英国脱欧后的苏格兰立法:苏格兰议会对英国保留欧盟法律的法定文书的审查

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Edinburgh Law Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3366/elr.2023.0809
Robert Brett Taylor, Adelyn L M Wilson
{"title":"英国脱欧后的苏格兰立法:苏格兰议会对英国保留欧盟法律的法定文书的审查","authors":"Robert Brett Taylor, Adelyn L M Wilson","doi":"10.3366/elr.2023.0809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK formally left the European Union (EU) on 31 January 2020, and entered a transition period until 31 December 2020 (“IP Completion Day”). Thereafter, EU law was no longer binding on the UK as an international source of law, and was replaced by a domestic equivalent, known as “retained EU law”. One of the questions which arose prior to IP Completion Day was how to correct retained EU law in advance of it taking effect, so that it would operate effectively and avoid a so-called “cliff-edge scenario”. Most of these corrections were made using delegated legislation by the UK Government. This was typically done with the consent of the devolved administrations where retained EU law included policy areas within the devolved competences of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In Scotland, new processes were introduced to provide the Scottish Parliament with an opportunity to approve such consent being given by the Scottish Government. The purpose of this article is to provide new analysis of the impact of this process and its significance for Scots law and Scottish parliamentary scrutiny, as well as to consider the extent to which the challenges observed with that process have been addressed by the successor process which has been in place since IP Completion Day.","PeriodicalId":43268,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Law Review","volume":"141 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislating for a Post-Brexit Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Scrutiny of UK Statutory Instruments on Retained EU Law\",\"authors\":\"Robert Brett Taylor, Adelyn L M Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/elr.2023.0809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The UK formally left the European Union (EU) on 31 January 2020, and entered a transition period until 31 December 2020 (“IP Completion Day”). Thereafter, EU law was no longer binding on the UK as an international source of law, and was replaced by a domestic equivalent, known as “retained EU law”. One of the questions which arose prior to IP Completion Day was how to correct retained EU law in advance of it taking effect, so that it would operate effectively and avoid a so-called “cliff-edge scenario”. Most of these corrections were made using delegated legislation by the UK Government. This was typically done with the consent of the devolved administrations where retained EU law included policy areas within the devolved competences of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In Scotland, new processes were introduced to provide the Scottish Parliament with an opportunity to approve such consent being given by the Scottish Government. The purpose of this article is to provide new analysis of the impact of this process and its significance for Scots law and Scottish parliamentary scrutiny, as well as to consider the extent to which the challenges observed with that process have been addressed by the successor process which has been in place since IP Completion Day.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edinburgh Law Review\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edinburgh Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2023.0809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2023.0809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

英国于2020年1月31日正式脱离欧盟,进入过渡期至2020年12月31日(“知识产权完成日”)。此后,欧盟法律不再作为国际法律来源对英国具有约束力,取而代之的是国内同等法律,即“保留的欧盟法律”。知识产权完成日之前出现的问题之一是,如何在保留的欧盟法律生效之前纠正该法律,使其有效运作,避免所谓的“悬崖边缘场景”。这些更正大多是利用英国政府授权的立法进行的。这通常是在权力下放的行政部门同意的情况下进行的,保留的欧盟法律包括苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰权力下放权限内的政策领域。在苏格兰,引入了新的程序,为苏格兰议会提供了批准苏格兰政府同意的机会。本文的目的是对这一程序的影响及其对苏格兰法律和苏格兰议会审查的意义进行新的分析,并考虑自知识产权完成日以来实施的后续程序在多大程度上解决了这一程序所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legislating for a Post-Brexit Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Scrutiny of UK Statutory Instruments on Retained EU Law
The UK formally left the European Union (EU) on 31 January 2020, and entered a transition period until 31 December 2020 (“IP Completion Day”). Thereafter, EU law was no longer binding on the UK as an international source of law, and was replaced by a domestic equivalent, known as “retained EU law”. One of the questions which arose prior to IP Completion Day was how to correct retained EU law in advance of it taking effect, so that it would operate effectively and avoid a so-called “cliff-edge scenario”. Most of these corrections were made using delegated legislation by the UK Government. This was typically done with the consent of the devolved administrations where retained EU law included policy areas within the devolved competences of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In Scotland, new processes were introduced to provide the Scottish Parliament with an opportunity to approve such consent being given by the Scottish Government. The purpose of this article is to provide new analysis of the impact of this process and its significance for Scots law and Scottish parliamentary scrutiny, as well as to consider the extent to which the challenges observed with that process have been addressed by the successor process which has been in place since IP Completion Day.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
The One Year Time Limit in Cohabitation Claims: Knight v Henderson Front matter Peter Webster, Leasehold Conditions Private Purpose Trusts in Scotland Lorna J MacFarlane, Privity of Contract and its Exceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1