不稳定量子场论应该是洛伦兹不变量吗?

IF 0.9 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Physica Polonica B Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.5506/APhysPolB.53.11-A4
L. Gavassino
{"title":"不稳定量子场论应该是洛伦兹不变量吗?","authors":"L. Gavassino","doi":"10.5506/APhysPolB.53.11-A4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An unstable field theory is what we obtain when we linearise the equations of an interacting field theory near an unstable state. Theories of this kind are adopted to model the onset of spontaneous symmetry breakings, when the fields are sitting on the top of the Mexican hat, and they start to “roll down” to the bottom. At present, there exists no rigorous proof that unstable quantum field theories are Lorentz-invariant (in the sense of Wigner’s theorem). Here, we show that they shouldn’t be. In fact, unstable theories always have a limited regime of applicability, and they are valid only for a very short time. As consequence, there is a preferred simultaneity hyperplane, along which the unstable theory is everywhere applicable, while a generic observer (whose four-velocity is not orthogonal to such hyperplane) must use the full non-linear theory. In summary: the current quantization schemes are “ok”, independently from whether they lead to a Lorentz-invariant theory.","PeriodicalId":7060,"journal":{"name":"Acta Physica Polonica B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Unstable Quantum Field Theories be Lorentz-invariant?\",\"authors\":\"L. Gavassino\",\"doi\":\"10.5506/APhysPolB.53.11-A4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An unstable field theory is what we obtain when we linearise the equations of an interacting field theory near an unstable state. Theories of this kind are adopted to model the onset of spontaneous symmetry breakings, when the fields are sitting on the top of the Mexican hat, and they start to “roll down” to the bottom. At present, there exists no rigorous proof that unstable quantum field theories are Lorentz-invariant (in the sense of Wigner’s theorem). Here, we show that they shouldn’t be. In fact, unstable theories always have a limited regime of applicability, and they are valid only for a very short time. As consequence, there is a preferred simultaneity hyperplane, along which the unstable theory is everywhere applicable, while a generic observer (whose four-velocity is not orthogonal to such hyperplane) must use the full non-linear theory. In summary: the current quantization schemes are “ok”, independently from whether they lead to a Lorentz-invariant theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Physica Polonica B\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Physica Polonica B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.53.11-A4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Physica Polonica B","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.53.11-A4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们将不稳定状态附近的相互作用场理论的方程线性化时,我们得到了不稳定场理论。这类理论被用来模拟自发对称断裂的发生,当田地坐在墨西哥帽的顶部时,它们开始“向下滚动”到底部。目前,还没有严格的证据证明不稳定量子场理论是洛伦兹不变量(在Wigner定理的意义上)。在这里,我们证明了它们不应该是。事实上,不稳定理论的适用性总是有限的,而且它们只在很短的时间内有效。因此,存在一个优选的同时超平面,沿着该超平面,不稳定理论在任何地方都适用,而一般的观测器(其四个速度不正交于这样的超平面)必须使用全非线性理论。总之:当前的量化方案是“好的”,独立于它们是否导致洛伦兹不变量理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should Unstable Quantum Field Theories be Lorentz-invariant?
An unstable field theory is what we obtain when we linearise the equations of an interacting field theory near an unstable state. Theories of this kind are adopted to model the onset of spontaneous symmetry breakings, when the fields are sitting on the top of the Mexican hat, and they start to “roll down” to the bottom. At present, there exists no rigorous proof that unstable quantum field theories are Lorentz-invariant (in the sense of Wigner’s theorem). Here, we show that they shouldn’t be. In fact, unstable theories always have a limited regime of applicability, and they are valid only for a very short time. As consequence, there is a preferred simultaneity hyperplane, along which the unstable theory is everywhere applicable, while a generic observer (whose four-velocity is not orthogonal to such hyperplane) must use the full non-linear theory. In summary: the current quantization schemes are “ok”, independently from whether they lead to a Lorentz-invariant theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Physica Polonica B
Acta Physica Polonica B 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Physica Polonica B covers the following areas of physics: -General and Mathematical Physics- Particle Physics and Field Theory- Nuclear Physics- Theory of Relativity and Astrophysics- Statistical Physics
期刊最新文献
Particle-theory Input for Neutron-star Physics Perturbative Computation of Thermal Characteristics of the Stoner Phase Transition Topologically Charged Rotating Wormhole The Mass Density Contrast in Perturbed Friedman–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker Cosmologies Wigner and Husimi Partonic Distributions of the Pion in a Chiral Quark Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1