{"title":"从中国农村到常春藤盟校:中国近代史变迁的回忆。作者:Yü yingshih由Josephine Chiu-Duke和Michael S. Duke翻译。阿默斯特,纽约州:坎布里亚出版社,2021年。114.99美元(布);49.99美元(纸)","authors":"Jerry P. Dennerline","doi":"10.1017/jch.2022.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dence,” but are understood both critically and discursively as a part of how a “Kongzhai effect” was created and sustained in the face of (often) indifference and (occasionally) hostility. This is in some ways a record of failure, of things that didn’t happen, plans that didn’t come off (quite literally; some of the most fascinating illustrations are handdrawn plans for unachieved renovation in the 1840s, from the archives of the Confucian headquarters at Qufu). Kongzhai was clearly never as famous, never as prominent, never as loved as its most dedicated supporters felt it should be. Some readers may find themselves calling to mind the poignant chapters in the great Qing novel Ru lin wai shi, itself set in the mid-Ming, which deal with the ultimately unsuccessful attempts of a group of local literati to institute a cult of Tai Bo, legendary founder of the Kingdom of Wu. Despite the grand ceremony narrated in loving detail in chapter 37, by the end of the novel, his temple too is “falling down.” There may perhaps have been many such failed enterprises across the Ming–Qing ritual landscape, reminding us that history is not only written by the winners, it is written about the winners. There are sites of forgetting, as well as lieux de mémoire. Perhaps appropriately, the few surviving material fragments that have survived the wreck of Kongzhai’s fortunes have now been relocated to become embedded in one of the rebuilt “classic gardens” which are a very visible “newly old” (xin jiu) manifestation of a “traditional Chinese culture” in the contemporary urban landscape. This very welcome study shows just how fluid and contingent that “traditional Chinese culture” really was, far from the monolithic and triumphalist presence taken for granted in so much contemporary official discourse, which might have plenty of room for the celebration of Confucius (in his place), but which has, it seems, no place for Kongzhai. In showing us how this situation was arrived at, and the many twists and turns that led there, Julia Murray has provided an outstandingly rich and thought-provoking account, which will be of enduring value.","PeriodicalId":15316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese History","volume":"13 4","pages":"391 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History. By Yü Ying-shih. Translated by Josephine Chiu-Duke and Michael S. Duke. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 2021. $114.99 (cloth); $49.99 (paper)\",\"authors\":\"Jerry P. Dennerline\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jch.2022.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"dence,” but are understood both critically and discursively as a part of how a “Kongzhai effect” was created and sustained in the face of (often) indifference and (occasionally) hostility. This is in some ways a record of failure, of things that didn’t happen, plans that didn’t come off (quite literally; some of the most fascinating illustrations are handdrawn plans for unachieved renovation in the 1840s, from the archives of the Confucian headquarters at Qufu). Kongzhai was clearly never as famous, never as prominent, never as loved as its most dedicated supporters felt it should be. Some readers may find themselves calling to mind the poignant chapters in the great Qing novel Ru lin wai shi, itself set in the mid-Ming, which deal with the ultimately unsuccessful attempts of a group of local literati to institute a cult of Tai Bo, legendary founder of the Kingdom of Wu. Despite the grand ceremony narrated in loving detail in chapter 37, by the end of the novel, his temple too is “falling down.” There may perhaps have been many such failed enterprises across the Ming–Qing ritual landscape, reminding us that history is not only written by the winners, it is written about the winners. There are sites of forgetting, as well as lieux de mémoire. Perhaps