巴布亚新几内亚莫罗贝省土壤碳储量建模

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Case Studies in the Environment Pub Date : 2021-02-05 DOI:10.1525/cse.2021.1426687
L. Moripi
{"title":"巴布亚新几内亚莫罗贝省土壤碳储量建模","authors":"L. Moripi","doi":"10.1525/cse.2021.1426687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was done to develop a best fit model for soil carbon distribution to 1-m depth in Papua New Guinea’s Morobe Province using multiple linear regression (MLR) technique on environmental variables elevation, slope, aspect, normalized difference vegetative index, mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) using SPSS and ArcGis 10 software. Descriptive, correlation and MLR analyses were performed, and the data revealed that elevation and MAT were skewed. Slope and elevation were significantly negatively correlated to soil carbon distribution (R = −.725 at p < .05; R = −.862 at p < .01), while MAT was significantly positively correlated to the soil carbon distribution (R = .906 at p < .01). Three models developed from MLR analysis revealed that Model 2 (adjusted R2 = .987 at p < .05) and Model 3 (adjusted R2 = .990 at p < .05) were both significant, hence Model 2 developed Equation (3), whereas Model 3 developed Equation (4). Prediction accuracy of the two equations revealed that Equation (3) (root mean square error [RMSE] = 2.597) performed better than Equation (4) (RMSE = 2.764), hence Equation (3) was the best fit model that developed the predicted map of soil carbon distribution (Model 1 predicted approximately 271 t/ha). This study shows that environmental variables can be used to predict soil carbon distribution. However, the limited number of sites (n = 8) could have greatly affected the model development exercise (e.g., the surprising positive correlation of soil carbon with MAT) and consequently the accuracy of the prediction map.","PeriodicalId":42507,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in the Environment","volume":"62 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Soil Carbon Stocks in Morobe Province, PNG\",\"authors\":\"L. Moripi\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/cse.2021.1426687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was done to develop a best fit model for soil carbon distribution to 1-m depth in Papua New Guinea’s Morobe Province using multiple linear regression (MLR) technique on environmental variables elevation, slope, aspect, normalized difference vegetative index, mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) using SPSS and ArcGis 10 software. Descriptive, correlation and MLR analyses were performed, and the data revealed that elevation and MAT were skewed. Slope and elevation were significantly negatively correlated to soil carbon distribution (R = −.725 at p < .05; R = −.862 at p < .01), while MAT was significantly positively correlated to the soil carbon distribution (R = .906 at p < .01). Three models developed from MLR analysis revealed that Model 2 (adjusted R2 = .987 at p < .05) and Model 3 (adjusted R2 = .990 at p < .05) were both significant, hence Model 2 developed Equation (3), whereas Model 3 developed Equation (4). Prediction accuracy of the two equations revealed that Equation (3) (root mean square error [RMSE] = 2.597) performed better than Equation (4) (RMSE = 2.764), hence Equation (3) was the best fit model that developed the predicted map of soil carbon distribution (Model 1 predicted approximately 271 t/ha). This study shows that environmental variables can be used to predict soil carbon distribution. However, the limited number of sites (n = 8) could have greatly affected the model development exercise (e.g., the surprising positive correlation of soil carbon with MAT) and consequently the accuracy of the prediction map.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in the Environment\",\"volume\":\"62 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2021.1426687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2021.1426687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用SPSS和ArcGis 10软件,对海拔、坡度、坡向、归一化差异植被指数、年平均气温(MAT)和年平均降水量(MAP)等环境变量采用多元线性回归(MLR)技术,建立了巴布亚新几内亚莫罗贝省1m深度土壤碳分布的最佳拟合模型。进行了描述性、相关性和MLR分析,数据显示高程和MAT存在偏差。坡度和海拔与土壤碳分布呈显著负相关(R=−.725,p<.05;R=−.862,p<.01),而MAT与土壤碳分布显著正相关(R=.906,p<0.01)。MLR分析开发的三个模型显示,模型2(调整后的R2=.987,p<0.05)和模型3(调整后R2=.990,p<0.05)都很显著,因此模型2开发了方程(3),而模型3开发了公式(4)。两个方程的预测精度表明,方程(3)(均方根误差[RMSE]=2.597)比方程(4)(均方误差=2.764)表现更好,因此方程(3。这项研究表明,环境变量可以用来预测土壤碳分布。然而,有限的站点数量(n=8)可能会极大地影响模型开发工作(例如,土壤碳与MAT惊人的正相关性),从而影响预测图的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling Soil Carbon Stocks in Morobe Province, PNG
This study was done to develop a best fit model for soil carbon distribution to 1-m depth in Papua New Guinea’s Morobe Province using multiple linear regression (MLR) technique on environmental variables elevation, slope, aspect, normalized difference vegetative index, mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) using SPSS and ArcGis 10 software. Descriptive, correlation and MLR analyses were performed, and the data revealed that elevation and MAT were skewed. Slope and elevation were significantly negatively correlated to soil carbon distribution (R = −.725 at p < .05; R = −.862 at p < .01), while MAT was significantly positively correlated to the soil carbon distribution (R = .906 at p < .01). Three models developed from MLR analysis revealed that Model 2 (adjusted R2 = .987 at p < .05) and Model 3 (adjusted R2 = .990 at p < .05) were both significant, hence Model 2 developed Equation (3), whereas Model 3 developed Equation (4). Prediction accuracy of the two equations revealed that Equation (3) (root mean square error [RMSE] = 2.597) performed better than Equation (4) (RMSE = 2.764), hence Equation (3) was the best fit model that developed the predicted map of soil carbon distribution (Model 1 predicted approximately 271 t/ha). This study shows that environmental variables can be used to predict soil carbon distribution. However, the limited number of sites (n = 8) could have greatly affected the model development exercise (e.g., the surprising positive correlation of soil carbon with MAT) and consequently the accuracy of the prediction map.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Legacies Matter: Exploring Social Acceptance of Pumped Storage Hydro in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Governing Transition: Case Studies in Transformative Adaptation Understanding Facilitators and Barriers to Success: Framework for Developing Community Forestry Case Studies The Bronx River and Environmental Justice Through the Lens of a Watershed Barriers and Facilitators for Successful Community Forestry: Lessons Learned and Practical Applications From Case Studies in India and Guatemala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1