迷你型PCNL与标准型PCNL治疗肾结石的比较

B. Bhandari, B. Thapa, D. Ayer, S. Thapa, S. Bista
{"title":"迷你型PCNL与标准型PCNL治疗肾结石的比较","authors":"B. Bhandari, B. Thapa, D. Ayer, S. Thapa, S. Bista","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.26640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The incidence of small and medium size renal stones is rising. Stone clearance, bleeding, urine leak and infectious complications are major concerns for urologist. Urologist chooses best technique from list of armamentarium available. Minimally invasive approach like Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has significantly influenced the renal stone management since 1976. Miniaturisation of the instruments allow more effective and safer alternatives for urolithasis management. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which the outcome of mini PCNL (mPCNL) was compared with standard PCNL (sPCNL) in management of nephrolithiasis.","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":"40 25","pages":"80-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.26640","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Mini PCNL and Standard PCNL in Management of Nephrolithiasis\",\"authors\":\"B. Bhandari, B. Thapa, D. Ayer, S. Thapa, S. Bista\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.26640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The incidence of small and medium size renal stones is rising. Stone clearance, bleeding, urine leak and infectious complications are major concerns for urologist. Urologist chooses best technique from list of armamentarium available. Minimally invasive approach like Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has significantly influenced the renal stone management since 1976. Miniaturisation of the instruments allow more effective and safer alternatives for urolithasis management. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which the outcome of mini PCNL (mPCNL) was compared with standard PCNL (sPCNL) in management of nephrolithiasis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital\",\"volume\":\"40 25\",\"pages\":\"80-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.26640\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.26640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i2.26640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导言:中小型肾结石的发病率呈上升趋势。结石清除,出血,尿漏和感染并发症是泌尿科医生主要关注的问题。泌尿科医生从现有设备列表中选择最佳技术。自1976年以来,经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)等微创入路对肾结石的治疗产生了重大影响。仪器的小型化为尿石症治疗提供了更有效、更安全的选择。方法:回顾性比较迷你PCNL (mPCNL)与标准PCNL (sPCNL)治疗肾结石的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison Between Mini PCNL and Standard PCNL in Management of Nephrolithiasis
Introduction: The incidence of small and medium size renal stones is rising. Stone clearance, bleeding, urine leak and infectious complications are major concerns for urologist. Urologist chooses best technique from list of armamentarium available. Minimally invasive approach like Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has significantly influenced the renal stone management since 1976. Miniaturisation of the instruments allow more effective and safer alternatives for urolithasis management. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which the outcome of mini PCNL (mPCNL) was compared with standard PCNL (sPCNL) in management of nephrolithiasis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective study to Analyze the Outcomes of Paediatric Pyeloplasty in Poorly Functioning Kidneys Visual Function at High Altitude in Nepal A Case of Hydropyometra Secondary to Vaginal Atresia: A Case Report Endovascular Management of a Rare Case of a True Facial Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report Spectrum of Neurological cases in OPD of Tertiary Paediatric care Center of Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1