on the degree of quality culture development in Japanese pharmaceutical companies manufacturing generic drugs. Because no evaluation index for Japan can visualize the degree of quality culture development in each company, this study sought to establish this index to utilize it as a tool for evaluating the degree of quality culture development that would enable each company to continuously monitor and improve its own. We conducted a questionnaire survey among Japan Generic Medicines Association members to evaluate the degree of their quality culture development. The questionnaire contained 28 questions in five evaluation categories. Potential indicators of quality culture development included "Employee growth and satisfaction"; "Management commitment"; "Improvement activities"; "Communication"; and "Environment, health, and safety." We obtained 294 responses from 37 Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) and 61 manufacturing sites. Respondents were classified by roles of management, manager, and nonmanager. The results confirmed the current status of quality culture development efforts, showing that important messages such as the corporate philosophy as communicated by the management is well known, awareness of quality culture development level differs by role, and appropriate resources are not adequately allocated to employees or facilities. Based on the results, use of the index of quality culture development helped to make relative comparisons and visualize the areas to be addressed for quality culture development. This study established and visualized the index for the degree of quality culture development in domestic generic drug manufacturing companies and we hope this indicator becomes a useful tool for evaluating a company's quality culture development level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification. Comparing Container Closure Integrity Test Methods-Performance of Headspace Carbon Dioxide Analysis versus Helium Leakage Using Positive Controls. Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1