Logan G Briggs, Nishant Uppal, Björn Langbein, Naeem Bhojani, Martin Kathrins, Quoc-Dien Trinh
{"title":"泌尿外科风险投资,2011年至2021年年中。","authors":"Logan G Briggs, Nishant Uppal, Björn Langbein, Naeem Bhojani, Martin Kathrins, Quoc-Dien Trinh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To characterize venture capital (VC) investments in urology in the past decade that represent promising innovations in early-stage companies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of deals made between VC investors and urologic companies from January 1, 2011, through June 28, 2021, was conducted by using a financial database (PitchBook Platform, PitchBook Data Inc). Data on urologic company and investor names; company information and funding categories (surgical device, therapeutic device, drug discovery/pharmaceutical, and health care technology companies); and deal sizes (in US dollars) and dates were abstracted and aggregated. Descriptive and linear regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urology-related VC funding fluctuated from 2011 through mid-2021, but no substantial change was observed in funding over time. In total, 191 distinct deals were made involving urologic companies, totaling $1.1 billion. The four largest funding categories together accounted for $848 million and comprised therapeutic devices ($373 million), surgical devices ($187 million), drug discovery/pharmaceuticals ($185 million), and health care technology ($102 million). At least $450 million (41% of total investments) was invested in companies developing minimally invasive surgical devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urologic VC investments did not increase in the past decade and were allocated more toward devices than pharmaceuticals or health care technology. Given relative patterns within urology, VC investments may shift toward health care technology and away from pharmaceuticals but remain stable for devices. Further investments in promising technologies may help urologists more effectively manage urologic disease while optimizing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":"30 5","pages":"11659-11667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venture capital investment in urology, 2011 to mid-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Logan G Briggs, Nishant Uppal, Björn Langbein, Naeem Bhojani, Martin Kathrins, Quoc-Dien Trinh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To characterize venture capital (VC) investments in urology in the past decade that represent promising innovations in early-stage companies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of deals made between VC investors and urologic companies from January 1, 2011, through June 28, 2021, was conducted by using a financial database (PitchBook Platform, PitchBook Data Inc). Data on urologic company and investor names; company information and funding categories (surgical device, therapeutic device, drug discovery/pharmaceutical, and health care technology companies); and deal sizes (in US dollars) and dates were abstracted and aggregated. Descriptive and linear regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urology-related VC funding fluctuated from 2011 through mid-2021, but no substantial change was observed in funding over time. In total, 191 distinct deals were made involving urologic companies, totaling $1.1 billion. The four largest funding categories together accounted for $848 million and comprised therapeutic devices ($373 million), surgical devices ($187 million), drug discovery/pharmaceuticals ($185 million), and health care technology ($102 million). At least $450 million (41% of total investments) was invested in companies developing minimally invasive surgical devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urologic VC investments did not increase in the past decade and were allocated more toward devices than pharmaceuticals or health care technology. Given relative patterns within urology, VC investments may shift toward health care technology and away from pharmaceuticals but remain stable for devices. Further investments in promising technologies may help urologists more effectively manage urologic disease while optimizing outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"11659-11667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:描述过去十年在泌尿外科的风险投资,这些投资代表了早期公司有希望的创新。材料和方法:使用财务数据库(PitchBook平台,PitchBook Data Inc)对2011年1月1日至2021年6月28日期间风险投资投资者与泌尿外科公司之间的交易进行回顾性分析。泌尿外科公司和投资者名称的数据;公司信息和资金类别(外科器械、治疗器械、药物发现/制药和医疗保健技术公司);并对交易规模(以美元计)和日期进行了抽象和汇总。进行了描述性和线性回归分析。结果:从2011年到2021年年中,泌尿外科相关风险投资的资金有所波动,但随着时间的推移,没有观察到资金的实质性变化。总共有191笔不同的交易涉及泌尿外科公司,总额为11亿美元。四大资助类别合计8.48亿美元,包括治疗器械(3.73亿美元)、外科器械(1.87亿美元),药物发现/制药(1.85亿美元)和医疗保健技术(1.02亿美元。至少4.5亿美元(占总投资的41%)投资于开发微创手术设备的公司。结论:泌尿外科风险投资在过去十年中没有增加,更多地用于设备,而不是药品或医疗保健技术。考虑到泌尿外科的相对模式,风险投资可能会转向医疗保健技术,而不是制药,但对设备的投资保持稳定。对有前景的技术的进一步投资可能有助于泌尿科医生更有效地管理泌尿系统疾病,同时优化结果。
Venture capital investment in urology, 2011 to mid-2021.
Introduction: To characterize venture capital (VC) investments in urology in the past decade that represent promising innovations in early-stage companies.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of deals made between VC investors and urologic companies from January 1, 2011, through June 28, 2021, was conducted by using a financial database (PitchBook Platform, PitchBook Data Inc). Data on urologic company and investor names; company information and funding categories (surgical device, therapeutic device, drug discovery/pharmaceutical, and health care technology companies); and deal sizes (in US dollars) and dates were abstracted and aggregated. Descriptive and linear regression analyses were conducted.
Results: Urology-related VC funding fluctuated from 2011 through mid-2021, but no substantial change was observed in funding over time. In total, 191 distinct deals were made involving urologic companies, totaling $1.1 billion. The four largest funding categories together accounted for $848 million and comprised therapeutic devices ($373 million), surgical devices ($187 million), drug discovery/pharmaceuticals ($185 million), and health care technology ($102 million). At least $450 million (41% of total investments) was invested in companies developing minimally invasive surgical devices.
Conclusions: Urologic VC investments did not increase in the past decade and were allocated more toward devices than pharmaceuticals or health care technology. Given relative patterns within urology, VC investments may shift toward health care technology and away from pharmaceuticals but remain stable for devices. Further investments in promising technologies may help urologists more effectively manage urologic disease while optimizing outcomes.