智能手表和便携式健康设备测量血压的准确性

N. van Helmond, Cecilia G Freeman, Christina Hahnen, Nilanjan Haldar, Jacquelyn N Hamati, Dylan M Bard, Vignesh Murali, G. Merli, J. Joseph
{"title":"智能手表和便携式健康设备测量血压的准确性","authors":"N. van Helmond, Cecilia G Freeman, Christina Hahnen, Nilanjan Haldar, Jacquelyn N Hamati, Dylan M Bard, Vignesh Murali, G. Merli, J. Joseph","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2019.1656991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: Handheld medical devices and smartwatches that measure BP without a cuff have recently become available. Since these measurements are relatively more user-friendly than conventional cuff-based measurements they may aid in more frequent BP monitoring. We investigated the accuracy and precision of two popular cuff-less devices: the Everlast smartwatch and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor. Methods: We enrolled 127 patients from the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Preadmission Testing Center. Research staff were trained to measure BP according to manufacturer guidelines for the investigational devices. The Everlast smartwatch provides measurements of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, whereas the Bodimetrics only provides SBP. Reference BP measurements were obtained using a hospital-grade automated sphygmomanometer. After 5 minutes of quiet sitting, four standard and three investigational BP measurements were taken with sixty seconds in between each measurement. The reference BP value was calculated by determining the average of the 2 standard BP measurements that bounded the investigational measurements. We thus determined 3 comparison pairs for each investigational device in each subject. We calculated the mean (SD) of the absolute difference between the respective investigational devices and the reference for SBP and DBP. Results: Data from 42 individuals was excluded because of variation in standard BP measurements per prespecified rules. Of 85 participants used for analysis, 36 (42%) were women, the mean (SD) age was 53 (21) years, 32 (38%) self-reported hypertension, and 97% of these (n = 31) reported taking antihypertensive medications. The average differences between the Everlast watch and reference were 16.9 (13.5) mm Hg for SBP and 8.3 (6.1) mm Hg for DBP. The average difference between the Bodimetrics performance monitor and the reference was 5.3 (4.7) mm Hg for SBP. Conclusions: The Everlast smartwatch and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor we tested are not accurate enough to be used as BP measurement devices.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":" 10","pages":"211 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2019.1656991","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of blood pressure measurement by a smartwatch and a portable health device\",\"authors\":\"N. van Helmond, Cecilia G Freeman, Christina Hahnen, Nilanjan Haldar, Jacquelyn N Hamati, Dylan M Bard, Vignesh Murali, G. Merli, J. Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.2019.1656991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objectives: Handheld medical devices and smartwatches that measure BP without a cuff have recently become available. Since these measurements are relatively more user-friendly than conventional cuff-based measurements they may aid in more frequent BP monitoring. We investigated the accuracy and precision of two popular cuff-less devices: the Everlast smartwatch and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor. Methods: We enrolled 127 patients from the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Preadmission Testing Center. Research staff were trained to measure BP according to manufacturer guidelines for the investigational devices. The Everlast smartwatch provides measurements of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, whereas the Bodimetrics only provides SBP. Reference BP measurements were obtained using a hospital-grade automated sphygmomanometer. After 5 minutes of quiet sitting, four standard and three investigational BP measurements were taken with sixty seconds in between each measurement. The reference BP value was calculated by determining the average of the 2 standard BP measurements that bounded the investigational measurements. We thus determined 3 comparison pairs for each investigational device in each subject. We calculated the mean (SD) of the absolute difference between the respective investigational devices and the reference for SBP and DBP. Results: Data