我们在衡量什么?衡量任务绩效、组织公民、反生产和退出行为的项目评估

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Human Performance Pub Date : 2021-08-08 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2021.1956928
Nichelle C. Carpenter, Daniel A. Newman, W. Arthur
{"title":"我们在衡量什么?衡量任务绩效、组织公民、反生产和退出行为的项目评估","authors":"Nichelle C. Carpenter, Daniel A. Newman, W. Arthur","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2021.1956928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the items on commonly used scales measuring task performance, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), counterproductive work behavior (CWB), and work withdrawal were judged to represent alternative behaviors. We first found that each scale contained items that were judged (by three independent samples) to represent an alternative construct. Importantly, we empirically verified these suggested scale revisions with an independent sample of multi-source behavioral ratings that showed model fit improvements and factor loading increases when items were moved to the suggested scales. We also found that, compared to the original scales, revised scales measuring task performance and OCB showed (a) more trait variance; (b) improved reliability; (c) lower mean levels; and (d) weaker correlations with nomological correlates.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":"88 12","pages":"316 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are We Measuring? Evaluations of Items Measuring Task Performance, Organizational Citizenship, Counterproductive, and Withdrawal Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Nichelle C. Carpenter, Daniel A. Newman, W. Arthur\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2021.1956928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the items on commonly used scales measuring task performance, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), counterproductive work behavior (CWB), and work withdrawal were judged to represent alternative behaviors. We first found that each scale contained items that were judged (by three independent samples) to represent an alternative construct. Importantly, we empirically verified these suggested scale revisions with an independent sample of multi-source behavioral ratings that showed model fit improvements and factor loading increases when items were moved to the suggested scales. We also found that, compared to the original scales, revised scales measuring task performance and OCB showed (a) more trait variance; (b) improved reliability; (c) lower mean levels; and (d) weaker correlations with nomological correlates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"316 - 349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.1956928\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.1956928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究调查了衡量任务绩效、组织公民行为(OCB)、反作用工作行为(CWB)和工作退出的常用量表中的项目是否被判断为代表替代行为。我们首先发现,每个量表都包含(通过三个独立样本)判断为代表替代结构的项目。重要的是,我们用多源行为评级的独立样本实证验证了这些建议的量表修订,该样本显示,当项目移动到建议量表时,模型拟合得到改善,因子负荷增加。我们还发现,与原始量表相比,测量任务表现和OCB的修订量表显示(a)更多的特质方差;(b) 提高可靠性;(c) 较低的平均水平;以及(d)与法理相关性较弱的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are We Measuring? Evaluations of Items Measuring Task Performance, Organizational Citizenship, Counterproductive, and Withdrawal Behaviors
ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the items on commonly used scales measuring task performance, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), counterproductive work behavior (CWB), and work withdrawal were judged to represent alternative behaviors. We first found that each scale contained items that were judged (by three independent samples) to represent an alternative construct. Importantly, we empirically verified these suggested scale revisions with an independent sample of multi-source behavioral ratings that showed model fit improvements and factor loading increases when items were moved to the suggested scales. We also found that, compared to the original scales, revised scales measuring task performance and OCB showed (a) more trait variance; (b) improved reliability; (c) lower mean levels; and (d) weaker correlations with nomological correlates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Performance
Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.
期刊最新文献
The Normative Judgment Test of Honesty-Humility: An Implicit Instrument for Organizational Contexts Mechanisms Underlying the Use of Power-Creativity Relationship in the Military: Achievement Motivation and Identification Authentic Leadership’s Impact on Follower Psychological Capital and Performance Through Organizational Identification and Role Clarity Doing Good to Be (Subtly) Bad: A Moral Licensing View on the Relations Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Instigated Incivility Toxic Triads: Supervisor Characteristics, Subordinate Self-Esteem, and Supervisor Stressors in Relation to Perceptions of Abusive Supervision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1