盐湖盆地干旱程度分析的空间插值技术评价

A. Keshtkar, N. Moazami, A. Afzali
{"title":"盐湖盆地干旱程度分析的空间插值技术评价","authors":"A. Keshtkar, N. Moazami, A. Afzali","doi":"10.22059/JDESERT.2021.305618.1006786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drought risk management requires drought monitoring which is usually carried out by applying different drought indices which are, effectively, continuous functions of precipitation and other meteorological data. However, these indices are estimated at specific locations, and the spatial distribution of drought must be calculated in the form of maps. Geostatistical and deterministic techniques make it possible to interpolate spatially-referenced data. These methods are able to estimate values for arbitrary locations in regions of interest. The current study applied five spatial interpolation methods (inverse distance weighted, global polynomial interpolation, local polynomial interpolation, radial basic function, and kriging [with 4 sub-types]) to extract maps of SPI at 60 rain-gauge stations in the Salt Lake Basin of Iran. Based on the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean bias error values of estimations made using sampled data from 1969 to 2009, RBF and kriging techniques were the best and most suitable methods for the spatial analysis of SPI in the study area. The current study applied five spatial interpolation methods (inverse distance weighted, global polynomial interpolation, local polynomial interpolation, radial basic function, and kriging [with 4 sub-types]) to extract maps of SPI at 60 rain-gauge stations in the Salt Lake Basin of Iran. Based on the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean bias error values of estimations made using sampled data from 1969 to 2009, RBF and kriging techniques were the best and most suitable methods for the spatial analysis of SPI in the study area.","PeriodicalId":11118,"journal":{"name":"Desert","volume":"1003 1","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of spatial interpolation techniques for drought severity analysis in Salt Lake Basin\",\"authors\":\"A. Keshtkar, N. Moazami, A. Afzali\",\"doi\":\"10.22059/JDESERT.2021.305618.1006786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drought risk management requires drought monitoring which is usually carried out by applying different drought indices which are, effectively, continuous functions of precipitation and other meteorological data. However, these indices are estimated at specific locations, and the spatial distribution of drought must be calculated in the form of maps. Geostatistical and deterministic techniques make it possible to interpolate spatially-referenced data. These methods are able to estimate values for arbitrary locations in regions of interest. The current study applied five spatial interpolation methods (inverse distance weighted, global polynomial interpolation, local polynomial interpolation, radial basic function, and kriging [with 4 sub-types]) to extract maps of SPI at 60 rain-gauge stations in the Salt Lake Basin of Iran. Based on the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean bias error values of estimations made using sampled data from 1969 to 2009, RBF and kriging techniques were the best and most suitable methods for the spatial analysis of SPI in the study area. The current study applied five spatial interpolation methods (inverse distance weighted, global polynomial interpolation, local polynomial interpolation, radial basic function, and kriging [with 4 sub-types]) to extract maps of SPI at 60 rain-gauge stations in the Salt Lake Basin of Iran. Based on the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean bias error values of estimations made using sampled data from 1969 to 2009, RBF and kriging techniques were the best and most suitable methods for the spatial analysis of SPI in the study area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Desert\",\"volume\":\"1003 1\",\"pages\":\"85-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Desert\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22059/JDESERT.2021.305618.1006786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desert","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/JDESERT.2021.305618.1006786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

干旱风险管理需要干旱监测,通常通过应用不同的干旱指数来进行,这些指数是降水和其他气象数据的连续函数。然而,这些指数是在特定地点估计的,必须以地图的形式计算干旱的空间分布。地质统计学和确定性技术使得对空间参考数据进行插值成为可能。这些方法能够估计感兴趣区域中任意位置的值。目前的研究应用了五种空间插值方法(逆距离加权、全局多项式插值、局部多项式插值、径向基本函数和克里格法[有4个子类型])来提取伊朗盐湖盆地60个雨量站的SPI地图。基于1969年至2009年采样数据估计的均方根误差、平均绝对误差和平均偏误值,RBF和克里格技术是研究区域SPI空间分析的最佳和最合适的方法。目前的研究应用了五种空间插值方法(逆距离加权、全局多项式插值、局部多项式插值、径向基本函数和克里格法[有4个子类型])来提取伊朗盐湖盆地60个雨量站的SPI地图。基于1969年至2009年采样数据估计的均方根误差、平均绝对误差和平均偏误值,RBF和克里格技术是研究区域SPI空间分析的最佳和最合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of spatial interpolation techniques for drought severity analysis in Salt Lake Basin
Drought risk management requires drought monitoring which is usually carried out by applying different drought indices which are, effectively, continuous functions of precipitation and other meteorological data. However, these indices are estimated at specific locations, and the spatial distribution of drought must be calculated in the form of maps. Geostatistical and deterministic techniques make it possible to interpolate spatially-referenced data. These methods are able to estimate values for arbitrary locations in regions of interest. The current study applied five spatial interpolation methods (inverse distance weighted, global polynomial interpolation, local polynomial interpolation, radial basic function, and kriging [with 4 sub-types]) to extract maps of SPI at 60 rain-gauge stations in the Salt Lake Basin of Iran. Based on the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean bias error values of estimations made using sampled data from 1969 to 2009, RBF and kriging techniques were the best and most suitable methods for the spatial analysis of SPI in the study area. The current study applied five spatial interpolation methods (inverse distance weighted, global polynomial interpolation, local polynomial interpolation, radial basic function, and kriging [with 4 sub-types]) to extract maps of SPI at 60 rain-gauge stations in the Salt Lake Basin of Iran. Based on the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean bias error values of estimations made using sampled data from 1969 to 2009, RBF and kriging techniques were the best and most suitable methods for the spatial analysis of SPI in the study area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of spatial interpolation techniques for drought severity analysis in Salt Lake Basin An Ecological Agricultural Model Using Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE II Approach Investigation of Cd, Pb, and Ni contamination in soil and wheat plant in alluvial lands of Tigris River in southern Baghdad, Iraq Promotion of the seedling growth (Nitraria scoberi L.) in cultivating trays and seedling bag Assessment of agricultural drought using MODIS derived FAO's agriculture stress index system (ASIS) over the Iran croplands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1