from 42 individuals was excluded because of variation in standard BP measurements per prespecified rules. Of 85 participants used for analysis, 36 (42%) were women, the mean (SD) age was 53 (21) years, 32 (38%) self-reported hypertension, and 97% of these (n = 31) reported taking antihypertensive medications. The average differences between the Everlast watch and reference were 16.9 (13.5) mm Hg for SBP and 8.3 (6.1) mm Hg for DBP. The average difference between the Bodimetrics performance monitor and the reference was 5.3 (4.7) mm Hg for SBP. Conclusions: The Everlast smartwatch and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor we tested are not accurate enough to be used as BP measurement devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"211 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2019.1656991\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2019.1656991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2019.1656991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

摘要目的:无需袖带即可测量血压的手持式医疗设备和智能手表最近问世。由于这些测量相对来说比传统的基于袖带的测量更方便用户,因此它们可能有助于更频繁的BP监测。我们调查了两款流行的无袖带设备:Everlast智能手表和BodiMetrics性能监视器的准确性和精度。方法:我们从托马斯杰斐逊大学医院入院前测试中心招募了127名患者。研究人员接受了培训,按照研究器械制造商指南测量血压。Everlast智能手表提供收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的测量,而Bodimetrics只提供收缩压。使用医院级自动血压计获得参考血压测量值。安静坐5分钟后,在每次测量间隔60秒的时间内进行四次标准血压测量和三次研究性血压测量。参考血压值是通过确定两个标准血压测量值的平均值来计算的,这两个标准测量值限定了研究测量值。因此,我们为每个受试者的每个研究器械确定了3对比较对。我们计算了SBP和DBP的各个研究器械与参考器械之间的绝对差异的平均值(SD)。结果:根据预先指定的规则,由于标准血压测量值的变化,42名个体的数据被排除在外。在用于分析的85名参与者中,36名(42%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为53(21)岁,32名(38%)自我报告患有高血压,其中97%(n=31)报告服用了抗高血压药物。Everlast手表和参考之间的SBP平均差异为16.9(13.5)毫米汞柱,DBP平均差异8.3(6.1)毫米汞汞柱。Bodimetrics性能监测器和参考之间SBP的平均差异为5.3(4.7)mm Hg。结论:我们测试的Everlast智能手表和BodiMetrics性能监测器不够准确,无法用作血压测量设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The accuracy of blood pressure measurement by a smartwatch and a portable health device
ABSTRACT Objectives: Handheld medical devices and smartwatches that measure BP without a cuff have recently become available. Since these measurements are relatively more user-friendly than conventional cuff-based measurements they may aid in more frequent BP monitoring. We investigated the accuracy and precision of two popular cuff-less devices: the Everlast smartwatch and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor. Methods: We enrolled 127 patients from the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Preadmission Testing Center. Research staff were trained to measure BP according to manufacturer guidelines for the investigational devices. The Everlast smartwatch provides measurements of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, whereas the Bodimetrics only provides SBP. Reference BP measurements were obtained using a hospital-grade automated sphygmomanometer. After 5 minutes of quiet sitting, four standard and three investigational BP measurements were taken with sixty seconds in between each measurement. The reference BP value was calculated by determining the average of the 2 standard BP measurements that bounded the investigational measurements. We thus determined 3 comparison pairs for each investigational device in each subject. We calculated the mean (SD) of the absolute difference between the respective investigational devices and the reference for SBP and DBP. Results: Data from 42 individuals was excluded because of variation in standard BP measurements per prespecified rules. Of 85 participants used for analysis, 36 (42%) were women, the mean (SD) age was 53 (21) years, 32 (38%) self-reported hypertension, and 97% of these (n = 31) reported taking antihypertensive medications. The average differences between the Everlast watch and reference were 16.9 (13.5) mm Hg for SBP and 8.3 (6.1) mm Hg for DBP. The average difference between the Bodimetrics performance monitor and the reference was 5.3 (4.7) mm Hg for SBP. Conclusions: The Everlast smartwatch and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor we tested are not accurate enough to be used as BP measurement devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review. Hospitalists' COVID-19 management roles in hospitals without infectious disease specialists. Cardiac rehabilitation. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.617: host tropism, proteolytic activation, cell-cell fusion, and neutralization sensitivity. How could perioperative anxiety be addressed via surgical team communication approaches? Findings from a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1