知识管理策略的变化可以支持有机农业中新兴的创新参与者:以欧洲的参与式植物育种为例

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Organic Farming Pub Date : 2017-05-05 DOI:10.12924/OF2017.03010020
L. Ortolani, R. Bocci, P. Bàrberi, S. Howlett, V. Chable
{"title":"知识管理策略的变化可以支持有机农业中新兴的创新参与者:以欧洲的参与式植物育种为例","authors":"L. Ortolani, R. Bocci, P. Bàrberi, S. Howlett, V. Chable","doi":"10.12924/OF2017.03010020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “transfer of technology”, typical of a top-down linear process of innovation cannot be used in the new contexts of sustainability, characterised by uncertainty and complexity. There is a need to redefine categories and concepts around which innovation and agricultural policies are built, as those currently in use provide only a partial representation of reality. Innovation paradigms underpinning technological development and public policies design will have a direct impact on decisions regarding which agricultural models will ultimately be supported. Looking at local learning capacity and systems of relations can help to understand the potential to develop innovation within a specific context. This work contributes to the definition of new actors who are developing innovation for sustainability in rural areas. The study focuses on the knowledge systems of farmers who are applying alternative breeding strategies: it uses a network approach to explore the knowledge system in which individual farmers are embedded in order to understand their specific relational features. Three main conclusions emerge from the study: for enhancing the agro-ecological innovation paradigm there is a need to define the ‘innovation broker’, to revise the evaluation system of public research and to integrate innovation and agricultural policies.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"12 11","pages":"20-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Knowledge Management Strategies Can Support Emerging Innovative Actors in Organic Agriculture: The Case of Participatory Plant Breeding in Europe\",\"authors\":\"L. Ortolani, R. Bocci, P. Bàrberi, S. Howlett, V. Chable\",\"doi\":\"10.12924/OF2017.03010020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “transfer of technology”, typical of a top-down linear process of innovation cannot be used in the new contexts of sustainability, characterised by uncertainty and complexity. There is a need to redefine categories and concepts around which innovation and agricultural policies are built, as those currently in use provide only a partial representation of reality. Innovation paradigms underpinning technological development and public policies design will have a direct impact on decisions regarding which agricultural models will ultimately be supported. Looking at local learning capacity and systems of relations can help to understand the potential to develop innovation within a specific context. This work contributes to the definition of new actors who are developing innovation for sustainability in rural areas. The study focuses on the knowledge systems of farmers who are applying alternative breeding strategies: it uses a network approach to explore the knowledge system in which individual farmers are embedded in order to understand their specific relational features. Three main conclusions emerge from the study: for enhancing the agro-ecological innovation paradigm there is a need to define the ‘innovation broker’, to revise the evaluation system of public research and to integrate innovation and agricultural policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organic Farming\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"20-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organic Farming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12924/OF2017.03010020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Farming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/OF2017.03010020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

典型的自上而下的线性创新过程的“技术转让”不能用于以不确定性和复杂性为特征的可持续性的新背景。有必要重新定义创新和农业政策所围绕的类别和概念,因为目前使用的类别和概念只能部分反映现实。支撑技术发展和公共政策设计的创新范式将对最终支持哪种农业模式的决策产生直接影响。考察当地的学习能力和关系体系有助于了解在特定背景下发展创新的潜力。这项工作有助于界定正在为农村地区的可持续性发展进行创新的新行为者。本研究的重点是采用替代育种策略的农民的知识系统:它使用网络方法来探索单个农民所嵌入的知识系统,以了解他们的具体关系特征。该研究得出了三个主要结论:为了加强农业生态创新范式,需要定义“创新经纪人”,修改公共研究的评估体系,并将创新与农业政策结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in Knowledge Management Strategies Can Support Emerging Innovative Actors in Organic Agriculture: The Case of Participatory Plant Breeding in Europe
The “transfer of technology”, typical of a top-down linear process of innovation cannot be used in the new contexts of sustainability, characterised by uncertainty and complexity. There is a need to redefine categories and concepts around which innovation and agricultural policies are built, as those currently in use provide only a partial representation of reality. Innovation paradigms underpinning technological development and public policies design will have a direct impact on decisions regarding which agricultural models will ultimately be supported. Looking at local learning capacity and systems of relations can help to understand the potential to develop innovation within a specific context. This work contributes to the definition of new actors who are developing innovation for sustainability in rural areas. The study focuses on the knowledge systems of farmers who are applying alternative breeding strategies: it uses a network approach to explore the knowledge system in which individual farmers are embedded in order to understand their specific relational features. Three main conclusions emerge from the study: for enhancing the agro-ecological innovation paradigm there is a need to define the ‘innovation broker’, to revise the evaluation system of public research and to integrate innovation and agricultural policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organic Farming
Organic Farming Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
On-farm Validation of Coffee arabica and Aloe vera Extracts for Management of Seed-Borne Bacterial Leaf Spot Disease of Tomato Growth and Yield Responses of Leafy Vegetables Grown in Organic and Conventional Agriculture Systems On-farm Research to Diversify Organic Farming Systems A Proposal for Improving Organic Group Certification Quantification of Internal Control Systems' Performance and Sample Size Determination Carrying Capacity of Traditional Farming in South East England: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1