appropriately, the few surviving material fragments that have survived the wreck of Kongzhai’s fortunes have now been relocated to become embedded in one of the rebuilt “classic gardens” which are a very visible “newly old” (xin jiu) manifestation of a “traditional Chinese culture” in the contemporary urban landscape. This very welcome study shows just how fluid and contingent that “traditional Chinese culture” really was, far from the monolithic and triumphalist presence taken for granted in so much contemporary official discourse, which might have plenty of room for the celebration of Confucius (in his place), but which has, it seems, no place for Kongzhai. In showing us how this situation was arrived at, and the many twists and turns that led there, Julia Murray has provided an outstandingly rich and thought-provoking account, which will be of enduring value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese History\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"391 - 394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jch.2022.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jch.2022.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
但在批评和讨论中都被理解为“孔寨效应”是如何在(通常)冷漠和(偶尔)敌意面前产生和维持的一部分。在某种程度上,这是一个失败的记录,没有发生的事情,没有实现的计划(确切地说,一些最引人入胜的插图是从曲阜儒家总部的档案中手工绘制的19世纪40年代未实现的翻修计划)。孔寨显然从来没有像它最忠实的支持者所认为的那样出名、突出、受人喜爱。一些读者可能会想起清代小说《儒林外史》中的辛酸章节,这部小说本身就发生在明代中期,讲述了一群当地文人建立对台Bo崇拜的最终失败的尝试,吴的传奇缔造者。尽管第37章讲述了盛大的仪式,但在小说的结尾,他的寺庙也在“倒塌”。在明清礼制景观中,可能有很多这样的失败企业,提醒我们历史不仅仅是由胜利者书写的,它是关于胜利者的。这里有遗忘的地方,也有莫伊拉宫(lieux de mémoire)。也许恰当的是,在孔宅命运的废墟中幸存下来的为数不多的物质碎片现在被重新安置,嵌入重建的“经典花园”中,这是当代城市景观中“中国传统文化”的一种非常明显的“新老”(新酒)表现。这项非常受欢迎的研究表明,“中国传统文化”的流动性和偶然性,与当代许多官方话语中被视为理所当然的铁板一块和必胜主义的存在相去甚远,这些话语可能有很大的空间来庆祝孔子(在他的位置上),但似乎没有孔斋的位置。朱莉娅·默里向我们展示了这种情况是如何发生的,以及导致这种情况的许多曲折,她提供了一个非常丰富和发人深省的叙述,这将具有持久的价值。
From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History. By Yü Ying-shih. Translated by Josephine Chiu-Duke and Michael S. Duke. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 2021. $114.99 (cloth); $49.99 (paper)
dence,” but are understood both critically and discursively as a part of how a “Kongzhai effect” was created and sustained in the face of (often) indifference and (occasionally) hostility. This is in some ways a record of failure, of things that didn’t happen, plans that didn’t come off (quite literally; some of the most fascinating illustrations are handdrawn plans for unachieved renovation in the 1840s, from the archives of the Confucian headquarters at Qufu). Kongzhai was clearly never as famous, never as prominent, never as loved as its most dedicated supporters felt it should be. Some readers may find themselves calling to mind the poignant chapters in the great Qing novel Ru lin wai shi, itself set in the mid-Ming, which deal with the ultimately unsuccessful attempts of a group of local literati to institute a cult of Tai Bo, legendary founder of the Kingdom of Wu. Despite the grand ceremony narrated in loving detail in chapter 37, by the end of the novel, his temple too is “falling down.” There may perhaps have been many such failed enterprises across the Ming–Qing ritual landscape, reminding us that history is not only written by the winners, it is written about the winners. There are sites of forgetting, as well as lieux de mémoire. Perhaps appropriately, the few surviving material fragments that have survived the wreck of Kongzhai’s fortunes have now been relocated to become embedded in one of the rebuilt “classic gardens” which are a very visible “newly old” (xin jiu) manifestation of a “traditional Chinese culture” in the contemporary urban landscape. This very welcome study shows just how fluid and contingent that “traditional Chinese culture” really was, far from the monolithic and triumphalist presence taken for granted in so much contemporary official discourse, which might have plenty of room for the celebration of Confucius (in his place), but which has, it seems, no place for Kongzhai. In showing us how this situation was arrived at, and the many twists and turns that led there, Julia Murray has provided an outstandingly rich and thought-provoking account, which will be of enduring value.