需求侧政策:成功与失败的机制

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.PWAR
P. Warren
{"title":"需求侧政策:成功与失败的机制","authors":"P. Warren","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.PWAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demand-side management (DSM) policy evaluations, including energy efficiency and demand response, primarily focus on ex-ante appraisals or ex-post evaluations of impacts, such as energy savings, carbon savings and implementation costs. However, there is a knowledge gap in understanding the mechanisms behind the success and failure of demand-side policies. The paper presents the results of a four-year project to systematically review the global evaluation evidence base in order to identify the key factors for success and failure for different types of DSM policy. The realist synthesis type of systematic review has had limited application in the energy policy field and the research developed a methodological approach to apply it to energy policy analysis. The paper inductively identifies 22 key success factors and 25 key failure factors for twelve types of demand-side policy from a sample of 102 high-quality documents, which cover 690 expost evaluations and 66 countries and sub-national states across six continents.","PeriodicalId":45808,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demand-Side Policy: Mechanisms for Success and Failure\",\"authors\":\"P. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.PWAR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Demand-side management (DSM) policy evaluations, including energy efficiency and demand response, primarily focus on ex-ante appraisals or ex-post evaluations of impacts, such as energy savings, carbon savings and implementation costs. However, there is a knowledge gap in understanding the mechanisms behind the success and failure of demand-side policies. The paper presents the results of a four-year project to systematically review the global evaluation evidence base in order to identify the key factors for success and failure for different types of DSM policy. The realist synthesis type of systematic review has had limited application in the energy policy field and the research developed a methodological approach to apply it to energy policy analysis. The paper inductively identifies 22 key success factors and 25 key failure factors for twelve types of demand-side policy from a sample of 102 high-quality documents, which cover 690 expost evaluations and 66 countries and sub-national states across six continents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.PWAR\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.PWAR","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

需求侧管理(DSM)政策评估,包括能源效率和需求响应,主要侧重于对影响的事前评估或事后评估,如能源节约、碳节约和实施成本。然而,在理解需求侧政策成功与失败背后的机制方面存在知识差距。本文介绍了一个为期四年的项目的结果,该项目系统地审查了全球评估证据库,以确定不同类型的需求侧管理政策成败的关键因素。现实主义综合型系统综述在能源政策领域的应用有限,该研究开发了一种将其应用于能源政策分析的方法论方法。本文从102份高质量文件的样本中归纳出12种需求侧政策的22个关键成功因素和25个关键失败因素,这些文件涵盖了六大洲的690个博览会评估和66个国家和次国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demand-Side Policy: Mechanisms for Success and Failure
Demand-side management (DSM) policy evaluations, including energy efficiency and demand response, primarily focus on ex-ante appraisals or ex-post evaluations of impacts, such as energy savings, carbon savings and implementation costs. However, there is a knowledge gap in understanding the mechanisms behind the success and failure of demand-side policies. The paper presents the results of a four-year project to systematically review the global evaluation evidence base in order to identify the key factors for success and failure for different types of DSM policy. The realist synthesis type of systematic review has had limited application in the energy policy field and the research developed a methodological approach to apply it to energy policy analysis. The paper inductively identifies 22 key success factors and 25 key failure factors for twelve types of demand-side policy from a sample of 102 high-quality documents, which cover 690 expost evaluations and 66 countries and sub-national states across six continents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Energy Network Innovation for Green Transition: Economic Issues and Regulatory Options Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition Socio-technical Inertia: Understanding the Barriers to Distributed Generation in Pakistan Residential Welfare-Loss from Electricity Supply Interruptions in South Africa: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource Subsidy Programs Cost Efficiency Evaluation of Thermal Power Plants in Bangladesh Using a Two-Stage DEA Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1