两种可压二硅酸锂微晶玻璃材料的微观结构、半透明参数和断裂韧性的研究。

Piya-Orn Suttipongkiat, Montri Ratanajanchai, Kallaya Suputtamongkol
{"title":"两种可压二硅酸锂微晶玻璃材料的微观结构、半透明参数和断裂韧性的研究。","authors":"Piya-Orn Suttipongkiat, Montri Ratanajanchai, Kallaya Suputtamongkol","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the microscopic structure and fracture toughness of two pressable glass-ceramics-GC Initial LiSi Press (LiSi) and IPS e.max Press (e.max)-with different levels of translucency.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two groups each of LiSi and e.max, with medium opacity and high translucency levels, were examined. The crystal morphology of acid-etched specimens was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Six specimens in each group were fabricated in a square shape (12 ' 12 ' 1.5 mm) to measure translucency parameters (TP) using a spectrophotometer. Ten bar-shaped specimens in each group with dimensions of 23 x 2 x 4 mm were used to determine the fracture toughness (KIc) by a surface crack in flexure (SCF) using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LiSi showed fine dense crystals 1 to 1.5 μm in size, while e.max showed long rod-shaped crystals 3 to 4 μm in size. The TP values of all specimens coincided with their translucency levels. There was no statistical difference in the KIc between different translucency for both ceramics (P < .05). However, the KIc of e.max was significantly higher than that of LiSi at both translucency levels. As a result of larger and longer crystals, e.max provided better crack deviation mechanism to resist the fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, the translucency levels of both lithium disilicate ceramics did not affect the fracture toughness of the materials. The fracture toughness of e.max was statistically higher than LiSi.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"254-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INVESTIGATION OF MICROSCOPIC STRUCTURE, TRANSLUCENCY PARAMETERS, AND FRACTURE TOUGHNESS OF TWO PRESSABLE LITHIUM DISILICATE GLASS-CERAMIC MATERIALS.\",\"authors\":\"Piya-Orn Suttipongkiat, Montri Ratanajanchai, Kallaya Suputtamongkol\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the microscopic structure and fracture toughness of two pressable glass-ceramics-GC Initial LiSi Press (LiSi) and IPS e.max Press (e.max)-with different levels of translucency.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two groups each of LiSi and e.max, with medium opacity and high translucency levels, were examined. The crystal morphology of acid-etched specimens was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Six specimens in each group were fabricated in a square shape (12 ' 12 ' 1.5 mm) to measure translucency parameters (TP) using a spectrophotometer. Ten bar-shaped specimens in each group with dimensions of 23 x 2 x 4 mm were used to determine the fracture toughness (KIc) by a surface crack in flexure (SCF) using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LiSi showed fine dense crystals 1 to 1.5 μm in size, while e.max showed long rod-shaped crystals 3 to 4 μm in size. The TP values of all specimens coincided with their translucency levels. There was no statistical difference in the KIc between different translucency for both ceramics (P < .05). However, the KIc of e.max was significantly higher than that of LiSi at both translucency levels. As a result of larger and longer crystals, e.max provided better crack deviation mechanism to resist the fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, the translucency levels of both lithium disilicate ceramics did not affect the fracture toughness of the materials. The fracture toughness of e.max was statistically higher than LiSi.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"254-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究两种不同透光度的GC Initial LiSi Press(LiSi)和IPS e.max Press(e.max)可压制微晶玻璃的微观结构和断裂韧性。材料和方法:检测四组中等不透明度和高半透明水平的LiSi和e.max。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察了酸蚀样品的晶体形态。每组6个样品制成正方形(12mm’12mm’1.5mm),用分光光度计测量半透明参数(TP)。使用通用试验机通过弯曲表面裂纹(SCF)测定10个条形试样的断裂韧性(KIc),每组试样的尺寸为23 mm’2 mm’4 mm。采用单因素方差分析和Scheffe事后检验进行统计分析。结果:LiSi显示尺寸为1-1.5µm的精细致密晶体,而e.max显示尺寸为3-4µm的长棒状晶体。所有标本的TP值与其半透明度水平一致。两种陶瓷的不同透光率之间的KIc没有统计学差异(P结论:在本研究的范围内,两种二硅酸锂陶瓷的透光率水平都不影响材料的断裂韧性。e.max的断裂韧性在统计学上高于LiSi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INVESTIGATION OF MICROSCOPIC STRUCTURE, TRANSLUCENCY PARAMETERS, AND FRACTURE TOUGHNESS OF TWO PRESSABLE LITHIUM DISILICATE GLASS-CERAMIC MATERIALS.

Purpose: To investigate the microscopic structure and fracture toughness of two pressable glass-ceramics-GC Initial LiSi Press (LiSi) and IPS e.max Press (e.max)-with different levels of translucency.

Materials and methods: Two groups each of LiSi and e.max, with medium opacity and high translucency levels, were examined. The crystal morphology of acid-etched specimens was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Six specimens in each group were fabricated in a square shape (12 ' 12 ' 1.5 mm) to measure translucency parameters (TP) using a spectrophotometer. Ten bar-shaped specimens in each group with dimensions of 23 x 2 x 4 mm were used to determine the fracture toughness (KIc) by a surface crack in flexure (SCF) using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: LiSi showed fine dense crystals 1 to 1.5 μm in size, while e.max showed long rod-shaped crystals 3 to 4 μm in size. The TP values of all specimens coincided with their translucency levels. There was no statistical difference in the KIc between different translucency for both ceramics (P < .05). However, the KIc of e.max was significantly higher than that of LiSi at both translucency levels. As a result of larger and longer crystals, e.max provided better crack deviation mechanism to resist the fracture.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the translucency levels of both lithium disilicate ceramics did not affect the fracture toughness of the materials. The fracture toughness of e.max was statistically higher than LiSi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Food-Simulating Liquids on Hydrolytic Behavior of Resin Matrix Ceramics. A Pilot Study to Predict Lifetime of Resin-Based Materials for Denture: Presentation of an In Vitro Thermally-Accelerated Ageing Method. In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing. Reference CAD-CAM Samples for Dental Shade Communication for Successful Aesthetic Outcome. An Investigation of Stress Distribution Between Two Different Implant Concept in Implant-Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Different Framework Materials: A Finite Element Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1