Jinze Du, Andres Morales, Pragya Kosta, Jean-Marie C Bouteiller, Gema Martinez, David Warren, Eduardo Fernandez, Gianluca Lazzi
{"title":"外周神经中电刺激诱导的电流分布随神经损伤程度的不同而显著变化:一项利用卷积神经网络和真实神经模型的计算研究。","authors":"Jinze Du, Andres Morales, Pragya Kosta, Jean-Marie C Bouteiller, Gema Martinez, David Warren, Eduardo Fernandez, Gianluca Lazzi","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-06242-1_52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although electrical stimulation is an established treatment option for multiple central nervous and peripheral nervous system diseases, its effects on the tissue and subsequent safety of the stimulation are not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial to design stimulation protocols that maximize therapeutic efficacy while avoiding any potential tissue damage. Further, the stimulation levels need to be adjusted regularly to ensure that they are safe even with the changes to the nerve due to long-term stimulation. Using the latest advances in computing capabilities and machine learning approaches, we developed computational models of peripheral nerve stimulation based on very high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves. We generated nerve models constructed from non-stimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to examine how the current density distribution is affected by nerve damage. Using our in-house numerical solver, the Admittance Method (AM), we computed the induced current distribution inside the nerves and compared the current penetration for healthy and damaged nerves. Our computational results indicate that when the nerve is damaged, primarily evidenced by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper inside the nerve than in the healthy case. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of biological tissue are still debated, we ultimately aim to utilize our computational models to determine refined safety criteria and help design safer and more efficacious electrical stimulation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":73496,"journal":{"name":"International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation","volume":"13258 ","pages":"526-535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578432/pdf/nihms-1934877.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrical Stimulation Induced Current Distribution in Peripheral Nerves Varies Significantly with the Extent of Nerve Damage: A Computational Study Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network and Realistic Nerve Models.\",\"authors\":\"Jinze Du, Andres Morales, Pragya Kosta, Jean-Marie C Bouteiller, Gema Martinez, David Warren, Eduardo Fernandez, Gianluca Lazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-031-06242-1_52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although electrical stimulation is an established treatment option for multiple central nervous and peripheral nervous system diseases, its effects on the tissue and subsequent safety of the stimulation are not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial to design stimulation protocols that maximize therapeutic efficacy while avoiding any potential tissue damage. Further, the stimulation levels need to be adjusted regularly to ensure that they are safe even with the changes to the nerve due to long-term stimulation. Using the latest advances in computing capabilities and machine learning approaches, we developed computational models of peripheral nerve stimulation based on very high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves. We generated nerve models constructed from non-stimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to examine how the current density distribution is affected by nerve damage. Using our in-house numerical solver, the Admittance Method (AM), we computed the induced current distribution inside the nerves and compared the current penetration for healthy and damaged nerves. Our computational results indicate that when the nerve is damaged, primarily evidenced by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper inside the nerve than in the healthy case. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of biological tissue are still debated, we ultimately aim to utilize our computational models to determine refined safety criteria and help design safer and more efficacious electrical stimulation protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation\",\"volume\":\"13258 \",\"pages\":\"526-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578432/pdf/nihms-1934877.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06242-1_52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06242-1_52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrical Stimulation Induced Current Distribution in Peripheral Nerves Varies Significantly with the Extent of Nerve Damage: A Computational Study Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network and Realistic Nerve Models.
Although electrical stimulation is an established treatment option for multiple central nervous and peripheral nervous system diseases, its effects on the tissue and subsequent safety of the stimulation are not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial to design stimulation protocols that maximize therapeutic efficacy while avoiding any potential tissue damage. Further, the stimulation levels need to be adjusted regularly to ensure that they are safe even with the changes to the nerve due to long-term stimulation. Using the latest advances in computing capabilities and machine learning approaches, we developed computational models of peripheral nerve stimulation based on very high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves. We generated nerve models constructed from non-stimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to examine how the current density distribution is affected by nerve damage. Using our in-house numerical solver, the Admittance Method (AM), we computed the induced current distribution inside the nerves and compared the current penetration for healthy and damaged nerves. Our computational results indicate that when the nerve is damaged, primarily evidenced by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper inside the nerve than in the healthy case. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of biological tissue are still debated, we ultimately aim to utilize our computational models to determine refined safety criteria and help design safer and more efficacious electrical stimulation protocols.