比较学生对国家标准化考试和学校内部考试的动机和情绪反应:细节中的魔鬼

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australian Journal of Education Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1177/00049441211061889
Mark Dowley, S. Rice
{"title":"比较学生对国家标准化考试和学校内部考试的动机和情绪反应:细节中的魔鬼","authors":"Mark Dowley, S. Rice","doi":"10.1177/00049441211061889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National testing of students has become an increasingly prevalent policy tool, often implemented to drive improvement through increased accountability and heightened competition between schools. Such testing has been found to generate negative emotional responses among students, including increased stress and anxiety . However, there is little examining whether such responses are associated specifically with national testing regimes or are more general responses to testing situations. This study surveyed 206 students in Australian secondary schools to compare responses to NAPLAN and internal school tests. Students reported higher expectations for their performance in internal school tests than for NAPLAN, higher levels of boredom for NAPLAN and greater levels of confidence for their internal school tests. While most students reported low levels of negative emotional responses to NAPLAN, a small group of students reported strong negative emotional responses to both NAPLAN and internal school tests, suggesting that negative responses to national testing programs may be more dependent on the individual student.","PeriodicalId":46741,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing student motivations for and emotional responses to national standardised tests and internal school tests: The devil in the detail\",\"authors\":\"Mark Dowley, S. Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00049441211061889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"National testing of students has become an increasingly prevalent policy tool, often implemented to drive improvement through increased accountability and heightened competition between schools. Such testing has been found to generate negative emotional responses among students, including increased stress and anxiety . However, there is little examining whether such responses are associated specifically with national testing regimes or are more general responses to testing situations. This study surveyed 206 students in Australian secondary schools to compare responses to NAPLAN and internal school tests. Students reported higher expectations for their performance in internal school tests than for NAPLAN, higher levels of boredom for NAPLAN and greater levels of confidence for their internal school tests. While most students reported low levels of negative emotional responses to NAPLAN, a small group of students reported strong negative emotional responses to both NAPLAN and internal school tests, suggesting that negative responses to national testing programs may be more dependent on the individual student.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211061889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211061889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

全国学生考试已经成为一种越来越普遍的政策工具,通常是为了通过加强问责制和加强学校之间的竞争来推动进步。人们发现,这种测试会在学生中产生负面情绪反应,包括增加压力和焦虑。然而,很少有人审查这种反应是否与国家检测制度具体相关,或者是对检测情况的更一般的反应。这项研究调查了澳大利亚中学的206名学生,比较了他们对NAPLAN和学校内部测试的反应。与NAPLAN相比,学生们对自己在校内考试中的表现期望更高,对NAPLAN的厌烦程度更高,对校内考试的信心程度更高。虽然大多数学生报告对NAPLAN的负面情绪反应水平较低,但一小部分学生报告对NAPLAN和学校内部测试都有强烈的负面情绪反应,这表明对国家测试计划的负面反应可能更多地取决于学生个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing student motivations for and emotional responses to national standardised tests and internal school tests: The devil in the detail
National testing of students has become an increasingly prevalent policy tool, often implemented to drive improvement through increased accountability and heightened competition between schools. Such testing has been found to generate negative emotional responses among students, including increased stress and anxiety . However, there is little examining whether such responses are associated specifically with national testing regimes or are more general responses to testing situations. This study surveyed 206 students in Australian secondary schools to compare responses to NAPLAN and internal school tests. Students reported higher expectations for their performance in internal school tests than for NAPLAN, higher levels of boredom for NAPLAN and greater levels of confidence for their internal school tests. While most students reported low levels of negative emotional responses to NAPLAN, a small group of students reported strong negative emotional responses to both NAPLAN and internal school tests, suggesting that negative responses to national testing programs may be more dependent on the individual student.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Education
Australian Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Education was established in 1957 under the editorship of Professor Bill Connell. Drawing upon research conducted in Australia and internationally, the AJE aims to inform educational researchers as well as educators, administrators and policymakers about issues of contemporary concern in education. The AJE seeks to publish research studies that contribute to educational knowledge and research methodologies, and that review findings of research studies. Its scope embraces all fields of education and training. In addition to publishing research studies about education it also publishes articles that address education in relation to other fields.
期刊最新文献
Associations between mental health profiles and later school outcomes Indigenous Early Career Researcher’s Perspectives of ‘safe spaces’’ in Higher Education Issues in staffing and outsourcing in schools. Who’s teaching health and physical education? The level of predictability of past reading attainment and self-perception and behavioural measures on children’s reading achievement Creating and enacting culturally responsive assessment for First Nations students in higher education settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1