新冠肺炎危机期间的比例和墨西哥的疫情管理。

IF 0.9 3区哲学 Q3 ETHICS Developing World Bioethics Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12429

Felicitas Holzer, Ivette M Ortiz Alcántara, Tobias Eichinger, Julian W März

{"title":"新冠肺炎危机期间的比例和墨西哥的疫情管理。","authors":"Felicitas Holzer, Ivette M Ortiz Alcántara, Tobias Eichinger, Julian W März","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mexico's pandemic management and the absence of measures have been harshly criticized as being disproportionate. This paper examines whether the proportionality principle was properly applied to Mexico's COVID-19 response and outlines three reasons against such an endeavor, namely (i) the content of \"proportionate measures\" remained insufficiently well defined, (ii) there were yet fundamental rights conflicts to resolve, and (iii) the situation was moreover characterized by epistemic uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proportionality and Mexico's pandemic management during the COVID-19 crisis.\",\"authors\":\"Felicitas Holzer, Ivette M Ortiz Alcántara, Tobias Eichinger, Julian W März\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dewb.12429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mexico's pandemic management and the absence of measures have been harshly criticized as being disproportionate. This paper examines whether the proportionality principle was properly applied to Mexico's COVID-19 response and outlines three reasons against such an endeavor, namely (i) the content of \\\"proportionate measures\\\" remained insufficiently well defined, (ii) there were yet fundamental rights conflicts to resolve, and (iii) the situation was moreover characterized by epistemic uncertainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developing World Bioethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developing World Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing World Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

墨西哥的疫情管理和缺乏措施被严厉批评为不相称。本文研究了比例原则是否正确适用于墨西哥的新冠肺炎应对措施，并概述了反对这一努力的三个原因，即（i）“比例措施”的内容定义不够明确，（ii）仍有基本权利冲突需要解决，（iii）情况还具有认识上的不确定性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Proportionality and Mexico's pandemic management during the COVID-19 crisis.

Mexico's pandemic management and the absence of measures have been harshly criticized as being disproportionate. This paper examines whether the proportionality principle was properly applied to Mexico's COVID-19 response and outlines three reasons against such an endeavor, namely (i) the content of "proportionate measures" remained insufficiently well defined, (ii) there were yet fundamental rights conflicts to resolve, and (iii) the situation was moreover characterized by epistemic uncertainty.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Developing World Bioethics 医学-医学：伦理

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

4.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Developing World Bioethics provides long needed case studies, teaching materials, news in brief, and legal backgrounds to bioethics scholars and students in developing and developed countries alike. This companion journal to Bioethics also features high-quality peer reviewed original articles. It is edited by well-known bioethicists who are working in developing countries, yet it will also be open to contributions and commentary from developed countries'' authors. Developing World Bioethics is the only journal in the field dedicated exclusively to developing countries'' bioethics issues. The journal is an essential resource for all those concerned about bioethical issues in the developing world. Members of Ethics Committees in developing countries will highly value a special section dedicated to their work.