模拟MRI伪影:测试机器学习故障模式。

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL BME frontiers Pub Date : 2022-11-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.34133/2022/9807590
Nicholas C Wang, Douglas C Noll, Ashok Srinivasan, Johann Gagnon-Bartsch, Michelle M Kim, Arvind Rao
{"title":"模拟MRI伪影:测试机器学习故障模式。","authors":"Nicholas C Wang, Douglas C Noll, Ashok Srinivasan, Johann Gagnon-Bartsch, Michelle M Kim, Arvind Rao","doi":"10.34133/2022/9807590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Seven types of MRI artifacts, including acquisition and preprocessing errors, were simulated to test a machine learning brain tumor segmentation model for potential failure modes. <i>Introduction</i>. Real-world medical deployments of machine learning algorithms are less common than the number of medical research papers using machine learning. Part of the gap between the performance of models in research and deployment comes from a lack of hard test cases in the data used to train a model. <i>Methods</i>. These failure modes were simulated for a pretrained brain tumor segmentation model that utilizes standard MRI and used to evaluate the performance of the model under duress. These simulated MRI artifacts consisted of motion, susceptibility induced signal loss, aliasing, field inhomogeneity, sequence mislabeling, sequence misalignment, and skull stripping failures. <i>Results</i>. The artifact with the largest effect was the simplest, sequence mislabeling, though motion, field inhomogeneity, and sequence misalignment also caused significant performance decreases. The model was most susceptible to artifacts affecting the FLAIR (fluid attenuation inversion recovery) sequence. <i>Conclusion</i>. Overall, these simulated artifacts could be used to test other brain MRI models, but this approach could be used across medical imaging applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72430,"journal":{"name":"BME frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulated MRI Artifacts: Testing Machine Learning Failure Modes.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas C Wang, Douglas C Noll, Ashok Srinivasan, Johann Gagnon-Bartsch, Michelle M Kim, Arvind Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.34133/2022/9807590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Seven types of MRI artifacts, including acquisition and preprocessing errors, were simulated to test a machine learning brain tumor segmentation model for potential failure modes. <i>Introduction</i>. Real-world medical deployments of machine learning algorithms are less common than the number of medical research papers using machine learning. Part of the gap between the performance of models in research and deployment comes from a lack of hard test cases in the data used to train a model. <i>Methods</i>. These failure modes were simulated for a pretrained brain tumor segmentation model that utilizes standard MRI and used to evaluate the performance of the model under duress. These simulated MRI artifacts consisted of motion, susceptibility induced signal loss, aliasing, field inhomogeneity, sequence mislabeling, sequence misalignment, and skull stripping failures. <i>Results</i>. The artifact with the largest effect was the simplest, sequence mislabeling, though motion, field inhomogeneity, and sequence misalignment also caused significant performance decreases. The model was most susceptible to artifacts affecting the FLAIR (fluid attenuation inversion recovery) sequence. <i>Conclusion</i>. Overall, these simulated artifacts could be used to test other brain MRI models, but this approach could be used across medical imaging applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BME frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BME frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9807590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BME frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9807590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观的模拟了七种类型的MRI伪影,包括采集和预处理错误,以测试机器学习脑肿瘤分割模型的潜在失败模式。介绍与使用机器学习的医学研究论文数量相比,机器学习算法的真实医学部署并不常见。模型在研究和部署中的性能之间的部分差距来自于用于训练模型的数据中缺乏硬测试用例。方法。这些失败模式是为使用标准MRI的预训练的脑肿瘤分割模型模拟的,并用于评估模型在胁迫下的性能。这些模拟的MRI伪影包括运动、磁化率引起的信号丢失、混叠、场不均匀性、序列错误标记、序列错位和颅骨剥离失败。后果影响最大的伪影是最简单的序列错误标记,尽管运动、场不均匀性和序列错位也会导致性能显著下降。该模型最容易受到影响FLAIR(流体衰减反演恢复)序列的伪影的影响。结论总的来说,这些模拟伪影可以用于测试其他大脑MRI模型,但这种方法可以在医学成像应用中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulated MRI Artifacts: Testing Machine Learning Failure Modes.

Objective. Seven types of MRI artifacts, including acquisition and preprocessing errors, were simulated to test a machine learning brain tumor segmentation model for potential failure modes. Introduction. Real-world medical deployments of machine learning algorithms are less common than the number of medical research papers using machine learning. Part of the gap between the performance of models in research and deployment comes from a lack of hard test cases in the data used to train a model. Methods. These failure modes were simulated for a pretrained brain tumor segmentation model that utilizes standard MRI and used to evaluate the performance of the model under duress. These simulated MRI artifacts consisted of motion, susceptibility induced signal loss, aliasing, field inhomogeneity, sequence mislabeling, sequence misalignment, and skull stripping failures. Results. The artifact with the largest effect was the simplest, sequence mislabeling, though motion, field inhomogeneity, and sequence misalignment also caused significant performance decreases. The model was most susceptible to artifacts affecting the FLAIR (fluid attenuation inversion recovery) sequence. Conclusion. Overall, these simulated artifacts could be used to test other brain MRI models, but this approach could be used across medical imaging applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Janus Adhesive Hydrogel with Integrated Attack and Defense for Bacteria Killing and Antifouling. Cationized Decalcified Bone Matrix for Infected Bone Defect Treatment. Functional Neural Networks in Human Brain Organoids. What Is the Magical Cavitation Bubble: A Holistic Perspective to Trigger Advanced Bubbles, Nano-Sonocatalysts, and Cellular Sonosensitizers. Synergistic Assembly of 1DZnO and Anti-CYFRA 21-1: A Physicochemical Approach to Optical Biosensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1